Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T21:15:06.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An inquiry into the linkage among nationalizing policies, democratization, and ethno-nationalist conflict: the Kurdish case in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Demet Yalcin Mousseau
Demet Yalcin Mousseau*
Affiliation:
International Relations, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
*
*Email: dyalcin@ku.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the effects of nationalizing policies of the state, processes of democratization, and uneven socio-economic development on the rise of Kurdish ethno-mobilization led by the PKK terrorist organization since the 1980s in Turkey. Three features of the Turkish modernization context are identified as conducive for the rise and continuation of Kurdish ethno-mobilization: a) a nation-building autocratic state that resisted granting cultural rights and recognition for the Kurds; b) democratization with the exclusion of ethnic politics and rights; c) economic regional inequality that coincided with the regional distribution of the Kurdish population. It is argued that autocratic policies of the state during nation-building accompanied the development of an illiberal democracy and intolerance for cultural pluralism. These aspects of Turkish democracy seem to be incompatible with both the liberal and consociational models of democracy that accommodate ethnicity within multiculturalism.

Keywords

democratization and ethnic conflictethno-nationalist mobilizationKurdish conflict in Turkeynationalizing state and ethnic conflicthuman rights
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 45 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmad, F. The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Ayata, A. G. “Roots and Trends of Clientelism in Turkey.” Democracy, Clientelism and Civil Society. Eds. Roniger, L. & Gunes-Ayata, A. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994. 40–63. Print.Google Scholar
Barkey, H. J. “Turkey, Islamic Politics and the Kurdish Question.” World Policy Journal 13. 1 (1996). Print.Google Scholar
Bonacich, Edna. “A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market.” American Sociological Review 37 (October) 1972: 547–59. Print.Google Scholar
Brass, Paul. Ethnic Groups and the State. Worcester: Billing and Sons Limited, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Brown, Cliff, and Boswell, Terry. “Strikebreaking or Solidarity in the Great Steel Strike of 1919: A Split Labor Market, Game Theoretic, and QCA Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (May 1995): 1479–519. Print.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. “National Minorities, Nationalizing States, and External National Homelands in the New Europe.” Daedalus 124 (Spring 1995): 107–32. Print.Google Scholar
Connor, Walker. Ethnonationalism. The Quest for Understanding. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc F. (eds). Nationalism. Ethnic Conflict, and Democracy. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Ellingsen, Tanja. “Colorful Community or Ethnic Witches’ Brew? Multiethnicity and Domestic Conflict during and after the Cold War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (April 2000): 228–49. Print.Google Scholar
Ergil, Dogu. “The Eastern Question: Surveys and Results.” Cultural and Structural Identity Problems in Eastern and Southeastern Turkey (in Turkish). Ed. Umit Özdag. Ankara: Turkish Metal Union, 1995. Print.Google Scholar
Ergil, Dogu. “The Kurdish Question in Turkey.” Journal of Democracy 11.3 (2000): 122–35. Print.Google Scholar
Galletti, Mirella. “The Kurdish Issue in Turkey.” The International Spectator 34 (January-March 1999): 123–34. Print.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington D.C: United States Institute of Peace, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael. Internal Colonialism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1975. Print.Google Scholar
Heper, Metin. “Strong State as a Problem for the Consolidation of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 25.2 (1992): 169–94. Print.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: U of California, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. “Democracy in Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 4 (October 1993): 18–83. Print.Google Scholar
İnalcik, Halil. “The Nature of Traditional Society: Turkey.” Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey. Eds. Ward, Robert E. and Rostow, Dankwart A. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1964. 3–24. Print.Google Scholar
Kirisci, Kemal. 2000. “Disaggregating Turkish Citizenship and Immigrant Practices.” Middle Eastern Studies 36. 3(2000): 1–22. Print.Google Scholar
Kubicek, Paul. “The Earthquake, Europe, and Prospects for Political Change in Turkey.” Middle East Review of International Affairs 5 (June 2001): 1–12. Print.Google Scholar
Kuzio, Taras. “Nationalising States or State-building? A Critical Review of the Theoretical Literature and Empirical Evidence.” Nations and Nationalism 7.2 (2001): 135–54. Print.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale UP, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
McDowall, D. A Modern History of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
McKay, James. “An Explanatory Synthesis of Primordial and Mobilizationist Approaches to Ethnic Phenomena.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 5 (October 1982): 395–420. Print.Google Scholar
Melson, Robert, and Wolpe, Howard. “Modernization and the Politics of Communalism: A Theoretical Perspective.” American Political Science Review 64 (December 1970): 1112–30. Print.Google Scholar
Meyer, James H. “Politics as Usual: Ciller, Refah and Susurluk: Turkey's Troubled Democracy.” East European Quarterly 32 (January 1999): 489–502. Print.Google Scholar
Mousseau, Demet Y. “Democratizing with Ethnic Differences: A Source of Conflict?’ Journal of Peace Research 38.5 (2001): 547–67. Print.Google Scholar
Mousseau, Demet Y. “Democracy, Human Rights and Market Development in Turkey: Are They Related?” Government and Opposition 41.2 (2006): 298–326. Print.Google Scholar
Mutlu, Servet. “Ethnic Kurds in Turkey: A Demographic Study.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28 (November 1996): 517–41. Print.Google Scholar
Newman, Saul. “Does Modernization Breed Ethnic Political Conflict?” World Politics 43 (April 1991): 451–78. Print.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
Okutan, M. C. Minority Policies during the Period of One-Party Rule (in Turkish). Istanbul: Bilgi U Publications, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Olzak, Susan and Nagel, Joanne. Competitive Ethnic Relations. New York: Academic, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Özdag, Umit (ed). Cultural and Structural Identity Problems in Eastern and Southeastern Turkey (in Turkish). Ankara: Turkish Metal Union, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Peleg, Ilan. “Transforming Ethnic Orders to Pluralist Regimes.” Democracy and Ethnic Conflict. Ed. Guelke, Adrian. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. 7–25. Print.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Joseph. Ethnopolitics: A Conceptual Framework. New York: Columbia UP, 1981. Print.Google Scholar
Sahan, Emel, Zogg, Andreas, and Mason, Simon A. “Case Study: Southeastern Anatolia Project in Turkey-GAP.” Paper presented at the ETH, Center for International Studies, Zurich. 2001. Web. January 2010. http://www.eawag.ch/research_e/apec/damsworldwide_e.html.Google Scholar
Şahin, Ismet, and Gulmez, Yener. “Efficiency of Education: The Case in Eastern and Southeastern Turkey.” Social Indicators Research 49 (February 2000): 213–36. Print.Google Scholar
Scott, George M. “A Resynthesis of the Primordial and Circumstantial Approaches to Ethnic Group Solidarity: Towards an Explanatory Model.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 13 (April 1990): 147–71. Print.Google Scholar
Sezer, Haluk. “Regional Welfare Weights for Turkey.” Journal of Economic Studies 33 (October 2006): 357–68. Print.Google Scholar
Sirkeci, Ibrahim. “Exploring the Kurdish Population in the Turkish Context.” Genus 56.1–2 (2000): 149–75. Print.Google Scholar
Smooha, Sammy. “Types of Democracy and Modes of Conflict Management in Ethnically Divided Societies.” Nations and Nationalism 8 (October 2002): 423–31. Print.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack L. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. W. W. Norton & Company: New York, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Tasch, Laman. “Defining Nation and Religious Minorities in Russia and Turkey: A Comparative Analysis.” Politics and Religion 3 (2010): 327–51. Print.Google Scholar
Tomanbay, Mehmet. “Turkey's Water Potential and the Southeast Anatolia Project.” Water Balances in the Eastern Meditterranean. Eds. David B. Brooks and Ozay Mehmet Ottowa: International Development Center, 2000. 95–112. Print.Google Scholar
Turan, liter. “Unstable Stability: Turkish Politics at the Crossroads?” International Affairs 83 (March 2007): 319–38. Print.Google Scholar
White, P.J. “Economic Marginalization of Turkey's Kurds: The Failed Promise of Modernization and Reform.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 18.1 (1998): 139–58. Print.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. “Who Owns the State? Understanding Ethnic Conflict in Post-Colonial Societies.” Nations and Nationalism 3.4 (1997): 631–65. Print.Google Scholar
Zürcher, Eric J. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76 (November/December 1997): 23–43. Print.Google Scholar