Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

What is duality of patterning, anyway?

  • D. Robert Ladd (a1)

Abstract

The notion of duality of patterning (henceforth DoP), at least for readers of this special issue, is probably most closely associated with Charles F. Hockett's project of identifying the ‘design features’ of language in order to characterise the ways in which human language is unique among biological communication systems (Hockett 1958: chapter 64; Hockett 1960; Hockett and Ascher 1964). Roughly speaking, DoP refers to the fact that the meaningful units of language – words or morphemes – are made up of meaningless units – phonemes or features – whose only function is to distinguish the meaningful units from one another. Stated this way, the idea seems quite straightforward, and to have it explicitly stated as a property of language seems a useful insight. In fact, though, of all the design features discussed by Hockett, DoP seems to have engendered the most confusion. The idea that meaningful units are composed of meaningless ones seems simple enough, but many complications arise when we look more closely. The goal of this short paper is to document some of the complications and perhaps alleviate some of the confusion.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Brentari, D. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. 1999. The origins of complex language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coulmas, F. 1989. The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.
Denham, K. & Lobeck, A.. 2010. Linguistics for everyone: An introduction, international edition. Wadsworth, England: Cengage Learning.
Eco, U. 1995 [translated by Fentress, James]. The search for the perfect language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fitch, W. T. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansell, M. 2003. Chinese writing. In Thurgood, G. & LaPolla, R. J. (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 156165. London: Routledge.
Healy, A. F. 1973. Can chimpanzees learn a phonemic language? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2. 167170.
Hewes, G. 1973. Primate communication and the gestural origin of language. Current Anthropology 14. 524.
Hjemlslev, L. 1953. Prolegomena to a theory of language. Supplement to International Journal of American Linguistics.
Hockett, C. F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. London: Macmillan.
Hockett, C. F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203. 88111.
Hockett, C. F. & Ascher, R.. 1964. The human revolution. Current Anthropology 5. 135168.
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Liddell, S. K. 1984. Think and Believe: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60. 372399.
Liddell, S. K. & Johnson, R. E.. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64. 195277.
Martinet, A. 1949. La double articulation linguistique. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 5. 3037.
Martinet, A. 1980. Eléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Armand Colin.
Martinet, A. 1993. Mémoires d'un linguiste: Vivre les langues. Paris: Quai Voltaire.
Perlmutter, D. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 407442.
Pierrehumbert, J. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Gussenhoven, C. & Warner, N. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. 101139. Berlin: DeGruyter.
Pinker, S. & Jackendoff, R.. 2005. The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition 95. 201236.
Rosselló, J. 2006. Combinatorial properties at the roots of language: Duality of patterning and recursion. In Rossello, J. & Martin, J. (eds.), The biolinguistic turn: Issues on language and biology, 162186. Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
Sandler, W. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50. 128.
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Meir, I. & Padden, C.. 2011. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 503543.
Sproat, R. 2000. A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, W. C. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8, University of Buffalo. [Reprinted 2005 in Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10. 3–37].
van der Hulst, H. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10. 209241.
Wilbur, R. 1993. Segments and syllables in ASL phonology. In Coulter, G. R. (ed.), Current issues in ASL phonology (Phonetics and Phonology Vol. 3), 135168. New York: Academic Press.

Keywords

What is duality of patterning, anyway?

  • D. Robert Ladd (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed