Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:08:56.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in peccaries (Mammalia, Tayassuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

David B. Wright
David B. Wright*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, and Pratt Museum of Natural History, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cladistic analysis of osteological and dental characters in a monophyletic group of Miocene and younger tayassuids demonstrates a pattern of changes in the degree of sexual dimorphism in canine tooth diameter and zygomatic arch width, and in phenotypic correlations between these characters. Primitively, tayassuids have canine teeth that are sexually dimorphic and discretely bimodal in size, and zygomatic arches that are narrow in both sexes. Many late Miocene and Pliocene tayassuids have broad, winglike zygomatic processes. In some species, these processes are large in both sexes, but in others, those of females are much smaller than those of males. The presence of large processes in both sexes is primitive relative to the condition of strong sexual dimorphism. In five separate clades, the zygomatic processes of both sexes become reduced in size, and the degree of sexual dimorphism in canine size becomes reduced as well. The pattern is congruent with predictions derived from a theoretical model of the evolution of sexual dimorphism, and it further indicates the emergence of a new phenotypic correlation between two previously uncorrelated characters, canine size and zygoma size. The advent of this new correlation coincides with the advent of pronounced sexual dimorphism in zygomatic processes. Although such a pattern could be explained by genetically modifying phenotypic expression of homologous characters in one sex or the other, an epigenetic modification of expression is equally plausible: the evolution of sexual dimorphism in homologous characters could be accomplished by placing phenotypic expression of an originally monomorphic character under the control of steroid sex hormones. This hypothesis is consistent with evidence from many vertebrate groups, and it provides testable predictions.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , Winter 1993 , pp. 52 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aldrich, J. C. 1987. Graphical analyses of bimodal frequency distributions with an example using Cancer pagurus. Journal of Zoology, London 211:307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, P. J. 1982. Comparative vertebrate endocrinology. 2d ed.Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Byers, J. A. 1981. Peaceable peccaries. Natural History (June 1981):61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. A., and Bekoff, M. 1981. Social, spacing, and cooperative behavior of the collared peccary, Tayassu tajacu. Journal of Mammalogy 62:767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagle, F. R. 1950. The life history of the slider turtle, Pseudemys scripta troostii. Ecological Monographs 20:32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardwell, J. R., and Liley, N. R. 1991. Hormonal control of sex and color change in the stoplight parrotfish, Sparisoma viride. General and Comparative Endocrinology 81:7–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombs, M. C. 1975. Sexual dimorphism in chalicotheres (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Systematic Zoology 24:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, D.H.M. 1975. A field study of the ecology and behavior of warthog. Memoir of the National Museum of Rhodesia 7:1–179.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relationship to sex. J. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. 1874. The descent of man, and selection in relationship to sex. 2d ed.J. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Ewer, R. F. 1958. Adaptive features in the skulls of African Suidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 31:135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. 2d ed.Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Flood, N. J. 1984. Adaptive significance of delayed plumage maturation in male Northern Orioles. Evolution 38:267–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaffney, E. S. 1979. An introduction to the logic of phylogenetic reconstruction. Pp. 79–111in Cracraft, J. and Eldredge, N., eds. Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V. 1974. On the relationship of social evolution and ecology in ungulates. American Zoologist 14:205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidley, J. W. 1920. Pleistocene peccaries from the Cumberland Cave deposit. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 57:651–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidley, J. W., and Gazin, C. L. 1938. The Pleistocene vertebrate fauna from Cumberland Cave, Maryland. United States National Museum Bulletin 171:1–99.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, L. 1974. Les Tayassuides des phosphorites du Quercy. Palaeovertebrata 6:55–85.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Vrba, E. S. 1982. Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. M., and White, T. D. 1979. Evolution of the Plio-Pleistocene African Suidae. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 69(2):1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. W. 1972. The role of canine morphology in the divergence between pigs and peccaries. Journal of Mammalogy 53:500–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, C. 1982. Evolution of horns in ungulates: ecology and paleoecology. Biological Reviews 57:261–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, C., 1990. Correlation of reproductive and digestive strategies in the evolution of cranial appendages. Pp. 114–133in Bubenik, G. A. and Bubenik, A. B., eds. Horns, pronghorns, and antlers: evolution, morphology, physiology, and social significance. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman, P. J. 1974. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman, P. J. 1983. Mating system and sexual dimorphism in large, terrestrial herbivores. Biological Reviews 58:485–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiltie, R. A. 1985. Evolution and function of horns and hornlike organs in ungulates. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 24:299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. 1979. East African mammals, an atlas of evolution in Africa. Volume IIIB, Large mammals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorber, M., Alvo, G., and Zontine, W. J. 1979. Sexual dimorphism of canine teeth of small dogs. Archives of Oral Biology 24:585–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundelius, E. L., Downs, T., Lindsay, E. H., Semken, H. A., Zakrewski, R. J., Churcher, C. S., Harington, C. R., Schultz, G. E., and Webb, S. D. 1987. The North American Quaternary sequence. Pp. 211–235in Woodburne, M. O., ed. Cenozoic mammals of North America: geochronology and biostratigraphy. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lyon, B. E., and Montgomerie, R. D. 1986. Delayed plumage maturation in passerine birds: reliable signaling by subordinate males? Evolution 40:605–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, W. P., Donoghue, M. J., and Maddison, D. R. 1984. Outgroup analysis and parsimony. Systematic Zoology 33:83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L. G., Berta, A., Hoffstetter, R., Pascual, R., Reig, O. A., Bombin, M., and Mones, A. 1984. Mammals and stratigraphy: geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Quaternary of South America. Palaeovertebrata 1984:1–76.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. J. 1988. Sex identification of Sus scrofa based on canine morphology. Journal of Mammalogy 69:408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. J., and Brandt, P. N. 1982. Identity, distribution, and natural history of the peccaries, Tayassuidae. Special Publication Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology 6:433–455.Google Scholar
Nur, N., and Hasson, O. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110:275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packard, J. M., Babbit, K. J., Franchek, K. M., and Pierce, P. M. 1991. Sexual competition in captive collared peccaries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 29:319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, C. 1983. Sexual dimorphism: the horns of African antelopes. Science (Washington, D.C.) 221:1191–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickford, M. 1983. On the origins of Hippopotamidae together with descriptions of two new species, a new genus, and a new subfamily from the Miocene of Kenya. Geobios 16:193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponse, K. 1923. Masculinasation d'une femelle de crapaud. Compte Rendu des Seances de la Société de Physique et d'Histoire Naturelle de Génève 39:144.Google Scholar
Procter-Gray, E., and Holmes, R. T. 1981. Adaptive significance of delayed attainment of plumage in male redstarts: tests of two hypotheses. Evolution 35:742–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richey, K. A. 1948. Lower Pliocene horses from Black Hawk Ranch, Mount Diablo, California. Bulletin of the Department of Geology, University of California 28:1–44.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S. A. 1978. Passerine subadult plumages and the deceptive acquisition of resources: test of a critical assumption. Condor 80:173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohwer, S. A., Fretwell, S. D., and Niles, D. M. 1980. Delayed maturation in passerine plumages and the deceptive acquisition of resources. American Naturalist 115:400–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1949. A fossil deposit in a cave in St. Louis. American Museum Novitates 1408:1–46.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. 1960. Quantitative zoology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. F., and Johnson, F. W. 1984. Tertiary stratigraphy and the Frick Collection of fossil vertebrates from north-central Nebraska. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 178:215–368.Google Scholar
Sowls, L. K. 1984. The peccaries. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Swisher, C. C. III, and Prothero, D. R. 1990. Single-crystal 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Eocene-Oligocene Transition in North America. Science (Washington, D.C.) 249:760–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swofford, D. L. 1985. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 2.4. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
Tedford, R. H., Galusha, T., Skinner, M. F., Taylor, B. E., Fields, R. W., Macdonald, J. R., Rensberger, J. M., Webb, S. D., and Whistler, D. P. 1987. Faunal succession and biochronology of the Arikareean through Hemphillian interval (Late Oligocene through earliest Pliocene epochs) in North America. Pp. 153–210in Woodburne, M. O., ed. Cenozoic mammals of North America: geochronology and biostratigraphy. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. 1871. A review and criticism of Mr. Darwin's Descent of man. Academy (London) 2:177–183. (Reprinted in C. J. Bajema, ed. 1984. Evolution by sexual selection theory: prior to 1900. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.)Google Scholar
Webb, S. D., MacFadden, B. J., and Baskin, J. A. 1981. Geology and paleontology of the Love Bone Bed from the late Miocene of Florida. American Journal of Science 281:513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L. 1990. Sygraph: the system for graphics. Systat, Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar
Wislocki, G. B., Aub, J. C., and Waldo, C. M. 1947. The effects of gonadectomy and the administration of testosterone propionate on the growth of antlers in male and female deer. Endocrinology 40:202–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witschi, E. 1961. Sex and secondary sexual characters. Pp. 115–168in Marshall, A. J., ed. Biology and comparative physiology of birds. Vol. 2. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodburne, M. O. 1968. The cranial myology and osteology of Dicotyles tajacu, the collared peccary, and its bearing on classification. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 7:1–48.Google Scholar
Wright, D. B. 1989. Phylogenetic relationships of Catagonus wagneri: sister taxa from the late tertiary of North America. Pp. 281–308in Eisenberg, J. F. and Redford, K. H., eds. Advances in Neotropical mammalogy. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, Fla.Google Scholar
Wright, D. B. 1991. Cranial morphology, systematics, and evolution of the Neogene Tayassuidae (Mammalia). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Wright, D. B. In press. Tayassuidae. In Janis, C. M., Jacobs, L. L., and Scott, K. M., eds. Tertiary mammals of North America. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Wright, D. B., and Webb, S. D. 1984. Primitive Mylohyus (Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from the late Hemphillian Bone Valley of Florida. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3:152–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, A. 1977. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology 67:603–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed