Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T10:24:06.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emas National Park and the plight of the Brazilian cerrados

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Kent H Redford
Kent H Redford
Affiliation:
Florida State Museum, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Brazil's Emas National Park protects important populations of the endangered pampas deer, giant anteaters, armadillos, rheas and many other mammals and birds, but its road and river boundaries are not the best that could be provided to protect this valuable cerrado Park. Uncontrolled fires are also a problem, killing giant anteaters and destroying gallery forest. The author spent two years doing research in central Brazil and visited the Park many times.

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 1985 , pp. 210 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1985

References

Anon. n.d. Cerrado, Terra Para Agricultura. Embrapa.Google Scholar
Anon. 1981. Plano de Manejo. Parque Nacional das Emas. Doct. tec. No. 4, MA IBDF and FBCN.Google Scholar
Anon. 1982a. Plano do Sistema de Unidades de Conservaçāo do Brasil. MA IBDF and FBCN.Google Scholar
Anon. 1982b. Anuario Estatistico do Brasil. Fund. Inst. Bras. Geogr. Estat., Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Eiten, G. 1972. The cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Bot. Rev. 38, 201–341.Google Scholar
Erize, F. 1977. Brazil's Finest National Park. Oryx, 13, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodland, A.J. and Irwin, H.S. 1976. Amazonian forest and cerrado: development and environmental conservation. In Extinction is Forever (Eds Prance, G. T and Elias, T. S). New York Botanical Gardens, Bronx, New York.Google Scholar
Nogueira, E., Braga, M.A., Estel de Figueiredo, M., Medina Arrais, M.G. and Viana, R.B. 1978. Levantamento geo-ecologico e cultural no Parque Nacional das Emas. Univ. catolica de Goias, Goiania (unpublished).Google Scholar
Pereira, S.M., Schuerholz, G. and Bastos, E.K. 1981. Parque Nacional das Emas. Apendice ao piano de Manejo (Trabalho de Campo).Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. 1981. Final report to IBDF on research conducted in Brazil from March 1980 to October 1981 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. 1982. Prey attraction as a possible function of bioluminescence in the larvae of Pyrearinus termitil-luminans (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Revta. bras. Zool Sāo Paulo, 1, 31–34.Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. 1983. Lista preliminar de mamíferos do Parque Nacional das Emas. Brasil Florestal, 55, 29–33.Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. 1984. The termitaria of Comitermes cumulans (Isoptera, Termitidae) and their role in determining a potential keystone species. Biotropica, 16, 112–119.Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. in press. The pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezo-articus) in Central Brazil. In The biology of the Cervidae (Ed. Wenner, C). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Redford, K.H. and Fonseca, G.A.B. 1985. Zoogeography of the cerrado mammalian fauna and the role of gallery forests. Biotropica.Google Scholar
Schaller, G.B. and Duplaix-Hall, N. 1975. Notes on the large mammals of Parque Nacional das Emas, Brazil, (unpublished).Google Scholar