Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T17:06:20.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cabinet Leadership: Does It Mirror Democratic Change in Mexico?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2018

Roderic Ai Camp
Roderic Ai Camp*
Affiliation:
Professor of government at Claremont McKenna College.
*
RCamp@ca.rr.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An exploration of cabinet leadership in Mexico has always provided insights into political recruitment trends for leading policymakers. An examination of the present cabinet from 2012 through 2016 is valuable for four reasons. First, to what extent does the current leadership reflect changes in compositional patterns of the most influential policymakers as a result of a democratic electoral process dating from 2000? Second, does the return of the PRI reflect traditional patterns established by the last two PRI presidential administrations, or has the present cabinet taken on features that can be attributed to the two previous PAN administrations? Third, have significant patterns emerged, reflected in recent appointments, that suggest influential characteristics exercising broader influences in the future? Fourth, will the most influential cabinet figures under the PRI presidency reestablish their dominance as leading contenders for their party’s presidential election in 2018?

Keywords

cabinetspolitical leadershipelitespolitical recruitmentdemocratic changeMexico
Type
Country Note
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 83 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 University of Miami 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Ryan. 2016. Sons of the Mexican Revolution: Miguel Alemán and His Generation. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Aragón Falomir, Jaime. 2012. De secretarias de estado a parlamentaristas: el reciclaje postalternancia del gabinete de Carlos Salinas de Gortari. In Actas Congreso Internacional América Latina: la autonomía de una region, ed. Heriberto Cairo Carou et al. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. 290–303.Google Scholar
Babb, Sarah. 2001. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline. 2012. Invigorating Federalism: The Emergence of Governors and State Legislatures as Powerbrokers and Policy Innovators. In The Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics, ed. Roderic Ai Camp. New York: Oxford University Press. 119–142.Google Scholar
Beezley, William H., and Camp, Roderic Ai. 2015. Democratizing Mexican Politics: Interview with President Felipe Calderón. October. Digital recording. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History. http://latinamericanhistory.oxfordre.com/_page/videosGoogle Scholar
Beezley, William H., and Camp, Roderic Ai. 2016. Democratizing Mexican Politics: Interview with Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas. January 28. Digital recording. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History. http://latinamericanhistory.oxfordre.com/page/videosGoogle Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1971. The Cabinet and the Técnico in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Comparative Administration 3 (August): 188–213.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1985. The Technocrat in Mexico and the Survival of the Political System. Latin American Research Review 20, 1 (Winter): 97–118.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1995. Political Recruitment Across Two Centuries: Mexico, 1884–1992. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2002. Mexico’s Mandarins: Crafting a Power Elite for the 21st Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2008. Political Recruitment, Governance, and Leadership in Mexico: How Democracy Made a Difference. In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, ed. Peter M. Siavelis and Scott Morgenstern. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 292–315.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2010. The Metamorphosis of Leadership in a Democratic Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 2011. The Revolution’s Second Generation: The Miracle, 1946–1982; Collapse of the PRI, 1982–2000. In A Companion to Mexican History and Culture, ed. William Beezley. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. 472.Google Scholar
Cárdenas, Cuauhtémoc. 2006. Sobre mis pasos. Mexico City: Aguilar.Google Scholar
Carta Paramétrica. 2013. La reforma político-electoral en la opinión pública. 1–7.Google Scholar
Carta Paramétrica. 2017. López Obrador el más competitivo rumbo al 2018. 1–6. www.parametria.com.mx/carta_parametrica.php?cp=4937.Google Scholar
Chang, Peter. 1974. The Japanese Cabinet, 1885–1973: An Elite Analysis. Asian Survey 14 (December): 1055–1071.Google Scholar
Czudnowski, Moshe M. 1982. Does Who Governs Matter? Elite Circulation in Contemporary Societies. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.Press.Google Scholar
Diario de Yucatán (Mérida). 1999. June 20. www.yucatan.com.mxGoogle Scholar
Escobar-Lemmon, María C., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2016. Women in Presidential Cabinets: Power Players or Abundant Tokens? New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Excélsior (Mexico City). 1996. November 16. www.excelsior.com.mx. Accessed November 16, 1996.Google Scholar
Gianmarco, Daniele, and Geys, Benny. 2014. Born in the Purple: Political Dynasties and Politicians’ Human Capital. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Golob, Stephanie. 1997. Making Possible What Is Necessary: Pedro Aspe, the Salinas Team, and the Next Mexican “Miracle.” In Technopols: Freeing Politics and Markets in Latin America in the 1990s, ed. Jorge I. Domínguez. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 95–143.Google Scholar
González y Gonzá, Luis. 1984. La ronda de las generaciones. Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
Hernández Rodrí, Rogelio. 2008. El centro dividido. La nueva autonomía de los gobernadores. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Ingram, Matthew C., and Shirk, David A. 2010. Judicial Reform in Mexico: Toward a New Criminal Justice System. Special Report. San Diego: Transborder Institute, University of San Diego.Google Scholar
Joyce, Robert. 2015a. Mexico’s Moment: The 2012 Presidential Transition. Innovations for Successful Societies. Princeton: Princeton University. https://successfulsocieties.prince-ton.edu/publications/mexicos-moment-2012-presidential-transition.Google Scholar
Joyce, Robert. 2015b. Weathering the Storm: Felipe Calderón’s Office of the Presidency, Mexico, 2006–2012. Innovations for Successful Societies. Princeton: Princeton University. https://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/publications/weathering-storm-felipe-calder%C3%B3n%E2%80%99s-office-presidency-mexico-2006-2012Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2010. Governors and Their Deputies: New Legislative Principals in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly 36: 235–258.Google Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2017. Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival: Mexico’s Evolving PRI. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehoucq, Fabrice, et al. 2005. Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Political Outcomes in Mexico. Mexico City: CIDE.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul H. 1972. The Spanish Ministerial Elite, 1938–1969. Comparative Politics 5 (October): 83–106.Google Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile. 1994. Rebels Without a Cause? The Politics of Entrepreneurs in Chihuahua. Journal of Latin American Studies 26, 1 (February): 137–158.Google Scholar
Nacif, Benito. 2012. The Fall of the Dominant Presidency: Lawmaking Under Divided Government in Mexico. In The Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics, ed. Roderic Ai Camp. New York: Oxford University Press. 234–264.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Norman K.. 1975. Integrative Strategies of a National Elite: Career Patterns in the Indian Council of Ministers. Comparative Politics 7 (July): 533–557.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy J., and Mochel, Marília G. 2008. Political Recruitment in an Executive-Centric System: Presidents, Ministers, and Governors in Brazil. In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, ed. Peter M. Siavelis and Scott Morgenstern. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 218–240.Google Scholar
Saavedra-Herrera, Camilo Emiliano. 2013. Judicialization and the Emergence of the Supreme Court as a Policy-Maker in Mexico. Ph.D. diss., London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Naoko. 2008. Keeping It in the Family: Hereditary Democracy and Family Politics in Japan. In Democratic Reform in Japan: Assessing the Impact, ed. Sherry L. Martin and Gill Steel. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. 65–80.Google Scholar
El Universal. 2005. February 11. eluniversal.com.mxGoogle Scholar
Verner, Joel G. 1970. Characteristics of Administrative Personnel: The Case of Guatemala. Journal of Developing Areas 5 (October): 73–86.Google Scholar
Verner, Joel G. 1973. The Recruitment of Cabinet Ministers in the Former British Caribbean. Journal of Developing Areas 7 (July): 635–652.Google Scholar
Villamil, Jenaro. 2012. Peña Nieto: el político. Proceso, March 30. www.proceso.com.mx/302702/pena-nieto-el-politico. Accessed June 30, 2017.Google Scholar
Wikipedia (Spanish). n.d. Aurelio Nuño Mayer. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurelio_Nu%C3%B1o_MayerGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edward J. 1990. The Resurgent North and Contemporary Mexican Regionalism. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 6, 2 (Summer): 1990: 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar