Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:57:35.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Informal Sector Work and Evaluations of the Incumbent: The Electoral Effect of Vulnerability on Economic Voting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Matthew M. Singer*
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut. matthew.m.singer@uconn.edu

Abstract

Economically vulnerable voters are expected to hold politicians accountable for their management of the economy because these voters are more likely to be personally affected by economic shocks and less able to cope with the resulting dislocation. Evidence from the informal sector in Argentina, where the lack of formal registration increases income volatility and denies unemployment benefits, is consistent with this hypothesis. Data from Argentina from 2005 to 2006 show that the association between evaluations of the economy and evaluations of President Néstor Kirchner was stronger among those working without formal employment guarantees. The implication is that the electoral support of Latin America's many informal workers may very well be fickle and dependent on economic performance.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, Pablo, and Montes-Rojas, Gabriel. 2014. Informal Jobs and Trade Liberalisation in Argentina. Journal of Development Studies 50, 8: 1104–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, Omar, and Escudero, Walter Sosa. 2007. Assessing Trends in Informality in Argentina: a Cohorts Panel Var Approach. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Barbieto, Alberto, and Lo Vuolo, Rubén. 2003. Income (in)security in Argentina. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Bargain, Olivier, and Kwenda, Prudence. 2011. Earnings Structures, Informal Employment, and Self-employment: New Evidence from Brazil, Mexico, and South Africa. Review of Income and Wealth 57, S1: 100122.Google Scholar
Bertranou, Fabio, and Casanova, Luis. 2014. Informalidad laboral en Argentina: segmentos críticos y políticas para la formalización. Buenos Aires: ILO.Google Scholar
Bertranou, Fabio, and Maurizio, Roxana. 2011. Trabajadores independientes, mercado laboral e informalidad en Argentina. Buenos Aires: ILO.Google Scholar
Bertranou, Fabio, Casanova, Luis, Jiménez, Maribel, Jiménez, Mónica. 2013. Informality and Employment Quality in Argentina: Country Case Study on Labor Market Segmentation. Buenos Aires: ILO. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2350292 Google Scholar
Bizer, George, and Krosnick, Jon. 2001. Exploring the Structure of Strength-related Attitude Features: the Relation between Attitude Importance and Attitude Accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, 4: 566–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosch, Mariano, and Maloney, William. 2007. Comparative Analysis of Labor Market Dynamics Using Markov Processes: an Application to Informality. IZA Discussion Paper no. 3038. Bonn: IZA. http://www.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=3038 Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell. 1991. Political Parties and the Worker-Employer Cleavage: the Impact of the Informal Sector on Voting in Lima, Peru. Bulletin of Latin American Research 10, 3: 293313.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Sudharshan, and Sethuraman, S. V.. 2001. Social Protection and the Informal Sector in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0130. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan, Love, Gregory, and Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia. 2015. Cushioning the Fall: Scandals, Economic Conditions, and Executive Approval. Political Behavior 37, 1: 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Sukti. 2003. Growth, Informality, and Insecurity. Seminar no. 531 (November). www.india-seminar.com/2003/531/531%20sukti%20dasgupta.htm.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles, Aguilar, Edwin, and Speer, John. 1999. Associations and Activism: Mobilization of Urban Informal Workers in Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 41, 1: 3566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Soto, Hernando. 1989. The Other Path: The Invisible Revolution in the Third World. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dorussen, Han, and Taylor, Michaell. 2002. Group Economic Voting: a Comparison of the Netherlands and Germany. In Economic Voting, ed. Dorussen, and Taylor, . New York: Routledge. 92120.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond, and Sagarzazu, Iñaki. 2014. Crisis Perceptions and Economic Voting among the Rich and the Poor: the United Kingdom and Germany. In Mass Politics in Tough Times: Opinions, Votes, and Protest in the Great Recession, ed. Bartels, Larry and Bermeo, Nancy. New York: Oxford University Press. 224–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, Raymond, and Stevenson, Randy. 2008. Voting in Context: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition the Economic Vote. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Echegaray, Fabian. 2005. Economic Crises and Electoral Responses in Latin America. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 2003. The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori. Journal of Latin American Studies 35, 1: 139–62.Google Scholar
Esquival, Valeria. 2010. The Informal Economy in Greater Buenos Aires: a Statistical Profile. Urban Policies Research Report 9. December. Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing. http://wiego.org Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1982. Economic Self-Interest and Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 26 (August): 446–66.Google Scholar
Fernández-Kelly, Patricia, and Sheffner, Jon. 2006. Out of the Shadows: The Informal Economy and Political Movements in Latin America. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Fossati, Diego. 2014. Economic Vulnerability and Economic Voting in 14 Oecd Countries. European Journal of Political Research 53, 1: 116–35.Google Scholar
Freije, Samuel. 2004. Informal Employment in Latin America and the Caribbean: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Recommendations. IDB Policy Briefs. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Gélineau, François, and Singer, Matthew. 2015. The Economy and Incumbent Support in Latin America. In The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts, ed. Carlin, Ryan E., Singer, , and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 281–99.Google Scholar
Gunter, Isabel, and Launov, Andrey. 2012. Informal Employment in Developing Countries: Opportunity or Last Resort? Journal of Development Economics 97, 1: 8898.Google Scholar
Halpin, Brian W. 2015. Subject to Change without Notice: Mock Schedules and Flexible Employment in the United States. Social Problems 62, 3: 419–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv008 Google Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy. 2001. Interdependence, Government Constraints, and Economic Voting. Journal of Politics 63, 4 (November): 1141–62.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas, Rivers, R. Douglas, and Vasilatos, Nicholas. 1982. The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational and Partisan Groups. American Journal of Political Science 26 (May): 312–32.Google Scholar
Hussmanns, Ralf. 2004. Measuring the Informal Economy: from Employment in the Informal Sector to Informal Employment. Working Paper 53. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2004. Economic Security for a Better World. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). 2013. Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Kalleberg, Arne. 2009. Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition. American Sociological Review 74, 1: 122.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy. 2009. Gender and Economic Voting, Revisited. Electoral Studies 28 (December): 615–24.Google Scholar
Kenney, Charles. 2004. Fujimori's Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, and Rietberg, Ewald. 1995. Parties, Media, the Public and the Economy: Patterns of Societal Agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research 28, 1: 95118.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon. 1988. The Role of Attitude Importance in Social Evaluations: a Study of Political Preferences, Presidential Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55, 2: 196210.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael, Nadeau, Richard, and Elias, Angelo. 2008. Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data. American Journal of Political Science 52, 1: 8495.Google Scholar
Loayza, Norman, and Rigolini, Jamele. 2011. Informal Employment: Safety Net or Growth Engine? World Development 39, 9: 1503–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lora, Eduardo, and Márquez, Gustavo. 1998. The Employment Problem in Latin America: Perceptions and Stylized Facts. Working Paper 371. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Lund, Frances, and Srinivas, Smita. 2005. Learning from Experience: A Gendered Approach to Social Protection for Workers in the Informal Economy. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Maloney, William. 2004. Informality Revisited. World Development 32, 7: 1159–78.Google Scholar
Márquez, Gustavo, and Pagés, Carmen. 1998. Ties that Bind: Employment Protection and Labor Market Outcomes in Latin America. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Marshall, Adriana. 2004. Labour Market Policies and Regulations in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico: Programmes and Impacts. Employment Analysis Unit Working Paper 2004/13. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Marx, Paul. 2014. The Insider-Outsider Divide and Economic Voting: Testing a New Theory with German Electoral Data. Socioeconomic Review 14, 1: 97118. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwu022Google Scholar
Mazza, Jacqueline. 2000. Unemployment Insurance: Case Studies and Lessons for Latin America and the Caribbean. IDB Working Paper 411. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
Pacek, Alexander, and Radcliff, Benjamin. 1995. Economic Voting and the Welfare State: a Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Politics 57, 1 (February): 4461.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harvey, and Whitten, Guy. 2002. Economics, Politics, and the Cost of Ruling in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In Economic Voting, ed. Dorussen, Han and Taylor, Michaell. New York: Routledge. 6691.Google Scholar
Palmer, Harvey, and Whitten, Guy. 2002. 2011. through Thick and Thin? the Dynamics of Government Support across Income Groups during Economic Crises. Electoral Studies 30, 3: 427–37.Google Scholar
Paz, Jorge. 2003. Movilidad entre empleos protegidos y no protegidos en la Argentina. In Historias laborales en la seguridad social. Buenos Aires: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social/Oficina Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). 97125.Google Scholar
Paz, Jorge. 2004. Argentina: dinámica de la protección social y el mercado laboral, 1995–2002. In Protección social y mercado laboral, ed. Bertranou, Fabio. Santiago: ILO.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejando, Castells, Manuel, and Benton, Lauren. 1989. The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pratap, Sangeeta, and Quintin, Erwan. 2006. Are Labor Markets Segmented in Argentina? a Semiparametric Approach. European Economic Review 50, 7: 1817–41.Google Scholar
Queirolo, Rosario. 2013. The Success of the Left in Latin America: Untainted Parties, Market Reforms, and Voting Behavior. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth, and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: a Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93 (September): 575–90.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay, and Verba, Sidney. 1979. Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Friedrich, and Enste, Dominik. 2013. The Shadow Economy: An International Survey. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew. 2011a. Who Says “It's the Economy”? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance. Comparative Political Studies 44, 3 (March): 284312.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew. 2011b. Economic Voting and Welfare Programmes: Evidence from the American States. European Journal of Political Research 50, 4 (June): 479503.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew. 2013. What Goes around Comes around: Perceived Vulnerable Employment and Economic Voting in Developing Countries. European Journal of Political Research 52, 2 (March): 143–63.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew, and Carlin, Ryan. 2013. Context Counts: the Election Cycle, Development, and the Nature of Economic Voting. Journal of Politics 75, 3: 730–42.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Randolph T., and Duch, Raymond. 2013. The Meaning and Use of Subjective Perceptions in Studies of Economic Voting. Electoral Studies. 32 (September): 305–20.Google Scholar
Thornton, Douglas. 2000. Political Attitudes and Participation of Informal and Formal Sector Workers in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies 33 (December): 12791309.Google Scholar
Van der Brug, Wouter, van der Eijk, Cees, and Franklin, Mark. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1983. Recession and Social Classes: Economic Impacts and Political Opinions. Political Behavior 4, 1: 731.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. On the Salience of Political Issues: the Problem with “Most Important Problem.” Electoral Studies, 24, 4 (December): 555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Zizumbo-Colugna, Daniel. 2013. The Varying Political Toll of Concerns about Corruption in Good versus Bad Economic times. Comparative Political Studies 46, 10: 11901218.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Singer supplementary material

Appendices

Download Singer supplementary material(File)
File 21.8 KB