Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-77ffc5d9c7-6tv98 Total loading time: 0.276 Render date: 2021-04-23T09:18:09.838Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Nationalities Papers Nationalities Papers

Article contents

Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Licia Cianetti  and
Jelena Lončar
Licia Cianetti
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
Jelena Lončar
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of York, York, UK Faculty of Political Science, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. Email: loncar.jelena@gmail.com
Corresponding
E-mail address:
loncar.jelena@gmail.com
Save pdf (0.68 megabytes)Save pdf (0.68 mb)
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent years have brought a remarkable shift in the theory of political representation. Our understanding of representation has moved beyond the traditional static and unidirectional approach, which envisions representatives as simply responding (more or less successfully) to their constituents' needs and demands. We now know that representation is a dynamic and multidirectional process in which the representatives' claims at least partially construct the constituents' interests (Saward 2010). Thus, constructivist scholars have convinced us that representation is not merely about responding to the preexisting and static interests of constituents; rather, it is a dynamic process in which representatives also construct their constituencies' interests, views, and perceptions through the claims-making process. This theoretical shift is most often advanced in discussions of women's representation (Campbell, Childs, and Lovenduski 2010; Celis et al. 2014), but it is bound to have a strong impact also on the study of ethnic minority representation in contemporary democracies. Indeed, if representation is a two-way process through which politically relevant constituencies are constructed, this should apply to ethnocultural minorities, whose “groupness” (Brubaker 2004) cannot be taken as fixed and prepolitical.

Type
Special Section: Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges Guest Editors: Licia Cianetti and Jelena Lončar
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 197 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

References

Anwar, Muhammad. 2001. “The Participation of Ethnic Minorities in British Politics.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 27 (3): 533–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banducci, Susan A., Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey A. 2004. “Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation.” The Journal of Politics 66 (2): 534–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloemraad, Irene. 2013. “Accessing the Corridors of Power: Puzzles and Pathways to Understanding Minority Representation.” West European Politics 36 (3): 652–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Franklin D. Gilliam, Jr. 1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment.” The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Kimball, Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1987. “Does Redistricting Aimed to Help Blacks Necessarily Help Republicans?” The Journal of Politics 49 (1): 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Rosie, Childs, Sarah, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2010. “Do Women Need Women Representatives?” British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Lena Krook, Mona. 2014. “Constituting Women's Interests Through Representative Claims.” Politics & Gender 10 (2): 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Christopher J. 2014. “Collective Descriptive Representation and Black Voter Mobilization in 2008.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2002. “Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship Between Citizens and Their Government.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 717–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1999. “Representing Diversity.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurin, Patricia, Hatchett, Shirley, and Jackson, James S. 1989. Hope and Independence: Blacks’ Response to Electoral and Party Politics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke, Shah, Paru, White, Ismail, and Kristine, Kay. 2013. Black Candidates and Black Turnout: A Study of Mayoral Elections in Louisiana. Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.'.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschall, Melissa J., and Ruhil, Anirudh V. S. 2007. “Substantive Symbols: The Attitudinal Dimension of Black Political Incorporation in Local Government.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, and Cosgrove, Kenneth M. 1996. “Unintended Consequences? Racial Redistricting and the Representation of Minority Interests.” The Journal of Politics 58 (2): 540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severs, Eline, Celis, Karen, and Meier, Petra. 2013. “Representative Claims and Beyond: A Study of Muslim Women's Inclusion in the Flemish Headscarf Debate.” Politics, Groups and Identities 1 (3): 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Lester K., McClerking, Harwood K., and Brown, Robert. 2009. “Revisiting Black Incorporation and Local Political Participation.” Urban Affairs Review 45 (2): 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2001. “The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (4): 623–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teney, Celine, Jacobs, Dirk, Andrea, Rea, and Delwit, Pascal. 2010. “Ethnic Voting in Brussels: Voting Patterns among Ethnic Minorities in Brussels (Belgium) During the 2006 Local Elections.” Acta Politica 45 (3): 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Lise. 2008. “The Political Representation of Ethnic Minorities: Denmark as a Deviant Case.” Party Politics 14 (3): 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Michiko. 2008. The Impact of Minority Representation on Policy Outcomes: Evidence from the U.S. States. Social Science Working Paper 1284. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R. 1984. “Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 65 (2): 328–335.Google Scholar
Zuber, Christina Isabel. 2013. “Whose Mobilisation? An Ontological Primer on the Mobilisation of National Minorities.” In New Nation States and National Minorities, edited by Julien Danero Iglesias, Nenad Stojanović, and Weinblum, Sharon, 191–207. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 90 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th November 2018 - 23rd April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Representation of minorities: perspectives and challenges
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *