Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T18:53:51.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Whom Collectivists Trust: The Role of (in) Voluntary Social Obligations in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Oana Branzei ,
Ronald D. Camp II  and
Ilan Vertinsky
Oana Branzei
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, Canada
Ronald D. Camp II
Affiliation:
University of Regina, Canada
Ilan Vertinsky
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study contributes to an emic understanding of how different types of social obligations may help or hinder the formation of initial organizational trust within collectivist cultures. We extend prior social categorization insights by challenging the expectation that in-group favouritism automatically facilitates higher levels of initial trust among collectivists. We theorize and test the asymmetric effects of two different types of social obligations toward members of distinct social categories (kinship and friendship in-groups) on the formation of initial organizational trust. Using a quasi-experimental research design in a collectivist culture (Japan), we hypothesize and show that in ambivalent situations, voluntary social obligations toward members of friendship in-groups encourage early trust in trustees' organizations; however, involuntary social obligations toward members of kinship in-groups discourage early trust development toward the organization these trustees represent. The effects of (in)voluntary social obligations on initial organizational trust are contingent on how collectivists perceive each encounter: voluntary social obligations are more conducive to trust-building at lower levels of perceived opportunity; involuntary social obligations have stronger effects on initial organizational trust at higher levels of perceived risk.

Keywords

collectivismorganizational trustsocial obligations集体主义组织信任社会义务
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2013 , pp. 319 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bigley, G. A., & Pearce, J. L. 1998. Straining for shared meaning in organizational science: Problems of trust and distrust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 405–421.Google Scholar
Boles, T. L., Le, H., & Nguyen, H.-H. D. 2010. Persons, organizations and societies: The effects of collectivism and individualism on cooperation. In Kramer, R. M., Tenbrunsel, A. E. & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.), Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values and ethical judgements: 171–204. New York; Routledge.Google Scholar
Branzei, O., Vertinsky, I., & Camp, R. D. II. 2007. Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104(1): 61–82.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. 2007. Award for distinguished scientific contributions citation. American Psychologist, 62(8): 726–738.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. 2007. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1): 133–151.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. 1996. Who is this ‘we’,? Levels of collective identity and self-representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1): 83–93.Google Scholar
Cahners Magazine Division of Reed Publishing USA. 2000. Practical experimentation tools. Research and Development, 42: 51–52.Google Scholar
Camp, R. C. II. 2003. Effects of national culture on trust development: A study of Canadian and Japanese business students. Unpublished Dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Huang, S. 2013. Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and future research directions. Management and Organization Reviezv, 9(1): 167–207.Google Scholar
Chen, X.-P., & Li, S. 2005. Cross-national differences in cooperative decision-making in mixed-motive business contexts: The mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 622–636.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Brockner, J., & Katz, T. 1998. Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favouritism: The role of individual versus collective primacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6): 1490–1502.Google Scholar
Child, J.; & Mollering, G. 2003. Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14(1): 69–80.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. 2007. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4): 909–927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, G., & Den Hartog, D. N. 2006. Measuring trust inside organizations. Personnel Review, 35(5): 557–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, G., Gillespie, N., & Chao, G. T. 2010. Unravelling the complexities of trust and culture. In Saunders, M. N. K., Skinner, D., Dietz, G., Gillespie, N. & Lewicki, R.J. (Eds.), Organizational trust: A cultural perspective: 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, R. E., & Worden, R. L. 1992. Japan: A country study (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Doney, P. M., Cannon, P. P., & Mullen, M. R. 1998. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471–488.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. 2008. Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(2-3): 165–190.Google Scholar
Hedayat, A. S., Sloane, N.J. A., & Stufkcn, J. 1999. Orthogonal arrays: Theory and application. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. 2003. Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven nation study. Organization Science, 14(1): 81–90.Google Scholar
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. 2005. Is collectivism a liability? The impact of culture on organizational trust and customer orientation: A seven-nation study. Journal of Business Research, 58(1): 96–102.Google Scholar
Hui, C. H. 1988. Measurement of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(1): 17–36.Google Scholar
Jonas, K., Diehl, M., & Bromer, P. 1997. Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2): 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. 2007. Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2): 234–249.Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 438–458.Google Scholar
Li, P., Bai, Y., & Xi, Y. 2012. The contextual antecedents of organizational trust: A multidimensional cross-level analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(2): 371–396.Google Scholar
Lincoln, J. R., Gerlach, M. L., & Ahmadjian, C. L. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61(1): 67–88.Google Scholar
Luo, J. D. 2005. Particularistic trust and general trust: A network analysis in Chinese Organizations. Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 437–458.Google Scholar
Luo, J. D. 2011. Guanxi revisited: An exploratory study of familiar ties in a Chinese workplace. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kimyama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224–253.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Joumals 38(1): 24–59.Google Scholar
McEvily, B., Perrone, V., Zaheer, A. 2003. Trust as an organizing principle. Organization Science, 14(1): 91–103.Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 473–490.Google Scholar
Möllering, G. 2006. Trust: Reason, routine, reflexivity. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. 1998. Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Otten, S., & Moskowitz, G. B. 2000. Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-based spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1): 77–89.Google Scholar
Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Ryu, S. 2008. Alternative origins to intcrorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organization Science, 19(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G., & Dirks, K. T. 2007. Rebuilding trust and restoring positive relationships: A commitment-based view of trust. In Dutton, J. E. & Ragins, B. R. (Eds.), Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation: 117–136. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. 2008. Radius of trust: Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychologyy 39(4): 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. 1997. The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality 31(1): 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, E., Ulcman, J., & Gleason, M. 2002. Cultural differences in relational collectivism and individualism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA.Google Scholar
Rhee, E., Uleman, J.? & Lee, H. K. 1996. Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5): 1037–1054.Google Scholar
Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1994. Development processes of cooperative intcrorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 90–118.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. 1982. The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In Rossi, P. H. & Nock, S. L. (Eels.), Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach: 33–47. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4): 651–665.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393–404.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. L., Von Glinow, M. A., & Xiao, Z. 2007. Toward polycontextually sensitive research methods. Management and Organization Review, 3(1): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepparcl, B. H., & Sherman, D. M. 1998. The grammars of trust: A model and general implications. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 422–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, B. H., & Tuchinsky, M. 1996. Micro-IB and the network organization. In Kramer, R. M. & Tyler, T. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: 140–165. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3): 506–520.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Trompenaars, F. 1993. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. New York: Irwin.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1353–1364.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J.-L. L. 1997. Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1): 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. 2001. The social identity perspective in intcrgroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In Brown, R. & Gaertner, S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes: 133–152. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. 2003. Trust within organizations. Personnel Review, 32(5): 556–568.Google Scholar
Uleman, J. S., Rhee, E., Bardoliwalla, N., Semin, G., & Toyama, M. 2000. The relational self: Closeness to ingroups depends on who they are, culture, and the type of closeness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. 1997. Methods and analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Harreveld, F., Rutjens, B. T., Rotteveel, M., Nordgrcn, L. F., & van der Pligt, J. 2009. Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1): 167–173.Google Scholar
Voronov, M., & Singer, J. A. 2002. The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(4): 461–480.Google Scholar
Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., & Erdil, S. E. 2011. Antecedents of trust across foci: A comparative study of Turkey and China. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 279–302.Google Scholar
Whitener, E., Brock, S., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. 1998. Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship for understanding managerial trustworthy behaviour. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 513–553.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2001. In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26: 377–396.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. 1999. Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1): 145–161.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. 1994. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2): 129–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuki, M. 2003. Intergroup comparisons versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2): 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuki, M., Maddux, W., Brewer, M. W., & Takeimira, K. 2005. Cross-cultural cliilerences in relationship and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1): 48–62.Google Scholar
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. 1998. Does trust matter? Exploring the efiecls of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2): 141–159.Google Scholar
Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Song, L.J., Li, C., & Jia, L. 2008. How do I trust thee? The employee-organization relationship, supervisory support and middle manager trust in the organization. Human Resource Management, 47(1): 111–132.Google Scholar