Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T14:19:53.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molybdate Catalysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Wataru Ueda*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta-cho 4259, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 227Japan
Get access

Abstract

It is possible to classify the solid state catalyst systems into two categories; structure static catalyst and structure dynamic catalyst. The former is the catalyst in which the original structural circumstances of surface active center, such as coordinatively unsaturated state of active element, length and order of metal-ligand bond or of a bond between structural component, and their bond angle, are maintained unchanged during catalysis. The example is molybdenum sulfid which is a good catalyst for the isomerization and hydrogenation of olefins. On the contrary, the catalysts, in which the above circumstances of surface active center are changing dynamically during catalysis, are classified into the latter category. Molybdate catalysts for olefin oxidation by molecular oxygen at high temperature belong to this category. Main difference between two categories is whether the originally coordinated ligand on metal cation, such as sulfur anion of molybdenum sulfid and oxygen anion of metal molybdate, can participate in the catalysis directly or not. When the coordinated ligand is involved in the reaction, resulting abnormal coordinatively unsaturated state of surface active center must be sustained by the dynamic structure changes of both surface and bulk for the steady state catalysis. The bulk structure, therefore, affects strongly the properties of structure dynamic catalysts, whereas the properties of structure static catalysts depend on the surface structure like coner and edge mainly. The relationship between catalytic properties and structural stability of molybdate catalysts in the selective oxidation of propylene was discussed on the basis of 18O tracer study.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Wolfs, M. W. J. and Batist, Ph. A., J. Catal. 32, 25(1974); I. Matsuura and Ph. A. Batist, J. Catal. 37, 174(1975); R. K. Grasselli, J. D. Burrington, and J. F. Brazdil, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 72, 204(1981); T. S. R. Prasada Rao and K. R. Krishnamurthy, J. Catal. 95, 209(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Grasselli, R. K. and Burrington, J. D., Adv. Catal. 30, 133(1981); J. D. Burrington, C. T. Kartisek, and R. K. Burrington, J. Catal. 81, 489(1983); R. K. Grasselli and J. D. Burrington, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 23, 393(1984).Google Scholar
[3] Keulks, G. W., J. Catal. 19, 232(1970).Google Scholar
[4] Wragg, R. D., Ashmore, P. G., and Hockey, J. A., J. Catal. 22, 49(1971), 28, 337(1973).Google Scholar
[5] Moro-oka, Y., Ueda, W., Tanaka, S., and Ikawa, T., in “Proceedings, International Congress on Catalysis,” 7th, (Tokyo, 1980)(T. Seiyama and K. Tanabe, Eds.), Part B, p. 1086. Kodansha, New York/Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981; W. Ueda, Y. Moro-oka, and T. Ikawa, J. Catal. 70, 409(1981); W. Ueda, Y. Moro-oka, and T. Ikawa, J. Catal. 88, 214(1984); W. Ueda, Y. Moro-oka, and T. Ikawa, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 78, 495(1982); W. Ueda, K. Asakawa, C-L. Chen, Y. Moro-oka, and T. Ikawa, J. Catal. 101, 360(1986); W. Ueda, C-L. Chen, K. Asakawa, Y. Moro-oka, and T. Ikawa, J. Catal. 101, 369(1986).Google Scholar
[6] Sleight, A. W., Aykan, K., and Rogers, D. B., J. Solid State Chem. 13 231(1975); A. W. Sleight, “Advanced Materials in Catalysis” p. 181, Academic Press, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
[7] Tanaka, K. and Okuhara, T., Cat. Rev. 15, 249(1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Haber, J., Kinet. Katal. 21, 1(1980).Google Scholar