Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:08:39.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Never the Twain Shall Meet? Integrating Chinese and Western Management Research

Part of: Cross Cultural Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Kwok Leung
Kwok Leung*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This commentary offers several directions for the development of Chinese management research based on the penetrating analyses provided by Barney and Zhang (2009) and Whetten (2009). First and foremost, Chinese management researchers can develop novel, seminal ideas and theories that are not necessarily tied to the Chinese cultural context but are applicable in diverse cultural contexts. The success of this approach depends on the merit of the ideas and theories proposed. A fusion, or combined emic–etic approach, can also be attempted, which integrates elements from Western and indigenous theories. Finally, the synergistic approach involves a dynamic interplay of Chinese and Western management research, which will eventually lead to innovative, culture-general theories. This article argues that all three approaches should be emphasized in Chinese management research.

Keywords

Chinese managementcombined emic–etic approachindigenous researchsynergistic approach混合 “主位–客位” 方法本土研究协同方法华人管理
Type
Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 121 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2009

References

Barnett, D. 1967. Quotations from chairman Mao Tse-Tung. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review,5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. 1990. Imposed etics, emics, and derived etics: Their conceptual and operational status in cross-cultural psychology. In Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., & Harris, M. (Eds.), Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate: 84–99. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brett, J. M., Tinsley, C. H., Janssens, M., Barsness, Z. I., & Lytle, A. L. 1997. New approaches to the study of culture in industrial/organizational psychology. In Earley, P. C. & Erez, M. (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology: 75–129. San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1): 89–117.Google Scholar
Cheng, B.-S., Wang, A.-C., & Huang, M.-P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An ‘insider's’ perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. 2003. The English version of the Chinese personality assessment inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(4): 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinese Cultural Connection. 1987. Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2): 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing? Academy of Management Journal,50(6): 1348–1352.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C. 2001. Tao Te Ching. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Leong, F. T. L., & Leung, K. 2004. Academic careers in Asia: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(2): 346–357.Google Scholar
Lesier, L. 2003. Darwin on morality. NeuroReview. [Cited 8 November 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.neuroreview.com/article4.htmGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. 2007. Asian social psychology: Achievements, threats, and opportunities. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(1): 8–15.Google Scholar
Leung, K., & Brew, F. P. 2009. A cultural analysis of harmony and conflict: Towards an integrated model of conflict styles. In Wyer, R. S. Jr., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (Eds.), Problems and solutions in cross-cultural theory, research and application. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Koch, P., & Lu, L. 2002. A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2): 201–220.Google Scholar
Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. 1999. Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 781–796.Google Scholar
Nam, K. H. 1997. Quotations from Deng Xiaoping. Hong Kong: Sub-culture Ltd.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3): 566–593.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. 1988. Julius Caesar: Act 4, Scene 3, lines 218–224 (Spevack, M., Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1980. Introduction to Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. In Triandis, H. C. & Lambert, W. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 1: 1–14. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1353–1364.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. 1997. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. 2000. Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3): 241–263.Google Scholar
Zhao, S., & Jiang, C. 2009. Learning by doing: Emerging paths of Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 107–119.Google Scholar