Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

DOES THE CAPITAL INTENSITY MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM THE POSTWAR JAPANESE ECONOMY AND OTHER OECD COUNTRIES

  • Harutaka Takahashi (a1), Koichi Mashiyama (a1) and Tomoya Sakagami (a2)

Abstract

The capital intensity takes an important role in two-sector and multisector growth models. Surprisingly very few empirical studies have been conducted so far except by Kuga (1967). This fact implies that few people have ever tried to perform any empirical research to study whether the two-sector and multisector optimal growth models could explain the economic development properly based on the empirical data. Although we witnessed fairly active theoretical research on two-sector and multisector growth models in the 1990s and recent years, R. M. Solow has thrown doubt on the capital intensities [in Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A (2005, pp. 3–10)]. Our purpose is to measure the capital intensities of the consumption good and the investment good sectors mainly in the postwar Japanese economy, and also in other OECD countries. By so doing, we will demonstrate that the capital intensity does matter and our empirical evidence will strongly support the common assumption that the consumption goods sector is more capital-intensive than the capital goods sector.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence to: Harutaka Takahashi, Department of Economics, Meiji Gakuin University, 1-2-37 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku Tokyo, 108-8636Japan; e-mail: haru@eco.meijigakuin.ac.jp.

References

Hide All
Baumol, William J. (1967) Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review 57, 415426.
Benhabib, Jess and Nishimura, Kazuo (1985) Competitive equilibrium cycles. Journal of Economic Theory 35, 284306.
Benhabib, Jess, Nishimura, Kazuo, and Venditti, Alain (2002) Indeterminacy and cycles in two-sector discrete-time models. Economic Theory 30, 217235.
Bond, Eric, Wang, P., and Yip, C. (1996) A general two-sector model of endogenous growth with human and physical capital: Balanced growth and transition dynamics. Journal of Economic Theory 68, 149173.
Dollar, David and Wolff, E. (1994) Capital-intensity and TFP convergence by industry in manufacturing, 1963–1985. In Baumol, W., Nelson, R., and Wolff, E. (eds.), Convergence of Productivity, pp. 197224. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oded, Galor (1992) A two-sector overlapping-generations model: A global characterization of the dynamical system. Econometrica 69, 13511386.
Simon, Gilchrist and John, C. Williams (2001) Transition Dynamics in Vintage Capital Models: Explaining the Post-war Catch-Up of Germany and Japan. Finance and economics discussion paper 2001/07, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Yutaka, Kosai (1986) The Era of High-Speed Growth. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.
Kuga, Kiyoshi (1967) On the capital-intensity hypothesis. Economic Studies Quarterly 18, 151159.
Leontief, Wassily W. (1954) Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position reexamined. Economia Internazional 7, 532.
Miller, Ronald and Blair, P. (2009) Input–Output Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mino, Kazuo (1992) Analysis of a two-sector model of endogenous growth with capital income taxation. International Economic Review 37, 227251.
Nishimura, Kazuo and Takahashi, Harutaka (1992) Factor intensity and Hopf bifurcation. In Feichtinger, G. (ed.), Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis 4, pp. 135149. North-Holland.
Nishimura, Kazuo and Venditti, Alain (2004) Indeterminacy and the role of factor substitutability. Macroeconomic Dynamics 8, 436465.
Nishimura, Kazuo and Yano, Makoto (1995) Non-linear dynamics and chaos in optimal growth: An example. Econometrica 63, 9981001.
Okuno-Fujiwara, Masahiro and Shell, Karl (2009) MD interview: An interview with Professor Hirofumi Uzawa. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 390420.
Solow, Robert (2005) Reflections on growth theory. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A, pp. 310. North-Holland.
Takahashi, Harutaka (2001) Stable optimal cycles with small discounting in a two-sector discrete-time model: A non-bifurcation approach. Japanese Economic Review 52, 328338.
Takahashi, Harutaka (2009) An unbalanced multi-sector growth model with constant returns: A turnpike approach. Bulletin of Institute for Research in Business and Economics 26, 126.
Uzawa, Hirofumi (1962) On a two-sector model of economic growth. Review of Economic Studies 14, 4047.
Uzawa, Hirofumi (1963) On a two-sector model of economic growth II. Review of Economic Studies 19, 105118.
Uzawa, Hirofumi (1964) Optimal growth in a two-sector model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 31, 124.
Wolff, Edward N. (2004) What has happened to the Leontief paradox? In Dietzenbacher, E. and Lahr, M. (eds.), Wassily Leontief and Input–Output Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Keywords

DOES THE CAPITAL INTENSITY MATTER? EVIDENCE FROM THE POSTWAR JAPANESE ECONOMY AND OTHER OECD COUNTRIES

  • Harutaka Takahashi (a1), Koichi Mashiyama (a1) and Tomoya Sakagami (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed