Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T00:51:28.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agile small state agency: heuristic plays and flexible national identity markers in Finnish foreign policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Mika Aaltola*
Affiliation:
The Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Studies of small state foreign policy tend to draw relatively bleak conclusions when it comes to small state agency. However, I will examine alternative and more positive modalities of small state agency. One such modality is agility, the strategic maneuverability to take advantage of a chancy environment. Besides leading to dangerous rigidities and biases, particular types of foreign policy imageries and heuristics may also facilitate experimental and agile agency. In studying this possibility, Finland is chosen as an illustrative case because historically Finland has faced a particularly constraining geopolitical context and because it has managed to adapt to multiple upheavals and to different geopolitical contexts. The emphasis is on the heuristic dynamics inherent in Finnish foreign policy culture that have allowed it to actively meet the emerging challenges. Instead of taking a detailed historical approach, I seek to understand the role of the relatively flexible and combinable embodied cultural models, i.e. thick images. They allow for agency-related experimentation that may bring added value that allows Finland to exceed the constraints of the brute geopolitical position. After reviewing multiple embodied foreign policy images, I will use them to analyse New Year's speeches by the Finnish Presidents Ahtisaari and Halonen in order to see how the fickle present is made to resonate innovatively with the known, commonplace, and mythical.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: reflection on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Apter, David. “The New Mytho/Logics and the Specter of Superfluous Man.” Social Research 52 (1985): 269307. Print.Google Scholar
Baillie, Sasha. “A Theory of Small State Infuence in the European Union.” Journal of International Relations and Development 1 (1998): 195219. Print.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. “Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel's Road to Oslo.” European Journal of International Relations 5.5 (1999): 536. Print.Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence. W.Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioral and Brain Science 22 (1999): 577609. Print.Google Scholar
Barston, Ronald Peter, ed. The Other Powers: Studies in the Foreign Policies of Small States. London: Allen and Unwin. 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. “The Aesthetic Turn in International Political Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30.3 (2001): 509–33. Print.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher. Constructivism, Narrative and Foreign Policy Analysis: A Case Study of Finland. London: Peter Lang, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher. “From “East-West” to “New Europe-Old Europe”: The American Challenge to Finnish Identity.” The Baltic States and Their Region: New Europe or Old. Ed. James Smith, David. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005. 1140. Print.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher. “Lännen ja Venäjän suhteet lämpenevät: pohjoinen ulottuvuus syyskuun 11. päivän terrori-iskujen jälkeen.” Ulkopolitiikka 39.2 (2002): 3340. Print.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher, and Lehti, Marko. “Beyond East-West: Marginality and National Dignity in Finnish Identity Construction.” Nationalities Papers, 35.4 (2007): 691716. Print.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors.” Cognition 75 (2000): 128. Print.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary. The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200. London: Cambridge UP. 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. “The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships.” International Security 24.4 (2000): 116–56. Print.Google Scholar
David, Steven. “Explaining Third World Alignment.” World Politics 43 (1991): 233–56. Print.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. Intepretive Interactionalism 16. London: Sage, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
de Sousa, Ronald. “Desire and Serendipity.” Midwestern Studies in Philosophy 22 (1999): 120–34. Print.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul. “Why Cognitive (and Cultural) Sociology Needs Cognitive Psychology.” Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition. Ed. Cerulo, Karen. New York: Routledge. 2002. 274–81. Print.Google Scholar
East, Maurice. “Size and Foreign Policy Behavior: A Test of Two Models.” World Politics 25.4 (1973): 3049. Print.Google Scholar
Enders, Jody. The Medieval Theater of Cruelty: Rhetoric, Memory, Violence. New York: Cornell UP. 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Tuomas, and Pursiainen, Christer. “Crisis Decision-Making in Finland: Cognition, Institutions, and Rationality.” Cooperation and Conflict 41.3 (2006): 235–60. Print.Google Scholar
Forsberg, Tuomas, and Vaahtoranta, Tapani. “Inside NATO: Paradoxes of Finland's and Sweden's Post-Neutrality.” European Security 10.1 (2001): 6893. Print.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. We Now Know. London: Oxford UP. 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan. The European Community: A Superpower in the Making. Oslo: Universitets-förlaget. 1973. Print.Google Scholar
Hakovirta, Harto. “The Soviet Union and the Varieties of Neutrality in Western Europe.” World Politics 35.4 (1983): 563–85. Print.Google Scholar
Harle, Vilho. The Enemy with a Thousand Faces: The Tradition of the Other in Western Political Thought and History. London: Praeger Publishers. 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Harle, Vilho. Martti Ahtisaari, A Global Rationalist. Northern Dimensions Yearbook. Ulkopoliittinen instituutti: Helsinki. 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Harle, Vilho, and Moisio, Saami. Missä on Suomi? Kansallisen identiteettipolitiikan historia ja geopolitiikka. Vastapaino, Tampere. 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the ‘Winter of Disconten'.” Sociology 30.2 (1996): 253–77. Print.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, Voss, James, Schooler, Tonya, and Ciarrochi, Joseph. “Images in International Relations: An Experimental Test of Cognitive Schemata.” International Studies Quarterly 41.3 (1997): 403–33. Print.Google Scholar
Hey, Jeanne A.K.Luxembourg's Foreign Policy: Does Small Size Help or Hinder?Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 15 (2002): 211–25. Print.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. “Introduction: Inventing Tradition.” The Invention of Tradition. Ed. Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 1983. 125. Print.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kaj J.Politics in Command: Foreign Trade as National Security Policy.” International Organization 40.3 (1986): 643–71. Print.Google Scholar
Ignatow, Gabriel. “Theories of Embodied Knowledge: New Directions for Cultural and Cognitive Sociology.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37. 2 (2007): 115–35. Print.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton. UP. 1976. Print.Google Scholar
Joenniemi, Pertti. “Norden Beyond Security Community.” The Nordic Peace. Ed. Joenniemi, Pertti and Archer, Clive. London: Ashgate, 2003. 171–97. Print.Google Scholar
Jones, Rhys. “Relocating Nationalism: On the Geographies of Reproducing Nations.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers - New Series 33 (2008): 319–34.Google Scholar
Karp, Regina. “The Conditionality of Security Integration: Identity and Alignment Choices in Finland and Sweden.” Security Strategies, Power Disparity and Identity: The Baltic Sea Region. Ed. Knudsen, Olav. London: Ashgate, 2007. 4572. Print.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. Small States in World Markets. Ithaca: Cornell UP. 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U of Chicago P. 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Kovecses, Zoltan. “The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in American English.” Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Ed. Holland, Dorothy and Quinn, Naomi. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987. 195221. Print.Google Scholar
Majander, Mikko. “The Paradoxes of Finlandization.” Northern Dimensions (1999): 8594. Print.Google Scholar
Manners, Ian. “Small States and the Internal Balance of the European Union: Institutional Issues.” Enlarging the European Union: The Way Forward. Ed. Gower, Jackie and Redmond, John. Burlington, VT, Ashgate, 2000. 123–35. Print.Google Scholar
McGraw, David J.New Zealand's Foreign Policy Under National and Labour Governments: Variations on the ‘Small State’ Theme?Pacific Affairs 67.1 (1994): 725. Print.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K.The Bearing of Empirical Research on Theory.” American Sociological Review 13 (1948): 505–15. Print.Google Scholar
Möttölä, Kari. “Security Around the Baltic Rim: Concepts, Actors and Process.” The NEBI Yearbook 1998. North European and Baltic Sea Integration. Ed. Hedegaard, Lars and Lindström, Bjarne. Berlin: Springer, 1998. 363404. Print.Google Scholar
Palmgren, Raoul. Suuri linja: Arwidsonista vallankumouksellisiin sosialisteihin: Kansallista tutkimuksia [Great Line]. Helsinki: Kansankulttuuri. 1948. Print.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. Transformation of Ideas on a Periphery: Political Studies in Finnish History. Ed. Kanerva, Jukka and Palonen, Kari. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association, 1987. 98115. Print.Google Scholar
Pearson, Frederic S., and Doerga, Ravi E.The Netherlands and the 1940 Nazi Invasion.” Studies in Crisis Behavior. Ed. Brecher, Michael. Jerusalem: The Hebrew U of Jerusalem, 1978. 2039. Print.Google Scholar
Rhetorica ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. The Symbolism of Evil. Boston: Beacon, 1967. Print.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Robert L. The Weak in the World of the Strong. New York, Columbia UP, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ron. “The Relevance and Function of Diplomacy in International Politics for Small Caribbean States.” The Round Table 312 (1989): 413–24. Print.Google Scholar
Sharrad, Paul. “The Art of Memory and the Liberation of History: Wilson Harri's Witnessing of Time.” Calloloo 18.1 (1995): 94108. Print.Google Scholar
Singer, Marshall. Weak States in a World of Powers. New York, The Free Press, 1972. Print.Google Scholar
Tiilikainen, Teija. “Finland Guided the EU into the New Millennium: The First Test Passed.” The Northern Dimensions 2000. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs: Helsinki, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Tiilikainen, Teija. “Suomen doktriini murtuu: Suomalaisen politiikan kulku Paasikiven-Kekkosen realismista kohti yhteisöllisyyden Eurooppaa.” Ulkopolitiikka 29.4 (1992): 1522. Print.Google Scholar
Vital, David. The Survival of Small States. London: Oxford UP, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Väyrynen, Raimo. “Small states in different theoretical traditions of international relations research.” Small States in Europe and Dependence. Ed. Höll, Otmar. Boulder: Westview, 1983. 3350. Print.Google Scholar
Väyrynen, Raimo. “Stability and Change in Finnish Foreign Policy.” Research Reports 60 Department of Political Science. Helsinki: U of Helsinki, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Väyrynen, Raimo. ed. Suomi avoimessa maailmassa – Globalisaatio ja sen vaikutukset. Helsinki: Taloustieto, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Waever, Ole. “Nordic Nostalgia: Northern Europe after the Cold War.” International Affairs 68. 1 (1992): 77102. Print.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Winkielman, Piotr, Niedenthal, Paula M., and Oberman, Lindsay. “The Embodied Emotional Mind.” Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches. Ed. Semin, Gun R. and Smith, Eliot R. New York: Cambridge UP, 2008. 263–88. Print.Google Scholar
Young, Michael D., and Schafer, Mark. “Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations.” Mershon International Studies Review 42.1 (1998): 6396. Print.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar. Social Mindscpapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar