Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:35:46.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MACROECONOMICS OF SUBSISTENCE POINTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

MORTEN O. RAVN*
Affiliation:
European University Institute and CEPR
STEPHANIE SCHMITT-GROHÉ
Affiliation:
Duke University CEPR and NSER
MARTÍN URIBE
Affiliation:
Duke University and NBER
*
Address correspondence to: Morten O. Ravn, Department of Economics, European University Institute, Villa San Paolo, Via della Pizzola 43, Florence 50133, Italy; e-mail: morten.ravn@eui.eu.

Abstract

This paper explores the macroeconomic consequences of preferences displaying a subsistence point. It departs from the existing related literature by assuming that subsistence points are specific to each variety of goods rather than to the composite consumption good. We show that this simple feature makes the price elasticity of demand for individual goods procyclical. As a result, markups behave countercyclically in equilibrium. This implication is in line with the available empirical evidence.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkeson, Andrew and Ogaki, Masao (1996) Wealth-varying intertemporal elasticities of substitution: Evidence from panel and aggregate data. Journal of Monetary Economics 38, 507534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Andrew and Ogaki, Masao (2001) Rate of time-preference, intertemporal elasticity of substitution, and level of wealth. Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (4), 564572.Google Scholar
Bergin, Paul and Feenstra, Robert (2001) Pricing to market, staggered prices, and real exchange rate persistence. Journal of International Economics 54 (2), 333359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier and Perotti, Roberto (2002) An Empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 13291368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Andrew and Oswald, Andrew (1996) Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics 61, 359381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gali, Jordi, López-Salido, David, and Vallés, Javier (2003) Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Manuscript, CREI, September.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, R. (1950) A note on a constant utility index of the cost of living. Review of Economic Studies 18, 5556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Robert and Rebelo, Sergio (1993) Transitional dynamics and economic growth in the neoclassical model. American Economic Review 83 (4), 908931.Google Scholar
Layard, Richard (2003) Happiness: Has Social Science a Clue? Three Lectures. Mimeo, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Kiminori (2002) The rise of mass consumption societies. Journal of Political Economy 110, 10351070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravn, Morten O., Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie, and Uribe, Martín (2004) The Macroeconomics of Subsistence Points. NBER working paper 11012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravn, Morten O., Schmitt-Grohé, Stephanie, and Uribe, Martín (2006) Deep habits. Review of Economic Studies 73, 195218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotemberg, Julio and Woodford, Michael (1992) Oligopolistic pricing and the effects of aggregate demand on economic activity. Journal of Political Economy 100, 11531207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotemberg, Julio J. and Woodford, Michael (1999) The cyclical behavior of prices and costs, in Taylor, John B. and Woodford, Michael (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Steger, Thomas (2000) Economic growth with subsistence consumption. Journal of Development Economics 62, 343361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, J. (1954) Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: An application to the pattern of british demand, Economic Journal 64, 511527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar