Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:06:13.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Hayman's alternative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

J. K. Langley
Affiliation:
Department of Pure Mathematics, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland.
Get access

Extract

Suppose that f(z) is non-constant and meromorphic in the plane and that, for some k≥= 1, a0(z),…, ak(z) are meromorphic in the plane with

for j' = 0,…, k. Here, using standard notation from [3], S(r,f) denotes any quantity satisfying S(r,f) = o(T(r,f)) as r→ ∞, possibly outside a set of finite linear measure. Then, setting

we have ([3, p. 57])

Theorem A. Suppose that f(z) is non-constant and meromorphic in the plane, and thatψ (z) given by (1.2) and (1.1) and is non-constant. Then

where N0(r, l/ψ') counts only zeros of ψ' which are not zeros of ψ − 1, and thecounting functions count points without regard to multiplicity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Frank, G. and Mues, E.. Differentialpolynome (Oberwolfach, 1979).Google Scholar
2.Hayman, W. K.. Picard values of meromorphic functions and their derivatives. Ann. of Math., 70 (1959), 942.Google Scholar
3.Hayman, W. K.. Meromorphic Functions (Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar
4.Ince, E. L.. Ordinary Differential Equations (Dover, 1926).Google Scholar
5.Langley, J. K.. On differential polynomials and results of Hayman and Doeringer. Math. Zeit., 187 (1984), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar