Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:37:22.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Malapportionment and Ideological Bias in Chilean Electoral Districts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

John M. Carey
John M. Carey*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College. John.M.Carey@dartmouth.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2015, Chile fundamentally reformed the electoral system it had used since 1989. The old system was characterized by high levels of malapportionment, or differences across districts in the ratios of voters to representatives. In the first elections after redemocratization, malapportionment favored the ideological right, but elections since 2000 have yielded no evidence that malapportionment produced ideological bias. The new, postreform electoral system reduces malapportionment in the lower chamber, although it remains pronounced in both chambers. Nevertheless, analysis of results from previous elections, coupled with information about the new districts, suggests that, consistent with recent experience, malapportionment will not produce ideological bias in elections to either chamber.

Type
Research Note
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , Fall 2016 , pp. 123 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auth Stewart, Pepe. 2014. La hora del cambio del sistema binominal. In Electoras y electors, movimientos, partidos, ed. Flisfisch, Ángel F. Santiago: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2011. Latin America's Left Mandate: Free-Market Policies and Issue Voting in New Democracies. World Politics 63, 1: 43–77.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2006. Las virtudes del sistema binominal. Revista de Ciencia Política 26, 1: 226–35.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., and Siavelis, Peter M.. 2005. Insurance for Good Losers and the Survival of Chile's Concertación. Latin American Politics and Society 47, 2 (Summer): 1–22.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 1999. Partidos y coaliciones en Chile de los 90: entre pactos y proyectos. In El modelo chileno: democracia y desarrollo en los noventa, ed. Drake, Paul and Jaksic, Ivan. Santiago: LOM.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Ricardo, and Morales, Mauricio. Forthcoming. Chile's 2015 Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of the Game. Latin American Politics and Society.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2005. La transformación de votos en escaños: leyes electorales en Chile, 1833–2004. Política y Gobierno 12, 2: 233–76.Google Scholar
Observatorio Político Electoral. 2015. Mapa de distritos y circunscripciones 2015. Excel dataset, provided by Prof. Patricio Navia, May 6, 2015. Santiago: Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Polga-Hecimovich, John, and Siavelis, Peter M.. 2015. Here's the Bias! a (Re-) Reassessment of the Chilean Electoral System. Electoral Studies 40: 268–79.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1967. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rojas, Priscilla, and Navia, Patricio. 2005. Representación y tamaño de los distritos electorales en Chile, 1988–2002. Revista de Ciencia Política 25, 2: 91–116.Google Scholar
Samuels, David, and Snyder, Richard. 2001. The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 31: 651–71.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy R. 1995. Reconstituting Party Politics in Chile. In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, Scott P. and Scully, Timothy R.. New York: Cambridge University Press. 100–137.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy R., and Samuel Valenzuela, J.. 1997. Electoral Choices and the Party System in Chile: Continuities and Changes at the Recovery of Democracy. Comparative Politics 29, 4: 511–27.Google Scholar
Senado de la República de Chile. 2015. Senadores por regiones. http://www.senado.cl/appsenado/templates/senadores/regiones.html Google Scholar
Servicio Electoral de Chile. 2015a. Elecciones presidenciales 1989 al 2013 por circunscripción electoral. http://www.servel.cl/ss/site/resultadoselectorales.html Google Scholar
Servicio Electoral de Chile. 2015b. Resultados en Excel por Mesa (a partir del año 2012). http://www.servel.cl/ss/site/resultadoselectorales.html Google Scholar
Servicio Electoral de Chile. 2015c. Elecciones Municipales 1992 al 2012 por Circunscripción Electoral. http://www.servel.cl/ss/site/resultadoselectorales.html Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M. 1997. Continuity and Change in the Chilean Party System: on the Transformational Effects of Electoral Reform. Comparative Political Studies 30, 6: 651–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M. 2000. The President and Congress in Post-Authoritarian Chile: Insitutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Zapata Larraín, Patricio. 2014. El sistema binominal y sus efectos sobre la democracia representativa. In Electoras y electors, movimientos, partidos, ed. Flisfisch, Angel F. Santiago: FLACSO. 165–72.Google Scholar
Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2007. Where's the Bias? a Reassessment of the Chilean Electoral System. Electoral Studies 26, 2: 303–14.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Carey supplementary material

Appendix

Download Carey supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 4.6 MB