Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:22:22.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation of Density Banding in Reef Coral Skeletons With Environmental Parameters: The Basis for Interpretation of Chronological Records Preserved in the Coralla of Corals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Jon N. Weber ,
Eugene W. White  and
Patricia H. Weber
Jon N. Weber
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Eugene W. White
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Patricia H. Weber
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many species of scleractinian reef corals deposit aragonite skeletons with cyclic bands of higher and lower density whose periodicity is annual. As these growth bands are frequently preserved in fossil corals, attention has been focused on their possible use as environmental indicators in as much as density variations may reflect changes in water temperature and/or light intensity. Relationships between skeletal growth banding and environmental parameters have been investigated by X-radiographic examination of 1488 specimens of modern reef corals representing 31 reef localities widely distributed over the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean regions. Average monthly seawater temperature and solar radiation data are available for each locality, and the date of collection is known for each sample. Of the 47 genera and subgenera included in the study, density variations were most pronounced in skeletons of Astreopora, Coscinarea, Cyphastrea, Favia (especially species with small corallites such as F. stelligera), Goniastrea, Hydnophora (massive forms only, e.g. M. microconos), Leptoria, Montastrea (especially M. annularis, with small corallites), Pavona, Polyastra, and Plesiastrea. Less useful are Diploastrea, Diploria, and Favites (which tend to have large corallite diameters), and Goniopora, Alveopora, Porites, Siderastrea, and Stephanaria (which frequently exhibit numerous secondary density variations within the annual cycle). Despite considerable variability among different individual corals from the same population, the average thickness of the skeletal growth bands is positively correlated with mean annual water temperature. By comparing characteristics of the outermost growth increment and the date of collection with monthly records of water temperature and solar radiation, it appears that maximum skeletal density is associated with those periods of the year when seawater temperature is above average.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Spring 1975 , pp. 137 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ashbel, D. 1961. New World Maps of Global Solar Radiation During I.G.Y. (International Geophysical Year). 16 pp. The Hebrew University; Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Bak, R. P. M. 1973. Coral weight increment in situ. A new method to determine coral growth. Marine Biology. 20:45–49.Google Scholar
Buddemeier, R. W. 1974. Environmental controls over annual and lunar monthly cycles in hermatypic coral calcification. Proc. 2nd Int. Sympos. Coral Reefs, Australia, 2:259–267.Google Scholar
Buddemeier, R. W., and Kinzie, R. A. 1974. The chronometric reliability of contemporary corals. Paper presented at Interdisciplinary Winter Conference on Biological Clocks and Changes in the Earth's Rotation, Newcastle upon Tyne, Jan. 8–10.Google Scholar
Buddemeier, R. W., Maragos, J. E., and Knutson, D. K. 1974. Radiographic studies of reef coral exoskeletons: rates and patterns of growth. J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecol. 14:179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloud, P. E. Jr., Schmidt, R. G., and Burke, H. W. 1956. Geology of Saipan, Mariana Islands, Part I, General Geology. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper. 280-A:1–126.Google Scholar
Dodge, R. E., Aller, R. C., and Thomson, J. 1974. Coral growth related to resuspension of bottom sediments. Nature. 247:574–577.Google Scholar
Knutson, D. K., and Buddemeier, R. W. 1973. Distributions of radionuclides in reef corals. Opportunity for data retrieval and study of effects. Internat. Atomic Energy Agency [Vienna] Publ. SM-158/49:735–746.Google Scholar
Knutson, D. K., Buddemeier, R. W., and Smith, S. V. 1972. Coral chronometers: seasonal growth bands in reef corals. Science. 177:270–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, J. B., Axelsen, F., Goodbody, I., Page, C., and Chislett, G. 1968. Comparative growth rates of some reef corals in the Caribbean. Marine Sciences Manuscript Rept. No. 10, McGill University, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Macintyre, I. G., and Smith, S. V. 1974. X-radiographic studies of skeletal development in coral colonies. Proc. 2nd Int. Sympos. Coral Reefs, Australia. 2:277–287.Google Scholar
Mesolella, K. J., Sealy, H. A., and Matthews, R. K. 1970. Facies geometries within Pleistocene reefs of Barbados, West Indies. Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 54:1899–1917.Google Scholar
Moore, W. S., and Krishnaswami, S. 1974. Correlation of X-radiography revealed banding in corals with radiometric growth rates. Proc. 2nd Int. Sympos. Coral Reefs, Australia. 2:269–276.Google Scholar
Piggin, I. G. 1972. Diurnal asymmetries in global radiation. Arch. Met. Geoph. Biokl., Ser. B 20:41–48.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1968. World Weather Records. 6. 605 pp. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Weber, J. N., and White, E. W. 1974a. Activation energy for skeletal aragonite deposited by the hermatypic scleractinian coral Platygyra. Marine Biol., in press.Google Scholar
Weber, J. N., and White, E. W. 1974b. Long-term growth rate data for the Caribbean reef corals Montastrea annularis and Montastrea cavernosa by skeletal X-radiography. Proc. 7th Caribbean Geological Conf., Guadeloupe, in press.Google Scholar