Literary responses to animal experimentation in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain

Andreas-Holger Maehle

doi:10.1017/S0025727300050250

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

1991. Reviews. The Economic History Review, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 137.

Baker, Robert B. and McCullough, Laurence B. 2008. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics.

Franco, Nuno 2013. Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective. Animals, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 238.

Bertoloni Meli, Domenico 2013. Early Modern Experimentation on Live Animals. Journal of the History of Biology, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 199.

Chamayou, Grégoire 2014. Les corps vils. p. 391.

Li, Chien-hui 2019. Mobilizing Traditions in the First Wave of the British Animal Defense Movement. p. 267.

Lipatov, Vyacheslav A. Kryukov, Aleksey A. Severinov, Dmitry A. and Saakyan, Araik R. 2019. Ethical and legal aspects of in vivo experimental biomedical research. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 80.

Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N. 2022. Psychiatry. p. 127.

Girard, William-Philippe Bertrand-Grenier, Antony and Drolet, Marie-Josée 2022. Animal Experimentation in Oncology and Radiobiology: Arguments for and Against Following a Critical Literature Review. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 107.

Article contents

Literary responses to animal experimentation in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Britain

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests