Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:37:00.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ownership Concentration and Product Innovation in Chinese Firms: The Mediating Role of Learning Orientation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Yuan Li ,
Hai Guo ,
Yaqun Yi  and
Yi Liu
Yuan Li
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Hai Guo
Affiliation:
Renmin University of China, China
Yaqun Yi
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Yi Liu
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on institutional theory, this study empirically examines the relationship between a firm's levels of ownership concentration and product innovation and the mediating effect of learning orientation, using a sample of 351 Chinese firms. Does ownership concentration hinder or promote firm innovation? Perspectives on this relationship are divergent. This study examines the link between ownership concentration and product innovation and further examines whether and how ownership influences firm innovation through organizational learning. The results suggest that ownership concentration has an inverse U-shaped relationship to product innovation and to learning orientation. In addition, learning orientation mediates the curvilinear relationship between ownership concentration and product innovation. We discuss the study's contributions, managerial implications and directions for future research.

Keywords

innovationinstitutional theorylearning orientationownership concentration创新、制度理论、学习导向、股权集中度
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 77 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagozzi, R. P. 1980. Causal models in marketing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. 1999. The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4): 411–427.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 51(6): 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1): 205–214.Google Scholar
Calantone, R.J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. 2002. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6): 515–524.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2): 81–105.Google Scholar
Chen, M.J. 2001. Inside Chinese business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3): 305–324.Google Scholar
Dess, G. G., Ireland, R. D., Zahra, S. A., Floyd, S. W., Janney, J. J., & Lane, P.J. 2003. Emerging issues in corporate entvepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 351–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dharwadkar, B., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3): 650–669.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. 1985. Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 803–813.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.Google Scholar
Fu, P. P., Tsui, A. S., & Dess, G. G. 2006. The dynamics of guanxi in Chinese high-tech firms: Implications for knowledge management and decision making. Management International Review, 46(3): 277–305.Google Scholar
Gadhoum, Y. 1999. Potential effects of managers' entrenchment and shareholdings on competitiveness. European Journal of Operational Research, 118(2): 332–349.Google Scholar
Gedajlovic, E. R., & Shapiro, D. M. 1998. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6): 533–553.Google Scholar
Graves, S. B. 1988. Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2): 417–427.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. S., & Hill, C. W. L. 1991. Are institutional investors myopic? A time-series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. C. 2004. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4): 500–520.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Li, H., & Worthington, W. J. IV, 2005. Emerging markets as learning laboratories: Learning behaviors of local firms and foreign entrants in different institutional contexts. Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 353–380.Google Scholar
James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. 1984. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2): 307–321.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–350.Google Scholar
Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. 2008. Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: Evidence from the retail industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 401–423.Google Scholar
Lee, P. M., & O'Neill, H. M. 2003. Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 212–225.Google Scholar
Li, Y., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Developing theory from strategic management research in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3): 563–572.Google Scholar
Li, H., & Zhang, Y. 2007. The role of managers' political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8): 791–804.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Sun, Y., & Liu, Y. 2006. An empirical study of SOEs' market orientation in transitional China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1): 93–113.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Guo, H., Liu, Y., & Li, M. 2008. Incentive mechanisms, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology commercialization: Evidence from China's transitional economy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(1): 63–78.Google Scholar
Liu, S. S., Luo, X., & Shi, Y. 2002. Integrating customer orientation, corporate entrepreneurship, and learning orientation in organizations-in-transition: An empirical study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4): 367–382.Google Scholar
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135–172.Google Scholar
Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B. 2005. The role of organizational learning in the opportunity recognition process. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(4): 451–472.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. 1991. Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15(1): 47–70.Google Scholar
Mavondo, F. T., Chimhanzi, J., & Stewart, J. 2005. Learning orientation and market orientation: Relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11/12): 1235–1263.Google Scholar
Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3): 655–720.Google Scholar
National Statistics Bureau of China. 2003. Division standard of large/medium/small sized enterprises, no. 17. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
Nee, V., & Cao, Y. 2005. Market transition and the firm: Institutional change and income inequality in urban China. Management and Organization Review, 1(1): 23–56.Google Scholar
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2002. Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2): 251–267.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2003. Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 275–286.Google Scholar
Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economics. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 920–936.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.Google Scholar
Rediker, K., & Seth, A. 1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16(2): 85–99.Google Scholar
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1980. Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4): 653–664.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3): 461–488.Google Scholar
Slater, S. E., & Narver, J. C. 1995. Market orientation and learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3): 63–74.Google Scholar
Stevens, G., Burley, J., & Divine, R. 1999. Creativity + business discipline = Higher profits faster from new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(5): 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y., Xu, D., & Phan, P. H. 2008. Principal–principal conflict in the governance of the Chinese public corporation. Management and Organization Review, 4(1): 17–38.Google Scholar
Thompson, V. A. 1965. Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tsui, A., Wang, H., & Xin, K. 2006. Organizational culture in China: An analysis of culture dimensions and culture types. Management and Organization Review, 2(3): 345–376.Google Scholar
Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K., & Hitt, M. 2003. Organizational transformation in transition economies: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2): 257–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X., & Wang, Y. 1999. Ownership structure and coiporate governance in Chinese stock companies. China Economic Review, 10(1): 75–98.Google Scholar
Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economics: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 197–219.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A. 1996. Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1713–1735.Google Scholar
Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. 2004. Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5): 885–897.Google Scholar
Zhou, K., Gao, G., Yang, Z., & Zhou, N. 2005. Developing strategic orientation in China: Antecedents and consequences of market and innovation orientations. Journal of Business Research, 58(8): 1049–1058.Google Scholar