Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T03:20:58.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role and status of Nautilus in its natural habitat: evidence from deep-water remote camera photosequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

W. Bruce Saunders
W. Bruce Saunders*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bottom site remote camera photosequences at depths of 73–538 m on forereef slopes in Palau show that Nautilus belauensis is a highly mobile, chemosensitive, epibenthic scavenger and opportunistic predator. The overall depth range of this species is ca. 70–500 m, but photosequences indicate a preferred range of 150–300 m. Nautilus is active both nocturnally and diurnally, locating bait sites within 1–2 h. Associated macrofauna includes caridean shrimps, crabs, and eels; teleosts are rare below 100 m, but sharks are recorded in most photosequences below 250 m. Summarily, Nautilus exhibits a combination of characters that typify deep-sea strategy, including reproductive tactics, growth rate, and population dynamics. This and other evidence suggest that fossil Nautilidae may have been deep-water forms, in contrast to the typically shallower water ammonoids, and that Nautilus is a normal component of the deep forereef rather than a late Cretaceous refugee from shallow water.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , Fall 1984 , pp. 469 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, J. M. 1984. Cephalopods. Pp. 419–454. In: The Mollusca, Vol. 7, Reproduction. Academic Press; N.Y.Google Scholar
Carlson, B. 1979. Chambered nautilus: a new challenge for aquarists. Freshwater and Marine Aquarium. 2:48–51, 63.Google Scholar
Carlson, B., McKibben, J., and deGruy, M. V.Radiotelemetric studies of Nautilus belauensis in Palau. Pacific Science. In press.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1980. Motor performance and jet propulsion in Nautilus: implications for cephalopod paleobiology and evolution. Bull. Am. Malacol. Union. 1980.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. and Moore, W. A. Jr. 1982. Rupture strength and flow rate of Nautilus siphuncular tube. Paleobiology. 8:408–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1966. The Red Bird section of the Upper Cretaceous Pierre Shale in Wyoming. U.S.G.S. Prof. Pap. 393-A. 73 pp.Google Scholar
Cochran, J. K. 1982. The use of naturally occurring radionuclides as tracers for biologically related processes in deep-sea sediments. Pp. 55–72. In: Ernst, W. G. and Morin, J. G., eds. The Environment of the Deep Sea. Rubey Vol. 2. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
Cochran, J. K. and Landman, N. H. 1984. Radiometric determination of the growth rate of Nautilus in nature. Nature 308:725–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, J. K., Rye, D. M., and Landman, N. H. 1981. Growth rate and habitat of Nautilus pompilius inferred from radioactive and stable isotope studies. Paleobiology 7:469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, R. E. and Ottensmann, V. M. 1983. Sr, Mg, Ca and Mn chemistry of skeletal components of a Pennsylvanian and Recent nautiloid. Chem. Geol. 39:147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. R. 1859. On the Origin of Species. 490 pp. John Murray; London.Google Scholar
Dayton, P. K. and Hessler, R. R. 1972. Role of biological disturbance in maintaining diversity in the deep sea. Deep-Sea Res. 19:199–208.Google Scholar
Feller, R. J., Taghon, G. L., Gallagher, E. D., Kenny, G. E., and Jumars, P. A. 1979. Immunological methods for food web analysis in a soft-bottom benthic community. Mar. Biol. 54:61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, B. and Talbot, F. H. 1976. Aspects of the ecology of coral reef fishes. Pp. 125–154. In: Jones, O. A. and Endean, R., eds. Biology and Geology of Coral Reefs. Vol. 3: Biology 2. Academic Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassle, J. F. 1978. Diversity and population dynamics of benthic organisms. Oceanus. 21:42–49.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F. and Sanders, H. L. 1973. Life histories and the role of disturbance. Deep-Sea Res. 20:643–659.Google Scholar
Greenwald, L., Ward, P., and Greenwald, O. 1980. Cameral liquid transport and buoyancy control in the chambered Nautilus (Nautilus macromphalus). Nature. 286:55–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamner, P. and Hamner, W. M. 1977. Chemosensory tracking of scent trails by the planktonic shrimp Acetes australis. Science. 195:886–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haven, N. 1972. The ecology and behavior of Nautilus pompilius in the Philippines. Veliger. 15:75–80.Google Scholar
Hayasaka, S. 1983. Studies on Nautilus pompilius and its associated fauna from Tañon Strait, the Philippines. Kagoshima Univ. Res. Center for the South Pacific, Occ. Papers. 1:1–54.Google Scholar
Hayasaka, S., Saisho, T., Kakinuma, Y., Shinomiya, A., Oki, K., Hamada, T., Tanabe, K., Kanie, Y., Hattori, M., Vande Vusse, F., Alcala, L., Cordero, P. A. Jr., Cabrera, J. J., and Garcia, R. G. 1982. Field study on the habitat of Nautilus in the environs of Cebu and Negros Islands, the Philippines. Mem. Kagoshima Univ. Res. Center for the South Pacific. 3:67–137.Google Scholar
Hurley, A. C., Lange, G. D., and Hartline, P. H. 1978. The adjustable “pinhole camera” eye of Nautilus. J. Exp. Zool. 205:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, J. D. and Schwartzlose, R. A. 1975. Active animals of the deep-sea floor. Sci. Am. 233:85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japanese Expert Consultation on Living Nautilus (JECOLN). 1980. Nautilus macromphalus in captivity. xxiv + 80 pp. Tokai Univ. Press; Tokyo.Google Scholar
Jumars, P. A. and Gallagher, E. D. 1982. Deep-sea community structure: three plays on the benthic proscenium. Pp. 215–255. In: Ernst, W. G. and Morin, J. G., eds. The Environment of the Deep Sea. Rubey Vol. 2. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
Kanie, Y., Fukuda, Y., Nakayama, H., Seki, K., and Hattori, M. 1980. Implosion of living Nautilus under increased pressure. Paleobiology. 6:44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanie, Y. and Tanabe, K. 1979. Preliminary report on the ecology of Nautilus pompilius in the Philippine seas. Ann. Rept. Yokosuka City Mus. 25:26–29.Google Scholar
King, M. G.The species and depth distribution of deep water caridean shrimps (Decapoda, Caridea) near some southwest Pacific Islands. In prep.Google Scholar
Landman, N. H., Rye, D. M., and Shelton, K. L. 1983. Early ontogeny of Eutrephoceras compared to Recent Nautilus and Mesozoic ammonites: evidence from shell morphology and light stable isotopes. Paleobiology. 9:269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. L. and Macurda, D. B. Jr. 1977. Adaptive radiation of the comatulid crinoids. Paleobiology. 3:74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muntz, W. R. A. and Raj, U. 1984. On the visual system of Nautilus pompilius. J. Exp. Biol. 109:253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, A. 1972. Cephalopods and fish: the limits of convergence. Biol. Rev. 47:241–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R., and Charnov, E. L. 1977. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Quart. Rev. Biol. 52:137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rannou, M. R. 1976. Age et croissance d'un poisson bethyal: Nezumia sclerorhynchus (Macrouridae: Gadiforme) de la Mer d'Alboran. Cahiers Biol. Mar. 27:413–421.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. and Takahashi, T. 1966. Experiments on strength of cephalopod shells. Geol. Soc. Am. Ann. Meet. 1966 Abstr.172–173.Google Scholar
Rokop, F. J. 1974. Reproductive patterns in the deep-sea benthos. Science. 186:743–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, H. L. and Allen, J. A. 1973. Studies on deep-sea Protobrachia: prologue and the Pristiglomidae. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 145:237–261.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1973. Upper Mississippian ammonoids from Arkansas and Oklahoma. Geol. Soc. Am. Sp. Pap. 145. 110 pp.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1981a. A new species of Nautilus from Palau. Veliger. 24:1–7.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1981b. The species of living Nautilus and their distribution. Veliger. 24:8–17.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1983. Natural rates of growth and longevity of Nautilus belauensis. Paleobiology. 9:280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W. B. 1984. Nautilus growth and longevity: evidence from marked and recaptured animals. Science. 224:990–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, W. B.Studies of living Nautilus in Palau. Natl. Geog. Soc. Res. Rep. In press.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. B. and Spinosa, C. 1978. Sexual dimorphism in Nautilus from Palau. Paleobiology. 4:349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, W. B. and Spinosa, C. 1979. Nautilus movement and distribution in Palau, Western Caroline Islands. Science. 204:1199–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, W. B. and Wehman, D. A. 1977. Shell strength of Nautilus as a depth limiting factor. Paleobiology. 3:83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. 434 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution Pattern and Process. 332 pp. W. H. Freeman; San Francisco.Google Scholar
Tanabe, K. and Hamada, T. 1978. Keeping record of a drifted living Nautilus pompilius specimen caught off Kagoshima Bay and its significance. Kaiyo Kagaku. 10:1011–1017 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Turekian, K. K., Cochran, J. K., and Nozaki, Y. 1979. Growth rate of a clam from the Galapagos Rise hot spring field using natural radionuclide ratios. Nature. 280:385–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Biogeography and Adaptation Patterns of Marine Life. 332 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Waage, K. M. 1968. The Type Fox Hills Formation, Cretaceous (Maestrichtian), South Dakota. Part 1. Stratigraphy and Paleoenvironments. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. (Yale Univ.) Bull. 27. 175 pp.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Chamberlain, J. A. Jr. 1983. Radiographic observation of chamber formation in Nautilus pompilius. Nature. 304:57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Martin, A. W. 1980. Depth distribution of Nautilus pompilius in Fiji and Nautilus macromphalus in New Caledonia. Veliger. 22:259–264.Google Scholar
Ward, P. D. and Wicksten, M. K. 1980. Food sources and feeding behavior of Nautilus macromphalus. Veliger. 23:119–124.Google Scholar
Ward, P., Carlson, B., Weekley, M., and Brumbaugh, B. 1984. Remote telemetry of daily vertical and horizontal movement of Nautilus in Palau. Nature. 309:248–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D., Greenwald, L., and Magnier, Y. 1981. The chamber formation cycle in Nautilus macromphalus. Paleobiology. 7:481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. D., Greenwald, L., and Rougerie, F. 1980. Shell strength of Nautilus macromphalus. Lethaia. 13:182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M. J. 1983. Cephalopods do it differently. N. Sci. 100:332–338.Google Scholar
Willey, A. 1902. Contribution to the natural history of the pearly Nautilus. Zoological results based on material from New Britain, New Guinea, Loyalty Islands and elsewhere, collected during the years 1895, 1896 and 1897. Part 6, 691–830, pls. 75–83. Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, D. S., Mulvey, M., Saunders, W. B., and Carpenter, M. P. 1983. Genetic variation in the cephalopod Nautilus belauensis. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia. 135:147–153.Google Scholar