Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T10:03:58.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technical change, task reallocation, and wage inequality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2023

Long Qian Open the ORCID record for Long Qian [Opens in a new window]
Long Qian*
Affiliation:
School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
*
Email: lqian@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper empirically investigates wage inequality within the group of skilled workers in the recent four decades in the USA using CPS data and finds evidence that the trend of wage growth of the top and bottom 10th percentile of skilled workers significantly diverged starting from 2000. Using a task-based framework of occupation, I find that the changing trend of wage inequality was entirely driven by one category of occupation, namely the nonroutine analytic occupation. Then, I consider in a model task reallocation between two broad task categories, namely the routine and abstract task, induced by an ongoing investment-specific technical change. In my model, the labor in the routine task is replaced by cheaper machines due to investment-specific technical change, then workers that are less productive in the abstract task enter abstract occupations. As a result, the wage inequality in the abstract task widens because of the reallocation of less productive workers from the routine task to the abstract task, that is, the “composition effect.” In addition, since economic agents tend to postpone the investment in machines after the ongoing investment-specific technical change takes place for a while, the expansion path of wage inequality is not linear but features an acceleration of wage dispersion in the middle of the technical change. The quantitative results suggest that the model is able to provide a well-matched timing and magnitude of the nonlinear expansion path in wage inequality that is observed in the data.

Keywords

Investment-specific technical changeoccupationstask reallocationwage inequality
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , First View , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In: Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4, pp. 1043–1171. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. (2002) Directed technical change. The Review of Economic Studies 69(4), 781–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Zilibotti, F. (2001) Productivity differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2), 563–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, L. F. K. and Kearney, M. S. (2008) Trends in US wage inequality: Revising the revisionists. The Review of Economics and Statistics 90(2), 300–323.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. (2002) Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica 70(3), 855–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. H. and Violante, G. L. (2002) General purpose technology and wage inequality. Journal of Economic Growth 7(4), 315–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H., Levy, F. and Murnane, R. J. (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4), 1279–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. G. and Violante, G. L. (2002) Investment-specific technical change in the United States (1947-2000): Measurement and macroeconomic consequences. Review of Economic Dynamics 5(2), 243–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, H. and Dorn, D. (2013) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review 103(5), 1553–1597.Google Scholar
Elsby, M. W. L., Hobijn, B. and Şahin, A. (2013) The decline of the US labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2013(2), 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, C. and Katz, L. F. (1998) The origins of technology-skill complementarity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3), 693–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. J. (1990) The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z. and Krusell, P. (1997) Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. The American Economic Review 87(3), 342–362.Google Scholar
Juhn, C., Murphy, K. M. and Pierce, B. (1993) Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy 101(3), 410–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabarbounis, L. and Neiman, B. (2014) The global decline of the labor share. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(1), 61–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. F. (1999) Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In: Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1463–1555. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Katz, L. F. and Murphy, K. M. (1992) Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(1), 35–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krusell, P., Ohanian, L. E., Ríos-Rull, J. and Violante, G. L. (2000) Capital-skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68(5), 1029–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, T. (2006) Increasing residual wage inequality: Composition effects, noisy data, or rising demand for skill? American Economic Review 96(3), 461–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. D. (1951) Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxford Economic Papers 3(2), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattinger, M. (1993) Assignment models of the distribution of earnings. Journal of Economic Literature 31(2), 831–880.Google Scholar
Sattinger, M. (1975) Comparative advantage and the distributions of earnings and abilities. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 43(3), 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1975) Income differences: Recent research.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1974) Substitution of graduate by other labour. Kyklos: International Review for Social Sciences 27(2), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violante, G. L. (2002) Technological acceleration, skill transferability, and the rise in residual inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1), 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vom Lehn, C. (2020) Labor market polarization, the decline of routine work, and technological change: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 110, 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. (2014) Structural transformation, the mismeasurement of productivity growth, and the cost disease of services. American Economic Review 104(11), 3635–3667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar