Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-55wx7 Total loading time: 0.414 Render date: 2021-03-02T15:18:33.714Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Management and Organization Review Management and Organization Review

Article contents

Effectiveness of Chinese Teams: The Role of Conflict Types and Conflict Management Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Dean Tjosvold ,
Kenneth S. Law  and
Haifa Sun
Dean Tjosvold
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Kenneth S. Law
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China
Haifa Sun
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-Seng University, China
Corresponding
E-mail address:
tjosvold@ln.edu.hk
mnlaw@ust.hk
sunhf@scnu.edu.cn
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Findings based on 186 teams involving 689 employees, working in twelve Chinese state-owned factories in three cities, indicated that a cooperative in contrast to a competitive approach was related to perceived team effectiveness, as measured by both team managers and team members. The role of conflict types for team effectiveness, on the other hand, is ambiguous. Furthermore, conflict management approaches affect team perceptions of relational and task conflict. Results suggest that a cooperative conflict management approach may be equally useful for Chinese work teams, as it is for teams in the Western context.

Keywords

冲突管理 团体 合作和竞争 任务与关系冲突
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 2006 , pp. 231 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Alper, S., Tjosvold, D. and Law, S. A. (2000). ‘Conflict management, efficacy, and performance in self-managing work teams’. Personnel Psychology, 53, 625-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amason, A. C. (1996). ‘Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams’. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-48.Google Scholar
Barker, J., Tjosvold, D. and Andrews, R. I. (1988). ‘Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization’. Journal of Management Studies, 25, 2, 167-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. and Bonnett, D. G. (1980). ‘Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structure’. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. and Chou, C. R (1987). ‘Practical issues in structural modeling’. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). ‘Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed’. Journal of Management, 17, 345-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettenhausen, K. L. and Murnighan, J. K. (1991). ‘The development of an intragroup norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural challenges’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J. M., Shapiro, D. L. and Lytle, A. L. (1998). ‘Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiations’. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 410-24.Google Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970). ‘Back-translation for cross-cultural research’. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, W. T. (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, G., Liu, C. H. and Tjosvold, D. (2004). ‘Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China’. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. G. and Ledford, G. E. Jr. (1994). ‘The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment’. Human Relations, 47, 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W, Van Vianen, A. E. M., Harinck, F. and McCusker, C. (1998). ‘Socio-emotional and task-related conflict in groups: Implications for contextual and task performance’. Paper presented at Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference, April 1998.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. and Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. and Weingart, L. R. (2003). ‘Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, M. (1980). ‘Fifty years of conflict’. In Festinger, L. (Ed.), Retrospections on Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, (pp. 46–77).Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. and Bourgeois, L. J. III. (1988). ‘Politics of strategic decision making in high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory’. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 737-70.Google Scholar
George, J. M. and Bettenhausen, K. (1990) ‘Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 6, 698–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbing, D. W. and Anderson, J. C. (1993). ‘Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models’. In Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, California, Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc, (pp. 40–65).Google Scholar
Goodman, P. S., Devadas, R. and Griffith-Hughson, T. L. (1988). ‘Groups and productivity: Analyzing die effectiveness of self-managing teams’. In Campbell, J. P. and Campbell, R. J. (Eds.), Productivity in Organizations: New Perspectives from Industrial and Organizational Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (pp. 295–327).Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that Work (and Those that Don't). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1987). ‘The design of work teams’. In Lorsch, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, (pp. 315-42).Google Scholar
Hanlon, S. C., Meyer, D. C. and Taylor, R. R. (1994). ‘Consequences of gainshairing: A field experiment revisited’. Group and Organizational Management, 19, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1993). ‘Cultural constraints in management theories’. The Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81–94.Google Scholar
Hwang, L. L. (1996). Conflict and Interpersonal Harmony among Chinese People: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Studies: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G. and Wolf, G. (1984). ‘Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1997). ‘A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1995). ‘A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A. and Mannix, E. A. (2001). ‘The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-51.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. and Weldon, E. (1992). A comparative study of managerial attitudes toward conflict in the United States and the People's Republic of China: Issues of theory and measurement’. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV, 1992.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. and Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, P. S., Tang, S. F. Y. and Westwood, R. I. (1991). ‘Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behaviour: Cultural and psychological influences’. Organization Studies, 12, 365-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K. (1997). ‘Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures’. In Earley, P. C. and Erez, M. (Eds.), New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (pp. 640-75).Google Scholar
Leung, K., Koch, P. T. and Lu, L. (2002). A dualistic model of harmony and its implications for conflict management in Asia’. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 201-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. and Weingart, L. R. (2001). ‘Maximizing cross-functional new product team's innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective’. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779-93.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W, Balla, J. R. and McDonald, R. P. (1988). ‘Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size’. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. O. and Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E. and Farr, J. L. (1991). ‘Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 127-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Hofmann, D. A. and Farr, J. L. (1993). ‘Job perception-job satisfaction relations: An empirical comparison of three competing theories’. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 370-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W, Williams, K. Y, Leung, K., Larrick, R., Mendoza, M. T., Bhatnagar, D., Li, J., Kondo, M., Luo, J. L. and Hu, J. C. (1998). ‘Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences’. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 729-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. S. and Nemeth, C. J. (1996). ‘Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (1992). ‘Organizational productivity’. In Dunnette, M. D. and Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, (pp. 443-71).Google Scholar
Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G. and Kim, S. H. (1994). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R. and Rechner, P. L. (1989). ‘Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making’. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-72.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E. (1992). ‘A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions’. In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T. (Eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, (pp. 123-51).Google Scholar
Spector, P. E. and Brannick, M. T. (1995). ‘The nature and effects of method variance in organizational research’. In Cooper, C. L. and Robertson, I. T. (Eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester: Wiley, (pp. 249-74).Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). A face negotiation theory’. In Kim, Y Y and Gudykunst, W. B. (Eds.), Theory and Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage, (pp. 47–92).Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1998). ‘The cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges’. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 285–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1993). Learning to Manage Conflict: Getting People to Work Together Productively. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Hui, C. and Law, K. S. (1998). ‘Empowerment in the manager-employee relationship in Hong Kong: Interdependence and controversy’. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 624-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Poon, M. and Yu, Z. Y (2005). ‘Team effectiveness in China: Cooperative conflict for relationship building’. Human Relations, 58, 341-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1990). ‘Cross cultural studies of individualism and collectivism’. In Berman, J. J. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1989, 37, 41–133.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., McCusker, C. and Hui, C. H. (1990). ‘Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the Waves of Culture. London: Economist Books.Google Scholar
Tse, D. K., Francis, J. and Walls, J. (1994). ‘Cultural differences in conducting intra- and intercultural negotiations: A Sino-Canadian comparison’. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 537-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L. R. and Lewis, C. (1973) ‘The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis’. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tung, R. (1991). ‘Handshakes across the sea: Cross-cultural negotiating for business success’. Organizational Dynamics, 14, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M. and Van de Vliert, E. (2000). ‘Team members’ affective responses to patterns of intragroup interdependence and job complexity’. Journal of Management, 26, 633-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Vliert, E. and Kabanoff, B. (1990). ‘Toward theory-based measures of conflict management’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables’. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 272 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 2nd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

75 Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Effectiveness of Chinese Teams: The Role of Conflict Types and Conflict Management Approaches
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Effectiveness of Chinese Teams: The Role of Conflict Types and Conflict Management Approaches
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Effectiveness of Chinese Teams: The Role of Conflict Types and Conflict Management Approaches
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *