Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:01:29.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Spatial Resolution Thermal Conductivity investigation of SiC Wafers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

D.I. Florescu
Affiliation:
Physics Department and New York State Center for Advanced Technology in Ultrafast Photonic Materials and Applications, Brooklyn College of CUNY, Brooklyn, NY 11210
Fred H. Pollak
Affiliation:
Physics Department and New York State Center for Advanced Technology in Ultrafast Photonic Materials and Applications, Brooklyn College of CUNY, Brooklyn, NY 11210
G.R. Brande
Affiliation:
ATMI, Inc., 7 Commerce Drive, Danbury, CT 06810
B.E. Landini
Affiliation:
ATMI, Inc., 7 Commerce Drive, Danbury, CT 06810
A.D. Salant
Affiliation:
ATMI, Inc., 7 Commerce Drive, Danbury, CT 06810
Get access

Abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC) is a material with very attractive properties for high power/high temperature electronic devices. Its mechanical strength, high thermal conductivity ( κ), large bandgap, and extreme chemical inertness are a few of the characteristics making SiC interesting for semiconductor electronics. Due to the significant head load generated over large areas in high power devices, it is desirable forthe thermal properties of the substrate to be uniform and optimal. Scanning thermal microscopy (SThM), which provides nondestructive, absolute measurements of the thermal conductivity with a spatial/depth resolution in the 2-3 μm range, was used to examine the room temperature κ as a function of position of four 2” diameter SiC wafers. Wafers of 4H and 6H polytype were fabricated with carrier concentrations in the(1-3)×1018 cm−3 and (6-9)×1017 cm−3 ranges, respectively. A radial distribution of the thermal conductivity was determined for all the investigated samples. For a radius r < r1 (r1 ∼ 0.3”) and r > r2 (r2 ∼ 0.7”) highest thermal conductivity values were measured in the range of (3.8-3.9) W/cm-K, comparable to the highest κ reported for this material [D. Morelli et al., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 137, 313 (1993); E.A. Burgemeister,.et al., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 5790 (1979)]. For r1 < r < r2 the thermal conductivity drops to about (2.85-3.25) W/cm-κinterval. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) investigation revealsthat the influence of surface roughness effects on κ is negligible. The κ dip may arise from a higher basal plane defect density in this region that could be associated with the presence of super screw dislocations, or “micropipes” [M. Dudley et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28, A63 (1995)]. The implications of these findings for device applications and design are considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Pearton, S.J., Zolper, J.C., Shul, R.J., and Ren, F., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 1 (1999).Google Scholar
2See, for examples, in MRS Bull. 22, 17 (1997) and MRS Bull. 22, 22 (1997).Google Scholar
3See, for example, Thermal Conduction in Semiconductors, Bandhari, C.M. and D.M. Rowe(Wiley, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
4 Morelli, D. et al., Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 137, 313 (1993); E.A. Burgemeister et al., J. Appl. Phys. 50, 5790 (1979).Google Scholar
5ThermoMicroscopes/Park Instruments; 1171 Borregas Avenue; Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (www.thermomicro.com).Google Scholar
6 Asnin, V.M., Pollak, F.H., Ramer, J., Schurman, M., and Ferguson, I., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1240 (1999).Google Scholar
7 Florescu, D.I., Asnin, V.M., Pollak, F.H., and Molnar, R.J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 595, 3.89.1 (2000).Google Scholar
8 Florescu, D.I., Asnin, V.M., and Pollak, F.H. Compound Semiconductor 7(2), 62 (2001).Google Scholar
9 Florescu, D.I., Asnin, V.M., Pollak, F.H., Jones, A.M., Ramer, J.C., Schurman, M.J., and Ferguson, I., Applied Physics Letters 77,1464 (2000).Google Scholar
10 Florescu, D.I., Mourokh, L.G., Pollak, F.H., Look, D.C., Cantwell, G., and Li, X., submitted to Applied Physics Letters.Google Scholar
11 Dudley, M., Wang, S., Huang, W., Carter, C.H. Jr, Tsvetkov, V., and Fazi, C., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 28, A63 (1995).Google Scholar
12 Chelnokov, V.E., Syrkin, A.L., and Dmitriev, V.A., Diamond Relat. Mater. 6, 1480 (1997).Google Scholar