Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T19:41:21.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do business cycles result from stochastic shocks?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2023

Yi Zhu*
Affiliation:
Department of mathematics, The State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA

Abstract

According to the real business cycle theory, business cycles mainly result from random exogenous shocks. In this paper, this argument is tested. I extend the Wald–Wolfowitz runs test under the assumption that a recession lasts for two periods at least and an expansion lasts for $k$ periods at least with k ≥ 2. I apply the extended runs test to the three two-valued data recession-expansion series generated by the National Bureau of Economic Research and the Center for Economic and Policy Research. The test results reject the null hypothesis that they are generated in a random way for any $k$ even at the 1% significance level.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Elliott, G. R., Rothenberg, T. J. and Stock, J. H.. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4), 813836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. C.. (1982) Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 50(6), 13451370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. R. and Plosser, C. I.. (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 10(2), 139162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P.. (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2), 335346. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, A. and Wolfowitz, J.. (1940) On a test whether two samples are from the same population. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11(2), 147162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar