Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:03:44.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tecnologia y funcion de las puntas de Paijan: El aporte de la experimentacion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jacques Pelegrin  and
Claude Chauchat
Jacques Pelegrin
Affiliation:
ERA 28, C.N.R.S., 1 Place Aristide Briand, 92190 Meudon, France
Claude Chauchat
Affiliation:
Institut du Quaternaire, UMR 9933 “Milieux Techniques et Cultures Préhistoriques,” Av. des Facultes, Université Bordeaux 1, 33405 Talence cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Resumen

En el curso de las investigaciones sobre el Paijanense de la costa nor-peruana, se estableció un programa de experimentos de talla de las puntas de proyectil llamadas puntas de Paiján. Diez experimentos de talla fueron realizados con implementos y materiales locales y sistemáticamente documentados: definición de las fases del proceso, tiempo de trabajo, recuento y descripción de todas las lascas-desechos, pesos, características de los productos obtenidos al fin de cada fase. Los resultados proporcionan información de orden económico sobre una actividad importante de los paijanenses y tienen consecuencias socio-culturales. Estos resultados se aplicarán al estudio de talleres arqueológicos ya recolectados. La ausencia de fauna terrestre de gran tamaño en los restos alimenticios de los sitios de vivienda y la morfología especial de las puntas sugieren que aquéllas han sido empleadas para atravesar peces marinos de tamaño mediano a grande, los cuales se encuentran en los basurales arqueológicos.

Abstract

Abstract

An experimental replication program for so-called Paiján projectile points was established in the course of investigations into the Paijanense lithic industry of the northern Peruvian coast. Ten replication tests were performed and systematically described, including the definition of phases, duration of work, counting and description of all flakes, and determination of the weights and characteristics of the end products of each phase. The findings provide economic information on an important activity of the Paiján people and have sociocultural implications. These results are now being applied to already collected archaeological chipping floors. The absence of large terrestrial fauna among the food remains of the living sites and the special morphology of the Paiján points suggest that they were used in spearing medium to large ocean fish, the remains of which are found in archaeological middens in the area.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 367 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Referencias Citadas

Bird, J. B. 1948 Preceramic Cultures in Chicama and Virú. En A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology, editado por W. C. Bennett, pp. 21–28. Memoirs No. 4. Society for American Archaeology, Menasha.Google Scholar
Bonavia, D. 1982 El Complejo Chivateros: Una aproximación tecnológica. Revista del Museo National 46:19–37. Lima.Google Scholar
Callahan, E. 1974 Experimental Archaeology Papers. No. 3. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C. 1976 The Paiján Complex, Pampa de Cupisnique, Peru. Ñawpa Pacha 13(1975):85–96, Plates XXIX-XXXVI.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C. 1977 El Paijanense de Cupisnique: Problemática y metodología de los sitios líticos de superficie. Revista del Museo Nacional 43:13–26. Lima.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C. 1979 Additional Observations on the Paiján Complex. Ñawpa Pacha 16(1978):51–64, Plate X.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C. 1987 Niveau Marin, écologie et climat sur la côte nord du Pérou á la transition Pleistocène-Holocène. Bulletin de l’Institut Français des Etudes Andines 16(1–2):21–27. Lima.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C. 1988 Early Hunter-Gatherers on the Peruvian Coast. En Peruvian Prehistory, editado por R. W. Keatinge, pp. 42–66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C. 1991 L’approche technologique dans une étude régionale: Le Paijanien de la côte du Pérou. En 25 ans d’études technologiques en préhistoire, pp. 263–273. 1 lème Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes; Octobre 1990. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pins, France.Google Scholar
Chauchat, C., Wing, E. S., Lacombe, J. P., Demars, P. Y., Uceda, S., y Deza, C. 1992 Préhistoire de la côte nord du Pérou: Le Paijanien de Cupisnique. Cahiers du Quaternaire No. 18. CNRS-Editions, Centre Régional de Publication de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Engel, F. 1957 Sites et établissements sans céramique de la côte péruvienne. Journal de la Société des Américanistes 46:67–155. Paris.Google Scholar
Flenniken, J. 1984 The Past, Present, and Future of Flintknapping: An Anthropological Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 13:187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, P. V., y Madsen, B. 1983 Flint Axe Manufacture in the Neolithic: An Experimental Investigation of a Flint Axe Manufacture Site at Hastrup Vaenget, East Zealand. Journal of Danish Archaeology 2:43–59.Google Scholar
Lanning, E. P., y Hammel, E. 1961 Early Lithic Industries of Western South America. American Antiquity 27:139–154.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, R. 1948 Cronología arqueológica del norte del Perú. Biblioteca del Museo de Arqueología Rafael Larco Herrera, Hacienda Chiclín, Trujillo, Perú.Google Scholar
Ossa, P. P. 1973 A Survey of the Lithic Preceramic Occupation of the Moche Valley, North Coastal Peru; with an Overview of Some Problems in the Study of the Early Human Occupation of West Andean South America. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ossa, P. P., y Moseley, M. E. 1972 La Cumbre, a Preliminary Report on Research into the Early Lithic Occupation of the Moche Valley, Peru. Ñawpa Pacha 9(1971):1–16, Plates I–VII.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. C. 1967 Early Cultural Remains on the Central Coast of Peru. Ñawpa Pacha 4(1966):145–153, Plates XIX–XX.Google Scholar
Pelegrin, J. 1981 Experiments in Bifacial Work: About “Laurel Leaves.” Flintknappers’ Exchange 4(1):6–7.Google Scholar
Pelegrin, J. 1991 Aspects de démarche expérimentale en technologie lithique. En 25 ans d’études technologiques en préhistoire, pp. 57–63. 1 lème Rencontres Internationales d’Archéologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes; Octobre 1990. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pins, France.Google Scholar
Testart, A. 1986 Essai sur les fondements de la division sexuelle du travail chez les chasseurs-collecteurs. Cahiers de l’Homme (n.s.) No. 25. E.P.H.E., Paris.Google Scholar
Uceda, S., y Deza, C. 1979 Estudio de dos talleres liticos en superficie. Tesis de bachillerato no publicada, Programa de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Perú.Google Scholar