Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-plp5r Total loading time: 0.259 Render date: 2021-04-11T12:18:33.796Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
Latin American Politics and Society Latin American Politics and Society

Article contents

Repression, Opportunity, and Protest: Explaining the Takeoff of Brazil's Landless Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Gabriel Ondetti
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the mid-1990s, Brazil experienced a rapid intensification of protest for land reform. Official land reform efforts also accelerated, and the issue became a central topic of public concern and debate. This article seeks to account for the abrupt intensification of collective action and to explain its relationship to the other changes, focusing on the political impact of two massacres of landless protesters in 1995 and 1996. These incidents forced authorities to accelerate land reform and to exercise somewhat greater caution in repressing the movement. The shifts in state behavior then helped to accelerate collective action. This argument lends weight to the idea that state repression against a social movement can sometimes serve to engender even greater protest. It also identifies a previously undescribed causal mechanism, political opportunity, linking repression to protest.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , Summer 2006 , pp. 61 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Beraba, Marcelo. 1995. A batalha de Corumbiara. Folha de Sào Paulo, August 11: sec. 1, p. 2.Google Scholar
Branford, Sue, and Jan, Rocha. 2002. Cutting the Wire: The Story of the Landless Movement in Brazil. London: Latin America Bureau.Google Scholar
Brenneisen, Eliane Cardoso. 2001. Relaçòes de poder, dominaçào e resistencia: o MST e os assentamentos rurais. Cascavel: Edunioeste.Google Scholar
Cadji, Anne-Laure. 2000. Brazil's Landless Find Their Voice. NACLA Report on the Americas 33, 5: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campanhola, Clayton, and José, Graziano eds. 2000. O novo rural brasileiro: uma análise nacional e regional. Jaguariúna: Embrapa.Google Scholar
Carneiro, Franciso Galrào. 2000. Brazil: An Assessment of Rural Labor Markets in the 1990s. Unpublished mss. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Cícero 2000. Análise da reestructuraçào produtiva da agroindústria sucro-alcooleira alagoana. Maceió: Edufal.Google Scholar
Centra de Estudos de Opiniào Pública (CESOP).. 1995. Reforma agrária no Brasil: 1962–1995. Opiniào Pública 4, 1: 1–17.Google Scholar
Coelho, Carlos Nayro. 2001. 70 anos de política agrícola no Brasil (1931–2001). Revista Política Agrícola 10, 3 (July-September): 1–58.Google Scholar
Commissào Pastoral da Terra (CPT).. 1990. Conflitos no campo—Brasil. Goiània: CPT.Google Scholar
Commissào Pastoral da Terra (CPT).. 1991. Conflitos no campo—Brasil. Goiània: CPT. [Land occupation data also from these annual reports.Google Scholar
DaCosta, Soledade. 1999. Southeast Regional Coordinator, Rural Workers' Union Federation of the State of Pará (Fetagri). Author interview. Marabá, Pará, October 27.Google Scholar
deFreitas, Janio. 1996. A omissào confessada. Folha de São Paulo, April 21: sec. 1, p. 7.Google Scholar
Grossi, Mauro Eduardo, and José, Graziano 2000. Evoluçào da renda das famílias agrícolas e rurais: Brasil, 1992–1997. in Campanhola and Graziano da Silva 2000. 1–100.Google Scholar
Dias, Guilherme Silva, and Cicely, Moitinho Amaral 2000. Mudanças estruturais na agricultura brasileira, 1980–1998. In Brasil: uma decada em transiçao Rio de Janeiro: Campus. 1–53.Google Scholar
Doimo, Ana Maria. 1995. A vez e a voz do popular: movimentos sociais e participaçào política no Brasil pós-70. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Bernardo Mançano. 1998. Genese e desenvolvimento do MST. Sào Paulo: MST.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Bernardo Mançano. 2000. A formaçào do MST no Brasil. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo 1996a. O outro lado da moeda. August 21: sec. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo 1996b. Tres poderes vào tentar agilizar a reforma agrária. August 21: sec. 1, p. 4.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo 1996c. Sem terra. Special section. June 30.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo 1996d. Ruralistas ameaçam parar reformas. May 5: sec. 1, p. 11.Google Scholar
Folha de São Paulo 2000. Paulistano apóia reforma agrária, mas rejeita invasào. May 13: sec. 1, p. 4.Google Scholar
Francisco, Ronald A., and Mark, Irving Lichbach 2001. Choice or Chance?Microrationality and Macrorandomness in Polish Conflict, 1980–1995. Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, San Francisco, August 30-September 2.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A., and Charles, Tilly. 2001. Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action. In Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–94.Google Scholar
Silva, José. 1999. O novo rural brasileiro. 2nd ed. Campinas: Unicamp.Google Scholar
Silva, José, and Mauro, Eduardo Grossi 2001. Rural Non-Farm Employment and Incomes in Brazil: Patterns and Evolution. World Development 29, 3: 1–53.Google Scholar
Gupta, Dipak K., Harinder, Singh., and Tom, Sprague. 1993. Government Coercion of Dissidents: Deterrence or Provocation Journal of Conflict Resolution 37, 2: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, John L. 1999. Law and Disorder: the Brazilian Landless Farmworkers' Movement. Bulletin of Latin American Research 18, 4: 1–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfand, Steven, and Luis, F. Brunstein. n.d The Changing Structure of the Brazilian Agricultural Sector and the Limitations of the 1995/96 Agricultural Census. Paper written as part of Nemesis, a project on spatial economics at the Instituto de Pesquisa Economica Aplicada (Ipea), Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Opinião Pública e Estatística (IBOPE).. 1998. Pesquisa de opiniào pública sobre a reforma agrária. Summary of national poll conducted March 5–8. Rio de Janeiro: IBOPE.Google Scholar
Instituto de Colonizaçào e Reforma Agrária (INCRA).. 2002. Balanço global de gestão: relatório final. Brasília: INCRA.Google Scholar
Jornal Sem Terra (São Paulo). 1994. Uma eleiçào histórica. July: 2.Google Scholar
Jornal Sem Terra (São Paulo). 1995a. Vamos tirar a reforma agrária do papel. October: 2.Google Scholar
Jornal Sem Terra (São Paulo). 1995b. A reforma agrária avança. November: 2.Google Scholar
Jornal Sem Terra (São Paulo). 1996. Mst tem mais credibilidade do que políticos e policiais. July.Google Scholar
Jornal Sem Terra (São Paulo). 1997. Mst é homenageado do ano do Instituto de Arquitetos. January.Google Scholar
Jornal do DIAP (Brasília). 1995. José Serra diz nào a reforma agrára de Fhc. September-October: 1.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. 1992. The Workers' Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Khawaja, Marwan. 1993. Repression and Popular Collective Action: Evidence from the West Bank. Sociological Forum 8, 1: 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurenti, Antonio Carlos, and Mauro, Eduardo Grossi 2000. A evoluçào das pessoas ocupadas nas atividades agrícolas e não-agrícolas nas áreas rurais do Brasil. in Campanhola and Graziano da Silva 2000. 1–66.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving. 1987. Deterrence or Escalation: the Puzzle of Aggregate Studies of Repression and Dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution 31, 2 (June): 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving, and Ted, Gurr. 1981. The Conflict Process: a Formal Model. Journal of Conflict Resolution 25 (March): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lins, Marcos. 2000. Former president, Incra. Author interview. Brasília, April 28.Google Scholar
Malin, Mauro. 2002. Agricultura e reforma agrária. In A era FHC: um balanço São Paulo: Cultura. 1–214.Google Scholar
Mauro, Gilmar. 2000. Member, Mst National Directorate. Author interview. São Paulo, May 11.Google Scholar
Mauro, Gilmar. 2003. Author interview. Cajamar, São Paulo, August 13.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, ed. McAdam, John McCarthy, and Mayer, Zald.. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 2003. Beyond Structural Analysis: Toward a More Dynamic Understanding of Social Movements. In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, ed. Mario, Diani. and McAdam, . New York: Oxford University Press. 1–98.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Charles, Tilly. 2001. The Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, Leonilde. 1989. História dos movimentos sociais no campo. Rio de Janeiro: Fase.Google Scholar
Medeiros, Leonilde, Maria, Valéria, and Sérgio, Leite 1994. Assentamentos rurais: uma visão multidisciplinar. São Paulo: Editora da UNESP.Google Scholar
Moisés, José Alvaro. 1993. Elections, Political Parties and Political Culture in Brazil: Changes and Continuities. Journal of Latin American Studies 25, 3: 1–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, Zander ed. 1996. Política, protesto e cidadania no campo. Porto Alegre: Editora da Universidade/Ufrgs.Google Scholar
Neri, Marcelo, José, Márcio, and Maurício, Cortez Reis 2000. Mercado de trabalho nos anos 90: fatos estilizados e interpretaçòes. Rio de Janeiro: Ipea.Google Scholar
Olivier, Johan L. 1991. State Repression and Collective Action in South Africa, 1970–1984. South African Journal of Sociology 22: 109–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ondetti, Gabriel A. 2002. Opportunities, Ideas, and Actions: the Brazilian Landless Movement, 1979–2001. Ph.D diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wolfgang, Roehl. 1990. Repression, Micromobilization and Political Protest. Social Forces 69, 2: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Anthony. 1997. The End of the Peasantry: The Rural Labor Movement in Northeast Brazil, 1961–1988. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony. 2003. Brazil's Agrarian Reform: Democratic Innovation or Oligarchic Exclusion Redux Latin American Politics and Society 45, 2: 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petras, James. 1998. The Political and Social Bases of Regional Variation in Land Occupations in Brazil. Journal of Peasant Studies 25 (July): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasler, Karen. 1996. Concessions, Repression, and Political Protest in the Iranian Revolution. American Sociological Review 61 (February): 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sader, Eder. 1988. Quando novos personagens entraram em cena. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Sparovek, Gerd. 2003. A qualidade dos assentamentos da reforma agrária brasileira. São Paulo: Páginas & Letras.Google Scholar
Stedile, Joào Pedro. 2000. Member, Mst National Directorate. Author interview. São Paulo, December 15.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1983. Social Protest and Policy Response during Cycles of Protest. Western Societies Paper no. 15. Ithaca: Center for International Studies, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power In Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Gerson. 1999. Primeiro governo Fhc: dossie reforma agrária e agricultura. Partido dos Trabalhadores. Liderança da bancada na Cåmara Federal. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Gerson. 2001. O exodo rural no Brasil durante o período Fhc. assessoria técnica da liderança da bancada do Pt na Cåmara dos Deputados. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Gerson. 2002. Por um projeto democrático, popular e soberano para o agrário brasileiro. Partido dos Trabalhadores. Liderança da bancada na Cåmara Federal-Núcleo Agrário. Secretaria Agrária Nacional. Unpublished mss.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Veja (São Paulo). 1996. A sombra violento do Mst. August 28.Google Scholar
Veja (São Paulo). 1997a. Mundo de Amanhã. January 8.Google Scholar
Veja (São Paulo). 1997b. A voz ronca da ordem. May 28.Google Scholar
Veja (São Paulo). 1998. Caso de polícia. April 8.Google Scholar
Veja (São Paulo). 1999. Marchando para trás. October 20.Google Scholar
Wagner, Carlos. 1988. A saga do Joào Sem Terra. Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
Wolford, Wendy. 2004. Of Land and Labor: Agrarian Reform on the Sugarcane Plantations of Northeast Brazil. Latin American Perspectives 32, 2: 1–70.Google Scholar
Wright, Angus, and Wendy, Wolford. 2003. To Inherit the Earth: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for a New Brazil. San Francisco: Food First.Google Scholar
Xavier, Carlos. 1999. President, Agricultural Federation of the State of Pará (Faepa). Author interview. Belém, Pará, November 7.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd January 2018 - 11th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

13
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Repression, Opportunity, and Protest: Explaining the Takeoff of Brazil's Landless Movement
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Repression, Opportunity, and Protest: Explaining the Takeoff of Brazil's Landless Movement
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Repression, Opportunity, and Protest: Explaining the Takeoff of Brazil's Landless Movement
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *