Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Toward a theory of semantic representation

  • Gabriella Vigliocco (a1), Lotte Meteyard (a1), Mark Andrews (a1) and Stavroula Kousta (a1)

Abstract

We present an account of semantic representation that focuses on distinct types of information from which word meanings can be learned. In particular, we argue that there are at least two major types of information from which we learn word meanings. The first is what we call experiential information. This is data derived both from our sensory-motor interactions with the outside world, as well as from our experience of own inner states, particularly our emotions. The second type of information is language-based. In particular, it is derived from the general linguistic context in which words appear. The paper spells out this proposal, summarizes research supporting this view and presents new predictions emerging from this framework.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence addresses: Gabriella Vigliocco, Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences Research Department, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H OAP, UK. E-mail: g.vigliocco@ucl.ac.uk.

References

Hide All
Adolphs, R., Baron-Cohen, S. & Tranel, D.. 2002. Impaired recognition of social emotions following amygdala damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14. 12641274.
Algom, D., Chajut, E. & Lev, S.. 2004. A rational look at the Emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133. 323338.
Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M.. 2004. The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology 117. 389410.
Andrews, M. A., Vinson, D. P. & Vigliocco, G.. 2009. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review 116. 463498.
Balota, D., Cortese, M., Hutchison, K., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J., Nelson, D., Simpson, G., Treiman, R. & Yap, M.. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behaviour Research Methods 39(3). 445459.
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Brain and Behavioural Sciences 22. 577660.
Barsalou, L. W., Barbey, A. K., Simmons, W. Kyle & Wilson, C. D.. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2). 8491.
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K. & Wilson, C. D.. in press. Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In Vega, M. De, Glenberg, A. M. & Graesser, A. C. (eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloom, L. 1998. Language acquisition in its developmental context. In Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. S. (eds.), Handbook of child psychology 2, 309370. New York: Wiley.
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M.. 2002. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13. 185188.
Boulenger, V., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., Nazir, T. A., Paulignan, Y. & Roy, A. C.. 2006. Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behaviour in the first 200msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(10). 16071615.
Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J.. 1999. Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical report C-1). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J.. 2000. Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology 37. 204215.
Bretherton, I. & Beeghly, M.. 1982. Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology 18. 906921.
Britten, K. H., Movshon, J. A., Newsome, W. T. & Shadlen, M. N.. 1992. The analysis of visual motion: A comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. Journal of Neuroscience 12. 47454765.
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L.., Fogassi, L., Gallese, L., Seitz, V., Zilles, R. J., Rizzolatti, G. & Freund, H. J.. 2001. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 13. 400404.
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioural study. Cognitive Brain Research 24. 355363.
Burgess, C. & Lund, K.. 1997. Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context-space. Language and Cognitive Processes 12. 177210.
Bush, G., Luu, P. & Posner, M. I.. 2000. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science 4. 215222.
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F.. 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82(6). 407428.
Coulson, S. 2000. Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cree, G. S. & McRae, K.. 2003. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132. 163201.
Crutch, S. & Warrington, E.. 2005. Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. Brain 128. 615627.
Decety, J. & Grezes, J.. 2006. The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behaviour. Cognitive Brain Research. 1079. 414.
Dolan, R. J. 2002. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 298(5596). 11911194.
Estes, Z. & Adelman, J. S.. 2008. Automatic vigilance for negative words is categorical and general. Emotion 8. 453457.
Eviatar, Z. & Zaidel, E.. 1991. The effects of word length and emotionality on right hemisphere contribution to lexical decision. Neuropschologia 29(5). 415428.
Farah, M. J. & McClelland, J. L.. 1991. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality-specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120. 339357.
Fodor, J. 1976. The language of thought. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Fodor, J. A., Garrett, M. F., Parkes, C. H. & Walker, E. C. T.. 1980. Against definitions. Cognition 8. 263367.
Firth, J. R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. 132. Special Volume, Philological Society.
Gaillard, R., Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Cul, A. Del, Naccache, L. & Vinckier, F.. 2006. Nonconscious semantic processing of emotional words modulates conscious access. PNAS 103. 75247529.
Gallese, V. & Lakoff, G.. 2005. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22. 455479.
Gibbs, R. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. 2006. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A. & Trueswell, J. C.. 2005. Hard words. Language Learning and Development 1. 2364.
Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D. A.. 2000. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language 43. 379401.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P.. 2003. The body's contribution to language. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 43, 93126. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Glenberg, A. & Gallese, V.. submitted. Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension and production.
Glenberg, A. M., Cattaneo, L. & Sato, M.. 2008. Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology 18. R290R291.
Graesser, A. C., Hopkinson, P. L. & Schmid, C.. 1987. Differences in interconcept organization between nouns and verbs. Journal of Memory and Language 26. 242253.
Green, B. F. 1961. Figure coherence in the kinetic depth Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 62. 272282.
Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M. & Tenenbaum, J. B.. 2007. Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review 114. 211244.
Harnad, S. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica 42. 335.
Harris, Z. 1954. Distributional structure. Word 10. 146162.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermuller, F.. 2004. Somatotopic representation of actions words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41. 301307.
Hinton, G. E. & Shallice, T.. 1993. Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review 98. 7495.
Huttenlocher, J. & Lui, F.. 1979. The semantic organization of some simple nouns and verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 141179.
Jackendof, R. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kanske, P. & Kotz, S. A.. 2007. Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research 1138. 138148.
Kaschak, M. P., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H. & Zwaan, R.. 2005. Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition 94. B79B89.
Kaschak, M. P., Aveyard, M., Yaxley, R. H. & Zwaan, R.. 2006. Perception of auditory motion affects language processing. Cognitive Science 30. 733744.
Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S. & Wiley, C.. 2007. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: evidence from fMRI, Brain and Language 107. 1643.
Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P. & Vigliocco, G.. 2009. Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition 112. 473481.
Kousta, S., Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G. & Vinson, D. P. (submitted). The representation of abstract word meanings. Why emotion matters.
Lakof, G. & Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
Landauer, T. & Dumais, S.. 1997. A solutions to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104. 211240.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M. & Cuthbert, B. N.. 1990. Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review 97. 377395.
Larsen, R. J., Balota, D. A. & Mercer, K. A.. 2006. Lexical characteristics of words used in emotional Stroop experiments. Emotion 6. 6272.
Levinson, E. & Sekuler, R.. 1976. Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion. Vision Research 16. 779781.
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M., Meyer, A. S. & Roelofs, A.. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 138.
Lund, K. & Burgess, C.. 1996. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers 28. 203208.
McRae, K., de Sa, V. R. & Seidenberg, M. S.. 1997. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126. 99130.
Meteyard, L., Baharami, B. & Vigliocco, G.. 2007. The perceptual grounding of motion verbs. Psychological Science 11. 10071013.
Meteyard, L. & Vigliocco, G.. 2008. The role of sensory and motor information in semantic representation: A review. In Calvo, P. and Gomila, A. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach. Oxford: Elsevier.
Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B., Vigliocco, G. & Zokaei, N.. 2008. Now you see it: Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words. Current Biology 18. R732733.
Naccache, L., Adam, C., Baulac, M., Clemenceau, S., Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Gaillard, R. & Hasboun, D.. 2005. A direct intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102. 77137717.
Nakamura, K., Hanajima, R., Hara, N., Kouider, S., Sakai, K., Takayama, Y. & Ugawa, Y.. 2003. Task-guided selection of the dual neural pathways for reading. Neuron 52. 557564.
Nelson, D., McEvoy, C. & Schreiber, T.. 1996. Word association norms. http://u3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
Oliveri, M., Caramazza, A., Finocchiaro, C., Gangitano, M., Pascual-Leone, A. & Shapiro, K.. 2004. All talk and no action: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of motor cortex activation during action word production. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(3). 374381.
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Ilmoniemi, R. J. & Nikulin, V. V.. 2005. Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 21. 793797.
Ridgeway, D., Kuczaj, S. A. II & Waters, E.. 1985. Acquisition of emotion-descriptive language: Receptive and productive vocabulary norms for ages 18 months to 6 years. Developmental Psychology 21. 9013–908.
Rizzolatti, G & Craighero, L.. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27. 169192.
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B.. 1975. Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573605.
Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M. & Binder, J. R.. 2005. Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage 27. 188200.
Scase, M. O., Braddick, O. J. & Raymond, J. E.. 1996. What is noise for the motion system? Vision Research 36. 25792586.
Schutze, H. 1992. Dimensions of meaning. IEEE Computer Society Press.
Schwanenflugel, P. 1991. Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In Schwanenflugel, P. (ed.), The psychology of word meanings, 223250. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simmons, K., Hamann, S. B., Harenski, C. N., Hu, X. P. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2008. fMRI evidence for word association and situation simulation in conceptual processing.
Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. & Davis, C. J.. 2006. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 38. 598605.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Danna, M., Gallese, V., Saccuman, M. C. & Scifo, P.et al. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(2). 273281.
Tsushima, Y., Sasaki, Y. & Watanabe, T.. 2006. Greater disruption due to failure of inhibitory control on an ambiguous distractor. Science 15(314). 17861788.
Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G.. 2000. Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In Barcelona, A. (ed.), Metonymy and metaphor at the crossroads. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vigliocco, G., Damian, M. F., Vinson, D. P. & Levelt, W.. 2002. Semantic distance effects on object and action naming. Cognition 85. B61B69.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Lewis, W. & Garrett, M. F.. 2004. The meanings of object and action words. Cognitive Psychology 48. 422488.
Vigliocco, G., Warren, J., Siri, S., Arciuli, J., Scott, S. & Wise, R.. 2006. The role of semantics and grammatical class in the neural representation of words Cerebral Cortex 16. 17901796.
Vigliocco, G. & Vinson, D. P.. 2007. Semantic representation. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vinson, D. P., Vigliocco, G., Cappa, S. F. & Siri, S.. 2003. The breakdown of semantic knowledge: Insights from a statistical model of meaning representation. Brain and Language 86. 347442.
Warrington, E. K. & McCarthy, R. A.. 1994. Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics. Neuropsychologia 32. 14651473.
Wellman, H. M., Banerjee, M., Harris, P. L. & Sinclair, A.. 1995. Early understandings of emotion: Evidence from natural language. Cognition and Emotion 9. 117149.
Zwaan, R. 2004. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, vol. 44. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed