Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T08:52:57.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behind the Political Connections Under Emerging Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2022

Selenge Ulziisukh Open the ORCID record for Selenge Ulziisukh [Opens in a new window]  and
Zelong Wei
Selenge Ulziisukh*
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
Zelong Wei
Affiliation:
Xi'an Jiaotong University, China
*
Corresponding author: Selenge Ulziisukh (selenge_u@yahoo.co.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In light of inconclusive findings on the effect of political connections, this study explores conditions that affect the effectiveness of political connections on firm performance in democratic systems. First, using a resource dependence rationale, this study stresses the importance of variation in political connections and classifies direct and indirect political connections based on sources of power and the mechanisms for developing connections. Second, this study recognizes that influencing political outcomes is an entire political process in which political power matters. Furthermore, as power is central to the resource dependence rationale unlike exchange in transaction cost economics, this study explores how the effectiveness of political connections is contingent on the dynamics of de jure political power. We find that the effect of direct political connections is susceptible to changes in de jure political power due to its dyadic relationship with de jure power, while indirect political connections are more robust to such changes due to their connections with informal networks holding de facto political power. Further, the positive effects of political connections on firm performance are mediated by operational capability.

摘要

由于目前对政治联系对企业绩效的研究结果莫衷一是，本文试图借助新兴民主体制的独特情境，来探讨不同类型的政治联系对企业绩效的影响及其边界条件。首先，作者基于资源依赖理论分析了权力的最终来源及产生机制，并在此基础上区分了直接政治联系和间接政治联系。本研究发现政治联系对于企业绩效的影响取决于政治权力发挥作用的过程，并发现政治联系的作用随着执政党的更替而动态变化。进一步的，政治联系能通过提高企业的运作能力促进其绩效。然而，在执政党更替的动态环境中，与直接政治联系相比，间接政治联系通过与各个执政党成员建立非正式的关系，对企业绩效的影响更为显著。

Keywords

boundary conditionemerging democraciesinformal networkspolitical connectionresource dependence theory政治联系资源依赖理论非正式网络边界条件新兴民主
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , August 2022 , pp. 686 - 716
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Senior Editor Maral Muratbekova-Touron

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. 2006. De facto political power and institutional persistence. American Economic Review, 96(2): 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. 2013. A political theory of populism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2): 771–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Golosov, M., & Tsyvinski, A. 2011. Power fluctuations and political economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 146: 1009–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Aliyev, H. 2015. Post-soviet informality: Towards theory building. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(3/4): 182–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amore, M. D., & Bennedsen, M. 2013. The value of political connections in a low-corruption environment. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2): 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. 2010. Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31(6): 777–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, M. T., & Viana, R. C. 2014. Political connections: Evidence from listed companies in Portugal. International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 5(1): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonardi, J. P. 2011. Corporate political resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Organization, 9(3): 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. 2005. Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2): 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Huang, S. 2013. Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1): 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R., Courpasson, D., & Philips, N. 2006. Power and organizations. London: Sage publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, K. 2006. Clan politics and regime transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1961. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. 2010. Resource dependence theory: Past and future. In Schoonhoven, C. B. & Dobbin, F. (Eds.), Stanford's organization theory Renaissance 1997–2000, vol. 28: 21–42. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, P., & Yang, M. 2015. Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms: A comparative investigation. International Business Review, 24(1): 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djordjevic, J. 1967. Political power in Yugoslavia. Government and Opposition, 2(2): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, D. 1965. A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1): 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferriani, S., Fonti, F., & Corrado, R. 2012. The social and economic bases of network multiplexity: Exploring the emergence of multiplex ties. Strategic Organization, 11(1): 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S. 1997. Interindustry merger patterns and resource dependence: A replication and extension of Pfeffer (1972). Strategic Management Journal, 18(10): 787–810.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. S. 2001. The inner Asian anomaly: Mongolia's democratization in comparative perspective. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34(3): 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. S. 2006. Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies. Journal of Democracy, 17(1): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisman, R. 2001. Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4): 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, R. J. 1982. In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26(4): 797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Election Commission of Mongolia. 2018. Parliament election results. [Cited 22 December 2018]. Available from URL: http://gec.gov.mn/parliamentary_election/310/41Google Scholar
González, V. M. 2013. Leverage and corporate performance: International evidence. International Review of Economics & Finance, 25: 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigoriev, I. S, & Zhirkov, K. 2020. Do political connections make businesspeople richer? Evidence from Russia, 2003–2010. Research and Politics, 7(4): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, F. 2007. Parties and voters in emerging democracies. In Boix, C. & Stokes, S. C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics: 582–603. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hargrave, M. 2019. Return on equity-ROE. [Cited 22 July 2020]. Available from URL: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/returnonequity.aspGoogle Scholar
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. 2006. Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, A. J. 2005. Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? Journal of Management, 31(3): 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. 2009. Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6): 1404–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Zardkoohi, A., & Bierman, L. 1999. Corporate political strategies and firm performance: Indications of firm-specific benefits from personal service in the US government. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 67–81.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, S. 2014. Antecedents and characteristics of informal relation-based networks in Korea: Yongo, Yonjul, and Inmaek. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1): 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, S., Afiouni, F., Bian, Y., Ledeneva, A., Muratbekova-Touron, M., & Fey, C. F. 2020. Informal networks: Dark sides, bright sides, and unexplored dimensions. Management and Organization Review, 16(3): 511–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibraeva, A., & Nezhina, T. 2013. Public sector reform in Kazakhstan. In Liebert, S., Condrey, S. E., & Goncharov, D. (Eds.), Public administration in post-communist countries: 43–49. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent Authority Against Corruption. 2018. Income and wealth report archive. [Cited 12 November 2018]. Available from URL: http://xacxom.iaac.mn/Google Scholar
Jiang, H., Jia, N., Bai, T., & Bruton, G. D. 2021. Cleaning house before hosting new guests: A political path dependence model of political connection adaptation in the aftermath of anticorruption shocks. Strategic Management Journal, 42(10): 1793–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. 2003. Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2): 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. 2005. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4): 1371–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauth, H. J. 2000. Informal institutions and democracy. Democratization, 7(4): 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, K. 1980. Political parties and linkage: A comparative perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A. 2008. ‘Blat’ and ‘guanxi’: Informal practices in Russia and China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 50(1): 118–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2007. Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2): 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebert, S., Condrey, S. E., & Goncharov, D. 2013. Public administration in post-communist countries: Former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, and Mongolia. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, M. D. 2003. Constituency building as the foundation for corporate political strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1): 112–124.Google Scholar
Minbaeva, D. B., & Muratbekova-Touron, M. 2013. Clanism. Management International Review, 53(1): 109–139.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. 2006. Political control and power of agent. Journal of Law Economics & Organizations, 22(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, T. M., & Caldwell, M. 1994. The institutional foundations of democratic government – a comparison of presidential and parliamentary systems. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 11th International Seminar on the New Institutional Economics, 150(1): 171–195.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. 1973. Politics among nations: The struggle for peace and power. New York: Knoph.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W., Pozner, J. E., & Milner, D. 2020. Varieties of political capital and power in organizations: A review and integrative framework. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1): 303–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C., & Holzinger, I. 2008. The effectiveness of political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Academy of Management Review, 33(2): 496–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. W. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transition. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5): 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 2003. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 879–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shagdar, T. 2015. Homeland associations and the production of informal power in Mongolia. [Cited 25 December 2018]. Available from URL: https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/mongolian-economy/2015/11/05/homeland-associations-and-the-production-of-informal-power-in-mongolia/Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. 1986. Institutional equilibrium and equilibrium institutions. In Weisberg, H. (Ed.), Political science: The science of politics: 51–82. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Shilen nam. 2018. Election campaign contribution archive. [Cited 27 December 2018]. Available from URL: http://shilennam.mn/efundingGoogle Scholar
Shu, E., & Lewin, A. Y. 2017. A resource dependence perspective on low-power actors shaping their regulatory environment: The case of Honda. Organization Studies, 38(8): 1039–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. 2007. Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4): 621–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, D. 2003. Iron cage in an iron fist: Authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 36(1): 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, D. 2010. Political mobilization and the construction of collective identity in Mongolia. Central Asian Survey, 29(3): 251–267.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
Sun, P., Hu, H. W., & Hillman, A. J. 2016. The dark side of board political capital: Enabling blockholder rent appropriation. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5): 1801–1822.Google Scholar
Sun, P., Mellahi, K., & Thun, E. 2010. The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1161–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, P., Mellahi, K., Wright, M., & Xu, H. 2015. Political tie heterogeneity and the impact of adverse shocks on firm value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8): 1036–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TDBM. 2019. Personal interest rate of Trade and Development Bank of Mongolia. [Cited 28 February 2019]. Available from URL: http://tdbm.mn/en/30/cGoogle Scholar
Tihanyi, L., Aguilera, R. V., Heugens, P., Essen, M. V., Sauerwald, S., Duran, P., & Turturea, R. 2019. State ownership and political connections. Journal of Management, 20(10): 1–29.Google Scholar
Tuschke, A., Sanders, W. G., & Hernandez, E. 2014. Whose experience matters in the boardroom? The effects of experiential and vicarious learning on emerging market entry. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3): 398–418.Google Scholar
Ulziisukh, S. 2021. Behind the political connection under emerging democracies (2013–2017). OSF. Available from URL: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XJWRZGoogle Scholar
Vasudeva, G., Zaheer, A., & Hernandez, A. 2013. The embeddedness of networks: Institutions, Structural holes, and innovativeness in the fuel cell industry. Organization Science, 24(3): 645–663.Google Scholar
Wahab, E. A. A., Jamaludin, M. F., Agustia, D., & Harymawan, I. 2020. Director networks, political connections, and earnings quality in Malaysia. Management and Organization Review, 16(3): 687–724.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., Boivie, S., & Ming Chng, D. H. 2006. The strategic impetus for social network ties: Reconstituting broken CEO friendship ties. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5): 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, J., & Li, S. 2012. The divestiture of acquired subunits: A resource dependence approach. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, J., Ma, X., Lu, J. W., & Yiu, D. W. 2014. Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: A resource dependence logic. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9): 1343–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, J. Z., & Chang, S. J. 2018. The contingent effects of political strategies on firm performance: A political network perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8): 2152–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G. Jr., & Chen, Q. 2010. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2): 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar