Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:12:32.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality in Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Tony Bruton
Affiliation:
E.M. Unit, Universfty of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
Steve Chapman*
Affiliation:
Protrain Courses, Buckingham, England
Paul Harding
Affiliation:
Integrated Systems Mgmnt, Nissan Motor Co., Rosslyn, South Africa

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Does quality exist in the electron microscope laboratory? What is quality? Quality is when a product or service meets all of the customers' requirements, is delivered in the correct quantity at the required time, to the right place and at a price the customer is prepared to pay.

In an open competitive environment all of the above would apply. In an electron microscope laboratory are we totally satisfied that we have given consideration to our product? We also provide a service, are we happy that the service we provide is of a sufficiently high standard, a standard that we would expect if we were the customers in a hotel or a garage? If we follow the example of world trends in industry, then simple product and service quality, in isolation, fs no longer sufficient, and focus must be given to a total quality approach.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2003

References

Chapman, S. K. (1986) Checking the performance of the microscope, in: Maintaining and Monitoring The Transmission Electron Microscope (Royal Microscopical Society handbook OS) Available from Protrain $18Google Scholar
Chapman, S, K. (2001-3) Interactive CD Courses - M6 Monitoring & Maintaining the EM. Available from Protrain $100Google Scholar
Haine, M. E. and Mulvey, T. (1954) The regular attainment of very high resolving power in the electron microscope. Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Electron Microscopy, London p. 689.Google Scholar