Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:42:35.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Resolution 3-D Fluorescence Microscopy: A Comparison of Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy and a wide-Field Deconvolution Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Advances in the biological sciences have given rise for the need to visualize microscopic structures of interest. As the requirement to see specific structure and sub-resolution details arise, investigators have turned to fluorescent probes to label and observe these details, which are often undetectable using conventional methods in light microscopy. Fluorescence microscopy offers many advantages for visualizing specific structure and sub-resolution details, which are often undetectable using transmitted light microscopy. Recent advances in fluorescent probe and microscope design, as well as imaging instrumentation designed for fluorescence applications, are now permitting life-science researchers to view details in regions of interest with increasing precision, accuracy, and resolution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

References

1). Inoue, S., 1995. Confocal Scanned Images and Light Microscopy. In: Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, (Pawley, J., ed.), Plenum Press, pp.117.Google Scholar
2). Tsien, R.Y. and Waggoner, A,S, 1990. Fluorophores for confocal microscopy: Photophysics and Photochemistry, in: Handbook o! Biological Confocal Microscopy. (Pawfey, J., ed.﹜. Plenum Press, pp.267274.Google Scholar
3). Weiis, K. David, Sam Sandison, R., Stickler, James, Webb, Watt W.. 1990, Quantity five Fluorescence Imaging with Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy. In: Confocal Microscopy Handbook; (Pawley, J., ed.), IMR Press, pp. 2739.Google Scholar
4). Jonathan J., Art and Miriam, B. Goodman. Rapid Scanning Confocal Microscopy. In: Methods in Celt Biology, Vol.38. (Matsumoto, Brian, ed.). 1993, Academic Press, pp.4777.Google Scholar
5). Carrington, W.A., Image Restoration in 3D Microscopy with Limited Data. SPIE Proceedings, 1990,1205: pp.7283.Google Scholar
6). Walter A., Carrington, Lynch, Ronald M., Moore, Edwin D.W., Isenberg, Gerrit, Fogarty, Kevin E., Fay, Frederic S.. 1995. Superresolutionthtee-dimensional images of fluorescence in cells with minimum liQht exposure. Science. 268:14831487.Google Scholar
7). Kenneth, Carter Douglas Bowman, C, Carrington, Walter, rty, Kevin Foga, McNeil, John A, Fay, Fredeic S., Lawrence, Jeanne Bentley. 1993. A three dimensional view of precursor messenger RNA metabolism within the mammalian nucleus. Science. 259: 13301335.Google Scholar
8). Minsky, M. (1961). U.S. Patent 3,013,467.Google Scholar
9). Carrington, W.A., Fogarty, Kevin E., Lifschitz, Larry, Fay, Frederic S.., 1990. 3D Imaging on Confocal and Wide Field Microscopes. In: Confocal Microscopy Handbook, (Pawley, J., ed.), IMR Press, pp. 151161.Google Scholar
10). Lansing Taylor, D. and Salmon, E.D.. 1989. Basic Fluorescence Microscopy. In: Fluorescence Microscopy in Living Cells in Culture - Part A. (Wang, Y.L. and Lansing Taylor, D., eds.), Academic Press, pp. 223.Google Scholar
11). Spring., K,. ‘Detectors for Fluorescence Microscopy'. Course Notes from Optical Microscopy and Imaging in the Biomedical Sciences'. Marine Biological Laborato ries, Woods Hole, MA (1994).Google Scholar