Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T21:23:01.556Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Plurality of Divine Persons’ and the Quotations in Hebrews I. 6ff.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Studies
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 270 note 1 For a representative Jewish reply an interesting passage in the Palestinian Talmud may be consulted, Berakoth 12d–13a (on Mishn. Ber. 9. 1–2) (Schwab, M., Le Talmud de Jérusalem, Tome I, Paris, 1871, pp. 153 f.). The Minim, who here are clearly Christians, are said to have appealed to the plural of the word ‘Elohim’ in Gen. i. I; to the word ‘us’ in Gen. i. 26; to the three different names for God in Josh. xxii. 22; and so on.Google Scholar

page 272 note 1 Brief accounts of this may be found in Moule, C. F. D., The Birth of the New Testament (London, 1962), pp. 77–9Google Scholar, and in Bruce's, F. F.The Epistle to the Hebrews (London, 1964), p. 22.Google Scholar

page 272 note 2 Op. cit. pp. 22 f.Google Scholar