Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:52:25.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for Overall Performance Evaluation: Comparing the Role of Task Interdependence in China and the USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Daniel G. Bachrach ,
Hui Wang ,
Elliot Bendoly  and
Shuoyang Zhang
Daniel G. Bachrach
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, USA
Hui Wang
Affiliation:
Peking University, China
Elliot Bendoly
Affiliation:
Emory University, USA
Shuoyang Zhang
Affiliation:
Indiana University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a cross-cultural experiment, we examined how task interdependence influences the importance of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) in employee performance evaluations in China and the USA. A total of 150 graduate students in China and 154 in the USA (a total of 304), who serve as evaluators, participated in the experiment. Participants were exposed to a task interdependence manipulation and then rated the importance of OCB in their overall performance evaluations of employees. Results support the moderating effects of national culture (both using a country proxy and as a measure of collectivism) on the affects of task interdependence. Although among evaluators from the USA perceptions of the importance of OCB increased as task interdependence increased, the effects of task interdependence were significandy attenuated among evaluators from China. Implications of these results for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

collectivismcross-cultural testorganizational citizenship behaviouroverall performance evaluationperformance attributionstask interdependence组织公民行为任务相互依赖性集体主义绩效归因总体绩效评估跨文化研究测量实验研究
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 255 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L., & West, S. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. 1998. The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 247–260.Google Scholar
Bachrach, D. G., Powell, B. C., Bendoly, E., & Richey, R. G. 2006. Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: Exploring the impact of task interdependence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure. Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breer, P. E., & Locke, E. A. 1965. Task experience: A source of attitudes. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis, H. C. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2: methodology: 349–444. Boston, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Meindl, J. R. 1998. How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism. Academy of Management Review, 23: 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9: 233–255.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. L., & Haaland, G. A. 1972. Predecisional information-seeking and subsequent conformity in the social influence process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23: 112–119.Google Scholar
Earley, P. C. 1989. Social loafing and collectivism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 565–581.Google Scholar
Earley, P. C. 1993. East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. 1998. Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24: 265–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C., & Singh, H. 1995. International and intercultural management research: What's next? Academy of Management Journal, 38: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. 1997. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42:421–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., Zhong, C. B., & Organ, D. W. 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science, 15: 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 1984. The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9: 47–53.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 28: 39–50.Google Scholar
Geletanycz, M. A. 1997. The salience of culture's consequences': The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 615–634.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Brandon, G. 1988. Executive values. In Hambrick, D. C. (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers: 3–34. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Hui, C., Lam, S. K., & Law, K. S. 2000. Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 822–828.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W. 1973. Communication in conflict situations: A critical review of the research. International Journal of Group Tensions, 3: 46–67.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1984. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39: 341–350.Google Scholar
Kiggundu, M. N. 1983. Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31: 145–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koys, D.J. 2001. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54: 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, S. S., Hui, C., & Law, K. S. 1999. Organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing perspectives of supervisors and subordinates across four international samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84: 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K., Au, Y. F., Fernandez-Dols, J. M., & Iwawki, S. 1992. Preferences for methods of conflict processing in two collectivistic cultures. International Journal of Psychology, 27: 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. 1993. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of sales performance. Journal of Marketing, 57: 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98: 224–253.Google Scholar
Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. 1995. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 127–142.Google Scholar
Morrison, E. W. 1994. Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employees' perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1543–1567.Google Scholar
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. 1994. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 475–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organ, D. W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington, Books.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. L., & Gregersen, H. B. 1991. Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 838–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 262–270.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1994. Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31: 351–363.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1997. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10: 133–151.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A Critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26: 513–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 3: 435–454.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. E. 1981. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York N.Y.: Harper.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. 1996. National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27: 231–264.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 655–663.Google Scholar
Spilerman, S. 1971. Raising academic motivation in lower class adolescents: A convergence of two research traditions. Sociology of Education, 44: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, E. F., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 1989. Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderating variables: Empirical evidence and related matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74:3–10.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1988. Collectivism v. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept cross-cultural social psychology. In Verma, G. K. & Bagley, C. (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes, and cognition: 60–95. New York N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. 1989. Self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96: 269–289.Google Scholar
Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. 2003. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29: 729–751.Google Scholar
Van Der Vegt, G. S., Van De Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. 2003. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intra-team interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 715–727.Google Scholar
Wageman, R. 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 145–180.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. A. III, & Moch, M. K. 1986. Individualism-collectivism: Concept and measure. Group and Organization Studies, 11: 280–304.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. A. III, VanDyne, L., LePine, J. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 1997. Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on team member performance on solitary and conjunctive tasks. Unpublished paper, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Werner, J. M. 1994. Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role and extra-role behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. L., & Anderson, S. E. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management, 17: 601–617.Google Scholar