Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T21:26:10.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mala Htun  and
Timothy J. Power
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article analyzes a dataset of policy views of members of the Brazilian Congress to assess the nature of support for genderrelated policy issues. It makes three core claims. First, liberal and progressive opinions on gender correspond to party membership more than to sex. Left parties have consistent and programmatic policy positions on controversial gender issues. Women and men are more divided, as are parties of the center and the right. Second, coalitions supporting change differ across policy issues. Support for gender quotas, for example, does not translate into support for more liberal abortion laws. Third, there is a large gap between legislators' attitudes toward gender-related policy and actual policy outcomes. Institutional deadlock and executive priorities explain this discrepancy. This article concludes that although women may share some interests by virtue of their position in a gender-structured society, these interests may be trumped by partisan, class, regional, and other cleavages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , Winter 2006 , pp. 83 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

References

Alatorre, Anna-Lizbeth. 1999. Government, Parties, Gender, and Democratization: the Causes and Consequences of Women's Participation in the Mexican Congress. B.a. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2002. The Puzzle of Party Discipline in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 44, 1 (Spring): 1–44.Google Scholar
Avelar, Lúcia. 2001. Mulheres na elite política brasileira. São Paulo: Fundação Konrad Adenauer/Editora UNESP.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: a Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Politics 63, 4 (November): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Matthew, McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Diniz, Simone. 2005. Interações entre os poderes executivo e legislativo no processo decisório: avaliando sucesso e fracasso presidencial. Dados 48, 1: 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando, Limongi. 1999. Executivo e legislativo na nova ordem constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fundação Getúlio Vargas.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando, Limongi. 2000. Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics 32, 2 (January): 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. Comparative Politics 25, 3 (April): 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinzpeter, Ximena, and Carla, Lehmann. 1995. Dónde están las fuerzas conservadoras en la sociedad chilena?Perfil a partir de un estudio de opinión pública. Estudios Públicos 60 (Spring).Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2001. Advancing Women's Rights in the Americas: Achievements and Challenges. Working Paper. Leadership Council for Inter-American Summitry. Coral Gables: North-South Center, University of Miami.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2002. Puzzles of Women's Rights in Brazil. Social Research 69, 3 (Fall): 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003a. Sex and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003b. Women and Democracy. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, 2nd edition, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Michael, Shifter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa, Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: the Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates. American Political Science Review 88, 3 (September): 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamounier, Bolivar. 1996. Brazil: The Hyperactive Paralysis Syndrome. In Constructing Democratic Governance: Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1990s, ed. Jorge, I. Domínguez and Abraham, Lowenthal. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1–87.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16 (July): 1–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Fiona. 2000. Getting Gender on the Policy Agenda: A Study of a Brazilian Feminist Lobby Group. In Hidden Histories of Gender and the State in Latin America, ed. Elizabeth, Dore. and Maxine, Molyneux. Durham: Duke University Press. 1–67.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Fiona. 2003. Sexual Politics, Party Politics: the Pt Government's Policies on Gender Equity and Equality. Working Paper Cbs-46–03. Centre for Brazilian Studies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Rachel, Meneguello, and Timothy, J. Power. 2000. Conservative Parties, Economic Reform, and Democracy in Brazil. In Conservative Parties and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Kevin, Middlebrook. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1–222.Google Scholar
McGlen, Nancy, and Meredith, Sarkees. 1993. Women in Foreign Policy: The Insiders. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J. 2000. The Political Right in Postauthoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions, and Democratization. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World. World Politics 51, 4: 1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Almira. 2001. Direitos das mulheres: o que pensam os parlamentares. Brasília: CFEMEA.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 1998. The Emerging Role of Women in Mexican Political Life. In Women's Participation in Mexican Political Life, ed. Rodríguez, Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Victoria E. 2002. Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Rosener, Judy. 1990. Ways Women Lead. Harvard Business Review (November December).Google Scholar
Santos, Fabiano. 1997. Patronagem e poder de agenda na política brasileira. Dados 40, 3: 1–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. 2003. Legislative Representation in Latin America: a Comparative Study of the Descriptive, Substantive, and Symbolic Representation of Women. Ph.D. diss., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Marshall, Ganz, and Ziad, Munson. 2000. A Nation of Organizers: the Institutional Origins of Civic Volunteerism in the United States. American Political Science Review 94, 3: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Carol. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African-Americans in Congress. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabak, Fanny. 2002. Mulheres públicas: participação política e poder. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital.Google Scholar