Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Law & Social Inquiry
  4. Volume 17
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Volume 17 - Summer 1992

Contents

Page 2 of 3

Comments and Debate

  • Legalism and English Administrative Law: Comment on Sterett

  • David Feldman, Mark Gould
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. 89-100

  • In a recent issue of this journal (Volume 15, Number 4, Fall 1990), Susan Sterett examined the role of the Law Commission in the development of English administrative law. She suggested that the Commission mimicked a “peak association” and adopted an “idiom of legalism” in order to justify its reform proposals. This comment disagrees with Sterett on three grounds. First, the role and constitutional position of the Commission is far more complex than Sterett suggests, and this affects the way in which the Commission works. Second, judges and academic lawyers were central to the reform of substantive principles of judicial review in the 1960s and 1970s, making it unnecessary for the Law Commission to act in this field. Finally, it is wrong to ignore the fact that much administrative law occurs outside the judicial review procedure.

Review Essay

The Intrigues of Rights, Resistance, and Accommodation

Review Commentary

Do Lawyers Impair Economic Growth?

Commentary

Review Essay

Comments and Debate

Review Essay

Commentary

Review Essay

Do Lawyers Impair Economic Growth?

Rejoinder

Comments and Debate

The Supreme Court and Social Change

Review Section Symposium

Book Notes

Review Essay

Comments and Debate

The Supreme Court and Social Change

Review Section Symposium

Book Notes

Front matter

  • LSI volume 17 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2018, pp. f1-f5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Review Essay

Page 2 of 3