Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:43:08.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Board Interlock Tenure and Firm Internationalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2023

Ziyan Zhu
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-sen University, China
Ziliang Deng*
Affiliation:
Renmin University of China, China
*
Corresponding author: Ziliang Deng (ziliang.deng@ruc.edu.cn)

Abstract

To overcome liabilities of foreignness and outsidership during internationalization, board interlock is an effective conduit of foreign knowledge inflows and organizational learning that firms require. We focus on the time dimension of such influence and hypothesize that the tenure of board interlocks with firms with experience in outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) in a country promotes the OFDI decision of the focal firm to that particular country. However, such an effect diminishes as the tenure of interlock ties increases. Moreover, as an alternative knowledge source, OFDI knowledge from the focal firm's neighboring region may weaken the baseline effect. Based on longitudinal data of listed firms in China, our empirical results support the hypotheses. This study enriches the literature on social network learning by identifying its temporal nature and the substitution between different knowledge sources. It also demonstrates the importance of rotating a firm's board members, so that knowledge acquisition and learning remain fresh.

摘要

为了克服企业在国际化过程中遇到的外来者劣势或局外人劣势,企业常常通过建立连锁董事进行组织学习并获取国际知识。本研究关注连锁董事任职时间长短的效应,假设虽然与其他拥有对某一国家的对外直接投资经验企业建立连锁董事会促进本企业对同一国家的对外直接投资决策,但这种影响会随着连锁董事任期的增长而减弱。与此同时,企业拥有的对所在区域的对外直接投资知识可以削弱连锁董事任期对企业国际化决策的影响。本研究采用中国上市公司的面板数据进行了回归分析,结果证实了所提假设。本研究表明,企业在社会网络中学习的时间维度和不同知识来源之间的替代都会影响企业的决策,因此丰富了社会网络学习的相关文献。同时,本研究也阐述了企业董事会成员轮换的重要性,因为只有这样才能获取知识并保持习得知识的新颖性。

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Senior Editor Till Talaulicar

References

REFERENCES

Agresti, A., & Kateri, M. 2011. Categorical data analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Ang, S. H., Benischke, M. H., & Hooi, A. W. L. 2018. Frequency of international expansion through high control market expansion modes and interlocked directorships. Journal of World Business, 53(4): 493503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apaydin, M., Thornberry, J., & Sidani, Y. M. 2020. Informal social networks as intermediaries in foreign markets. Management and Organization Review, 16(3): 629656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basuil, D. A., & Datta, D. K. 2017. Value creation in cross-border acquisitions: The role of outside directors’ human and social capital. Journal of Business Research, 80: 3544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeh, K. K. 2011. Contracting costs and information asymmetry reduction in cross-border M&A. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3): 568590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6): 9911013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma, R. A. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 795817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 639660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. M., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. 2010. Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11): 12261243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Johnson, J. L., Tihanyi, L., & Ellstrand, A. E. 2011. More than adopters: Competing influences in the interlocking directorate. Organization Science, 22(3): 688703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corredoira, R. A., & Rosenkopf, L. 2010. Should auld acquaintance be forgot? The reverse transfer of knowledge through mobility ties. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2): 159181.Google Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2011. Selecting the country in which to start internationalization: The non-sequential internationalization model. Journal of World Business, 46(4): 426437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Maloney, M. M., & Manrakhan, S. 2007. Causes of the difficulties in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5): 709725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Deng, P. 2012. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A critical review and future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4): 408427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, P. 2013. Chinese outward direct investment research: Theoretical integration and recommendations. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 513539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z., Jean, R.-J. B., & Sinkovics, R. R. 2018. Rapid expansion of international new ventures across institutional distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8): 10101032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z., Liesch, P. W., & Wang, Z. 2021. Deceptive signaling on globalized digital platforms: Institutional hypnosis and firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(6): 10961120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Z., Yan, J., & Sun, P. 2020. Political status and tax haven investment of emerging market firms: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(3): 469488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowell, G., & Killaly, B. 2009. Effect of resource variation and firm experience on market entry decisions: Evidence from US telecommunication firms’ international expansion decisions. Organization Science, 20(1): 6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. D. 1997. Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 337360.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsgren, M. 2002. The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11(3): 257277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamba, A., & Triantis, A. J. 2013. Corporate risk management: Integrating liquidity, hedging, and operating policies. Management Science, 60(1): 246264.10.1287/mnsc.2013.1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 10871111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. 2006. Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1): 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GTA Education Tech Ltd. 2019. CSMAR financial and economic databases. Shenzhen: GTA Education Tech Ltd.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. 1999. Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3): 473506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 693706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J., Jo, G. S., & Kang, J. 2018. Is high-quality knowledge always beneficial? Knowledge overlap and innovation performance in technological mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2): 258278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haunschild, P. R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: The impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4): 564592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haveman, H. A. 1993. Follow the leader – mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4): 593627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2005. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 332345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holste, J. S., & Fields, D. 2010. Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1): 128140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S. T. 2018. Joint ventures and technology adoption: A Chinese industrial policy that backfired. Research Policy, 47(8): 14481462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, J. R. L. 2002. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography. Urban Studies, 39(5–6): 871884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S., & Hilary, G. 2018. Zombie board: Board tenure and firm performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(4): 12851329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutzschenreuter, T., Matt, T., & Kleindienst, I. 2020. Going subnational: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 55(4): 101076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm – a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. 2009. The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 14111431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, W. Q., & Talaulicar, T. 2017. Board involvement in the strategic decision making process: A comprehensive review. Annals of Corporate Governance, 2(2): 51169.Google Scholar
Kim, S. H., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Kraut, R. E. 2016. When does repository KMS use lift performance? The role of alternative knowledge sources and task environments. MIS Quarterly, 40(1): 133156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. 2006. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2): 7189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, R., Wu, Z., Bruton, G. D., & Carter, S. M. 2019. The coercive isomorphism ripple effect: An investigation of nonprofit interlocks on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1): 283308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Le, S. A. 2007. The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 11981216.Google Scholar
Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. 2008. Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 363382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, N., & Aggarwal, A. 2005. Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: A quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. Research Policy, 34(4): 441460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. Y. 2009. Do firms in clusters invest in R&D more intensively? Theory and evidence from multi-country data. Research Policy, 38(7): 11591171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Lyles, M. 2015. Knowledge spillovers, search, and creation in China's emerging market. Management and Organization Review, 9(3): 395412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liesch, P. W., Welch, L. S., & Buckley, P. J. 2011. Risk and uncertainty in internationalisation and international entrepreneurship studies. Management International Review, 51(6): 851873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J., Liu, X., Wright, M., & Filatotchev, I. 2014. International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4): 428449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. 2001. The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 565586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Z. M., Zhang, H., Zhong, W. G., & Zhou, K. T. 2020. Top management teams’ academic experience and firms’ corporate social responsibility voluntary disclosure. Management and Organization Review, 16(2): 293333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, K. J., & Argyres, N. S. 2004. Learning to contract: Evidence from the personal computer industry. Organization Science, 15(4): 394410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minbaeva, D., Park, C., Vertinsky, I., & Cho, Y. S. 2018. Disseminative capacity and knowledge acquisition from foreign partners in international joint ventures. Journal of World Business, 53(5): 712724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S. 1996. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1): 271298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina-Morales, F. X., & Martinez-Fernandez, M. T. 2010. Social networks: Effects of social capital on firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2): 258279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najafi-Tavani, Z., Robson, M. J., Zaefarian, G., Andersson, U., & Yu, C. 2018. Building subsidiary local responsiveness: (When) does the directionality of intrafirm knowledge transfers matter? Journal of World Business, 53(4): 475492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, D., Barber, B. M., Zhou, X., & Soysal, Y. 1995. The friendly and predatory acquisition of large U.S. Corporations in the 1960s: The other contested terrain. American Sociological Review, 60(4): 469499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patro, S., Zhang, L. Y., & Zhao, R. 2018. Director tenure and corporate social responsibility: The tradeoff between experience and independence. Journal of Business Research, 93: 5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, S. E. 2014. When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the multinational corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1): 145181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruzzelli, A. M. 2008. Proximity and knowledge gatekeepers: The case of the Polytechnic University of Turin. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(5): 3451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruzzelli, A. M., & Murgia, G. 2021. A multilevel analysis of the technological impact of university-SME joint innovations. Journal of Small Business Management. doi:10.1080/00472778.2021.1874003Google Scholar
Petruzzelli, A. M., Albino, V., & Carbonara, N. 2007. Technology districts: Proximity and knowledge access. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(5): 98114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramasamy, B., Goh, K. W., & Yeung, M. C. H. 2006. Is guanxi (relationship) a bridge to knowledge transfer? Journal of Business Research, 59(1): 130139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravasi, D., & Zattoni, A. 2006. Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8): 16711702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringberg, T., & Reihlen, M. 2008. Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5): 912935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salman, N., & Saives, A. L. 2005. Indirect networks: An intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management, 35(2): 203215.Google Scholar
Shi, J. G., Sadowski, B., Li, S. H., & Nomaler, O. 2020. Joint effects of ownership and competition on the relationship between innovation and productivity: Application of the CDM model to the Chinese manufacturing sector. Management and Organization Review, 16(4): 769789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenfeld, J. A. 2002. What makes great boards great. Harvard Business Review, 80(9): 106113.Google ScholarPubMed
Srinivasan, R., Wuyts, S., & Mallapragada, G. 2018. Corporate board interlocks and new product introductions. Journal of Marketing, 82(1): 132148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, G. K., & Tung, R. L. 2015. Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4): 391414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, P., Deng, Z., & Wright, M. 2021. Partnering with Leviathan: The politics of innovation in foreign-host-state joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(4): 595620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, B., & Vertinsky, I. 1996. Foreign direct investment by Japanese electronics firms in the United States and Canada: Modelling the timing of entry. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4): 655681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuschke, A., Sanders, W. M. G., & Hernandez, E. 2014. Whose experience matters in the boardroom? The effects of experiential and vicarious learning on emerging market entry. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3): 398418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD. 2019. World investment report 2019: Special economic zones. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Useem, M. 1986. The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanneste, B. S., Puranam, P., & Kretschmer, T. 2014. Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12): 18911902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. 2006. Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 819835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. C., & Wu, A. 2016. Geographical FDI knowledge spillover and innovation of indigenous firms in China. International Business Review, 25(4): 895906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y., Zheng, N., Liu, X., & Lu, J. 2014. Expanding to outward foreign direct investment or not? A multi-dimensional analysis of entry mode transformation of Chinese private exporting firms. International Business Review, 23(2): 356370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. G. 2000. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11): 981996.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, J., Ma, X., Tong, T. W., & Li, W. 2018. Network information and cross-border M&A activities. Global Strategy Journal, 8(2): 301323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelner, B. A. 2009. Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12): 13351348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, Y., & Li, H. Y. 2014. FDI spillovers over time in an emerging market: The roles of entry tenure and barriers to imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3): 698722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Li, H. Y., Li, Y., & Zhou, L. A. 2010. FDI spillovers in an emerging market: The role of foreign firms’ country origin diversity and domestic firms’ absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9): 969989.Google Scholar
Zhou, C. H., & Li, J. 2008. Product innovation in emerging market-based international joint ventures: An organizational ecology perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7): 11141132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, L., Wu, W.-P., & Luo, X. 2007. Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 673690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3): 339351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, H., & Adams, M. B. 2008. Corporate ownership, equity risk and returns in the People's Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7): 11491168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar