Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T23:27:18.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moving beyond the Policy of No Policy: Emigration from Mexico and Central America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

Do Caribbean Basin states influence U.S. immigration policy? Although the terrorist attacks of September 2001 eventually derailed migration talks, before that time Mexico and the United States appeared poised to negotiate a major bilateral agreement, largely on Mexico's terms. Drawing on 88 detailed interviews conducted with Mexican and other Caribbean Basin elites, this article examines sending-state preferences for emigration and their capacity to influence policy outcomes. The informants considered migration to be the most problematic issue on the bilateral agenda, but also saw migration policy as relatively open to source-state influence. A case study of Mexican emigration policymaking details the national and transnational changes that make migration increasingly an inter-mestic policy issue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreas, Peter. 1998. The U.S. Immigration Control Offensive: Constructing an Image of Order on the Southwest Border. In Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. Marcelo, Suarez-Orozco. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 343–61.Google Scholar
Asch, Beth J., and Courtland, Reichmann. 1994. Emigration and Its Effects on the Sending Country. Document no. MR-244-FF. Los Angeles: RAND Corp.Google Scholar
Bach, Robert. 1990. Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. in Tucker et al. 1990. 123–49.Google Scholar
Bach, Robert. 1992. Hemispheric Migration in the 1990s. In The United States and Latin America in the 1990s: Beyond the Cold War, ed. Jonathan Hartlyn, Lars Schoultz, and Augusto, Varas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 262–81.Google Scholar
Binational Study on Migration Between Mexico and the United States. 1997. Mexico City: Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Barry, Susan, Collins, and Nora, Lustig, eds. 1997. Coming Together? Mexico-United States Relations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, Victor, and James, Dunkerley. 1999. The United States and Latin America: The New Agenda. London/Cambridge: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of London/Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 1994. U.S. Immigration and Policy Responses: the Limits of Legislation. in Cornelius et al. 1994. 55–82.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen, and Mark, Miller. 1998. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Castro, Max J. 1999a. Toward New Nativism? the Immigration Debate in the United States and Its Implications for Latin America and the Caribbean. in Castro 1999b. 33–52.Google Scholar
Castro, Max J., ed. 1999b. Free Markets, Open Societies, Closed Borders? Trends in International Migration and Immigration Policy in the Americas. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press.Google Scholar
Chabat, Jorge. 1989. The Making of Mexican Policy Toward the United States. In Foreign Policy in U. S.-Mexican Relations, ed. Rosario, Green and Peter, H. Smith. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. 87124.Google Scholar
Chabat, Jorge. 1989. 1996. Mexican Foreign Policy in the 1990s: Learning to Live with Interdependence. In Latin American Nations in World Politics, 2nd ed., ed. Her-aldo, Muñoz and Joseph, Tulchin. Boulder: Westview Press. 149–63.Google Scholar
Chabat, Jorge. 1997. Mexico's Foreign Policy after Nafta: the Tools of Interdependence. in de la Garza and Velasco 1997. 33–47.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, Paula. 2001. The Emigration of High-Skilled Indian Workers to the United States: Flexible Citizenship and India's Information Economy. in Cornelius et al. 2001. 325–49.Google Scholar
Cody, Edward. 1986. Mexican Governor Gets U.S. Apology. Washington Post, May 29: A17.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1992. From Sojourners to Settlers: The Changing Profile of Mexican Migration to the United States. In U. S.-Mexico Relations: Labor Market Interdependence, ed. Jorge, A. Bustamante, Clark, W. Reynolds, and Raul, A. Hinojosa Ojeda. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 155–95.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 1998. The Structural Embeddedness of Demand for Mexican Immigrant Labor: New Evidence from California. In Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. Marcelo, Suárez-Orozco. Cambridge: Harvard University Center for Latin American Studies. 114–44.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 2001. Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of U.S. Immigration Control Policy. Population and Development Review 27, 4: 664–85.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. 2003. An Immoral Policy on Illegal Entry. Los Angeles times, June 8: M5.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Philip, L. Martin, and James, F. Hollifield, eds. 1994. Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Thomas, Espenshade, and Idean, Salehyan, eds. 2001. The International Migration of the Highly Skilled: Demand, Supply, and the Development Consequences in Sending and Receiving Countries. La Jolla: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Craig, Richard B. 1971. The Bracero Program: Interest Groups and Foreign Policy. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
De la Garza, Rodolfo O. 1997. Foreign Policy Comes Home: the Domestic Consequences of the Program for Mexican Communities Living in Foreign Countries. in de la Garza and Velasco 1997. 6988.Google Scholar
De la Garza, Rodolfo O., and Jesús, Velasco, eds. 1997. Bridging the Border: Transforming Mexico-U.S. Relations. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
DeSipio, Louis. 1996. Counting on the Latino Vote: Latinos as a New Electorate. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Díaz Briquets, Sergio. 1995. The Relationship Between U.S. Foreign Policies and U.S. Immigration Policies. In Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders: World Migration and U.S. Policy, ed. Michael, S. Teitelbaum and Myron Weiner. New York: W. W. Norton. 160–89.Google Scholar
Díaz Briquets, Sergio, and Jorge, Pérez-López. 1997. Refugee Remittances: Conceptual Issues and the Cuban and Nicaraguan Experiences. International Migration Review 31, 2: 411–37.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1990. Immigration as Foreign Policy in U.S.-Latin American Relations. in Tucker et al. 1990. 150–67.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1992. Cooperating with the Enemy? U.S. Immigration Policies toward Cuba. in Mitchell 1992c. 31–88.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and de Castro, Rafael Fernández 2001. The United States and Mexico: Between Partnership and Conflict. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunn, Timothy. 1996. The Militarization of the U.S.-Mexico Border, 1978–1992. Austin: CMAS Books, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Todd A. 1997. The Rise of the Mexican Lobby in Washington: Even Further from God, and Even Closer to the United States. in de la Garza and Velasco 1997. 89124.Google Scholar
Fineman, Mark. 1994. Mexico Fights Prop. 187—Delicately. Los Angeles times, October 29: A13.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert, and James, Jones, eds. 1999. The United States and the Americas: A Twenty-First Century View. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary. 1995. Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States. International Migration Review 29, 4: 881–902.Google Scholar
Freeman, Gary. 1998. Politics and Immigration Restriction in Liberal States. In Challenge to the Nation-State: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States, ed. Christian, Joppke. New York: Oxford University Press. 86108.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Lawrence H. 1990. The American Kaleidoscope: Race, Ethnicity, and the Civic Culture. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
García y Griego, Manuel. 1988. The Bracero Policy Experiment: U.S.-Mexican Responses to Mexican Labor Migration, 1942–1965. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
García y Griego, Manuel. 1992. Policymaking at the Apex: International Migration, State Autonomy, and Societal Constraints. In U. S.-Mexico Relations: Labor Market Interdependence, ed. Jorge, Bustamante, Clark, Reynolds, and Raúl, Hinojosa-Ojeda. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 75110.Google Scholar
Gimpel, James G., and James, R. Edwards Jr. 1999. The Congressional Politics of Immigration Reform. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
González Gutiérrez, Carlos. 1997. Decentralized Democracy: the Role of Consular Offices in Mexico's Relations with Its Diaspora. in de la Garza and Velasco 1997. 4967.Google Scholar
González Gutiérrez, Carlos. 2001. Fostering Identities: Mexico's Relations with Its Diaspora. Journal of American History 86, 2: 545–68.Google Scholar
Grayson, George. 1998. Lobbying by Mexico and Canada. in Pastor and Fernández de Castro 1998. 70–94.Google Scholar
Hanson, Gordon H., and Antonio, Spilimbergo. 1999. Illegal Immigration, Border Enforcement, and Relative Wages: Evidence from Apprehensions at the U.S. Mexico Border. American Economic Review 89, 5 (December): 1337–57.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan, Lars, Schoultz, and Augusto, Varas. 1992. The United States and Latin America in the 1990s: Beyond the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Haus, Leah. 1999. Integrated Issues: Migration and International Economic Interdependence. in Castro 1999b. 85–99.Google Scholar
Haus, Leah. 2002. Unions, Immigration, and Internationalization: New Challenges and Changing Coalitions in the U.S. and France. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Marilyn. 1991. New Immigrants and Democratic Society: Minority Integration in Western Democracies. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary, and Jeffrey, Schott. 1992. North American Free Trade: Issues and Recommendations. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Iqbal, Mahmood. 2001. The Migration of High-Skilled Workers from Canada to the United States: the Economic Basis of the Brain Drain. in Cornelius et al. 2001. 291–323.Google Scholar
Jonas, Susanne. 1999. “National Security,” Regional Development, and Citizenship in U.S. Immigration Policy: Reflections from the Case of Central American Immigrants and Refugees. in Castro 1999b. 175–95.Google Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1998. Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration. World Politics 50 (January): 266–93.Google Scholar
Kessler, Alan. n. d. Assessing Emigration: New Estimates of the Size and Skill Composition of Ldc Migration. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Leiden, Warren. 1995. The Role of Interest Groups in Policy Formation. Washington Law Review 70: 715–24.Google Scholar
Loescher, Gil, and John, A Scanlan. 1986. Calculated Kindness: Refugees and America's Half-Open Door, 1945 to the Present. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lowell, Lindsay B., and de la Garza, Rodolfo O. 2000. The Developmental Role of Remittances in U.S. Latino Communities and in Latin American Countries. Final Project Report of the Inter-American Dialogue and Tomas Rivera Policy Institute, <http://www.thedialogue.org>..>Google Scholar
Lowenthal, Abraham. 1999. U.S.-Latin American Relations at the Century's End: Managing the “Intermestic” Agenda. in Fishlow and Jones 1999. 109–36.Google Scholar
Mahler, Sarah. J. 1999. Vested in Migration: Salvadorans Challenge Restrictionist Policies. in Castro 1999b. 157–74.Google Scholar
Manning, Bayless. 1977. The Congress, the Executive, and Intermestic Affairs: Three Proposals. Foreign Affairs 55 (January): 306–24.Google Scholar
Markusen, James R. 1988. Production, Trade, and Migration with Differentiated, Skilled Workers. Canadian Journal of Economics 21, 3: 492–506.Google Scholar
Martin, Philip L. 1994. Good Intentions Gone Awry: Irca and U.S. Agriculture. Annals, AAPSS 534 (July): 4457.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas, Joaquin, Arango, Graeme, Hugo, Ali, Kouaouci, Adela, Pelle-grino, and Edward Taylor, J.. 1998. Worlds in Motion: International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonnell, Patrick J. 1994. Mexican Official Denounces Ballot Measure. Los Angeles times, August 15: A3.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Christopher. 1992a. Introduction: Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy toward the Caribbean, Central America, and Mexico. in Mitchell 1992c. 1–30.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Christopher. 1992b. U.S. Foreign Policy and Dominican Migration to the United States. in Mitchell 1992c. 89–123.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Christopher. 1994. International Migration as an Issue on Today's Inter-American Agenda. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 36, 3 (Fall): 93–110.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Christopher, ed. 1992c. Western Hemisphere Immigration and United States Foreign Policy. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Moehring, H. B. 1988. Symbol versus Substance in Legislative Activity: the Case of Illegal Immigration. Public Choice 57 (June): 287–94.Google Scholar
Newland, Kathleen. 1995. The Impact of U.S. Refugee Policies on U.S. Foreign Policy: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog? In Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders. World Migration and U.S. Policy, ed. Michael, Teitelbaum and Myron, Weiner. New York: W. W. Norton. 190214.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin, and Jeffrey, Williamson. 1999. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Partido Acción Nacional (PAN). 2004. Programa de acción política. <http://www.pan.org.mxdocsPAP.pdf> (Accessed July 22, 2004).+(Accessed+July+22,+2004).>Google Scholar
Partido de la Republica Democrática (PRD. 2001. Programa. <http://www.prd.org.mxdownloadsprograma.pdf> (Accessed July 22, 2004).+(Accessed+July+22,+2004).>Google Scholar
Partido Revolucionario Institutional (PRI). 2000. Plataforma electoral federal 2000–2006. <http://www.pri.org.mxprincipalPRI.htm> (Accessed July 22, 2004).+(Accessed+July+22,+2004).>Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert. 2001. Exiting the Whirlpool: U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Latin America and the Caribbean. 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pastor, Robert, and de Castro, Rafael Fernandez, eds. 1998. The Controversial Pivot: The U.S. Congress and North America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Poitras, Guy. 2001. Inventing North America: Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. Divergent Destinies: Immigration, the Second Generation, and the Rise of Transnational Communities. In Paths to Inclusion: The Integration of Migrants in the United States and Germany, ed. Peter, Schuck and Rainer, Münz. New York: Bergahn Books. 3358.Google Scholar
Rico F., Carlos. 1992. Migration and U.S.-Mexican Relations, 1966–1986. in Mitchell 1992c. 3–25.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R. 1998. My Neighbor, Myself: Mexican Influence on U.S. Migration Policy. Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 3, 2: 527–56.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R. 2000. Abroad and at Home: the Foreign and Domestic Sources of U.S. Migration Policy. Ph.D. diss., University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R. 2001. Conclusion: High-Skilled Immigration and the U.S. National Interest. in Cornelius et al. 2001. 373–400.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R. 2002. Congress, the President, and the Ins: Who's in Charge of U.S. Immigration Policy? Paper presented at the 98th annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, August 29-September 1.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R. 2003. The Intermestic Politics of Immigration Policy: Lessons from the Bracero Program. Political Power and Social Theory 17: 139–82.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R. 2004. The Transnational Politics of U.S. Immigration Policy. Monograph no. 3. La Jolla: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Marc R., and Idean, Salehyan. 2004. Norms and Interests in U.S. Asylum Enforcement. Journal of Peace Research 41, 6.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Christopher. 2003. Security and the Political Economy of International Migration. American Political Science Review 97, 4: 603–20.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1999. Transnational Economics and National Migration Policies. in Castro 1999b. 7–32.Google Scholar
Schoultz, Lars. 1992. Central America and the Politicization of U.S. Immigration Policy. in Mitchell 1992c. 157–219.Google Scholar
Schoultz, Lars. 1998. Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy Toward Latin America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Rita J., and James, P. Lynch. 1999. A Comparative Assessment of Public Opinion toward Immigrants and Immigration Policies. International Migration Review 33, 2: 455–86.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 1999. Trouble Ahead? Prospects for U.S. Relations with Latin America. in Fishlow and Jones 1999. 174–96.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter H. 2000. Talons of the Eagle: Dynamics of U.S.-Latin American Relations, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stepick, Alex. 1982. Haitian Boat People: a Study in the Conflicting Forces Shaping U.S. Refugee Policy. Law and Contemporary Problems [Duke University Law Journal] 45, 2: 163–96.Google Scholar
Stepick, Alex. 1992. Unintended Consequences: Rejecting Haitian Boat People and Destabilizing Duvalier. in Mitchell 1992c. 125–55.Google Scholar
Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo M. 1999. Latin American Immigration to the United States. in Bulmer-Thomas and Dunkerley 1999. 227–44.Google Scholar
Suttmeier, Richard, and Cong, Cao. 2001. China's New Scientific Elite: Distinguished Young Scientists, the Research Environment and Hopes for Chinese Science. China Quarterly 168: 960–85.Google Scholar
Teitelbaum, Michael S. 1984. Immigration, Refugees, and Foreign Policy. International Organization 38, 3: 429–50.Google Scholar
Thorup, Cathryn. 1989. U.S. Policy Toward Mexico: Prospects for Administrative Reform. In Foreign Policy in U.S.-Mexican Relations, ed. Rosario, Green and Peter, H. Smith. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego. 129–57.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W. 1990. Immigration and Foreign Policy: General Considerations. in Tucker et al. 1990. 1–14.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W., Charles, B. Keely, and Linda, Wrigley, eds. 1990. Immigration and U.S. Foreign Policy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Tuirán, Rodolfo. 2000. Migración México-Estados Unidos: opciones de politica. Mexico City: CONAPO.Google Scholar
Urrutía, Alonso. 2000. Remesas de migrantes equivalen a 83% de la inversión de Eu en México. La Jornada (Mexico City), October 30: Al.Google Scholar
Vega, Bernardo, and Roberto, Despradel. 1999. Migration Trends by Dominicans and Other Caribbean Nationals to the United States. Report. New York: Embassy of the Dominican Republic.Google Scholar
Vernez, Georges, 1989. Overview. In Immigration and International Relations: Proceedings of a Conference on the International Effects of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), ed. Vernez, . Washington, DC: Urban Institute. 114.Google Scholar
Watts, Julie. 2000. An Unconventional Brotherhood: Union Support for Liberalized Immigration in Europe. CCIS Monograph 1. La Jolla: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Weeks, John, ed. 1991. Beyond Superpower Rivalry: Latin America and the Third World. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 19923. Security, Stability, and International Migration. International Security 17, 3: 91–126.Google Scholar
Weiner, Myron. 1993. Introduction: Security, Stability, and International Migration. In International Migration and Security, ed. Weiner, . Boulder: Westview Press. 135.Google Scholar
World, Bank. 2001. World Development Indicators. CD-ROM. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide. 1990. The Roots of U.S. Refugee Policy. in Tucker et al. 1990. 92121.Google Scholar