Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Meaningless words promote meaningful categorization

  • GARY LUPYAN (a1) and DANIEL CASASANTO (a2)

Abstract

On traditional accounts, word meanings are entries in a mental lexicon. Nonsense words lack such entries, and are therefore meaningless. Here, we show that under some circumstances nonsense words function indistinguishably from conventional words. The ‘nonsense’ words foove and crelch led participants to select systematically different clusters of adjectives and were reliably matched to different species of alien creatures (e.g., ‘crelches’ were pointy and narrow and ‘fooves’ were large and fat). In a categorization task in which participants learned to group two species of aliens primarily on the basis of roundness/pointiness, these novel labels facilitated performance as much as conventional words (e.g., round, pointy). The results expand the scope of research on sound symbolism and support a non-traditional view of word meaning according to which words do not have meanings by virtue of a conventionalized form−meaning pairing. Rather, the ‘meaning’ of a word is the effect that the word form has on the user’s mental activity.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Gary Lupyan, 1202 W. Johnson St. Rm. 419, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706. email: lupyan@wisc.edu

References

Hide All
Aveyard, M. (2012). Some consonants sound curvy: effects of sound symbolism on object recognition. Memory & Cognition, 40 (1), 8392.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 390412.
Bloom, P., & Keil, F. C. (2001). Thinking through language. Mind & Language, 16 (4), 351367.
Cabrera, A., & Billman, D. (1996). Language-driven concept learning: deciphering Jabberwocky. Journal of Experimental Psychology—Learning Memory and Cognition, 22 (2), 539555.
Carroll, L. (2010 [1871]). Through the looking glass and what Alice found there. London: Penguin Books Limited.
Casasanto, D., & Lupyan, G. (in press). All concepts are ad hoc concepts. In Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (Eds.), Concepts: new directions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. (1983). Making sense of nonce sense. In d’Arcais, G. B. F. & Jarvella, R. J. (Eds.), The process of language understanding (pp. 297331). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dilkina, K., McClelland, J. L., & Plaut, D. C. (2010). Are there mental lexicons? The role of semantics in lexical decision. Brain Research, 1365, 6681.
Dingemanse, M. (2011). Ezra Pound among the Mawu: ideophones and iconicity in Siwu. In Michelucci, P.Fischer, O., & Ljungberg, C. (Eds.), Semblance and signification (pp. 3954). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Edmiston, P., & Lupyan, G. (2013). Verbal and nonverbal cues activate concepts differently, at different times. In Knauff, M.Pauen, M.Sebanz, N., & Wachsmuth, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 22432248). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Elman, J. L. (2004). An alternative view of the mental lexicon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (7), 301306.
Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33 (4), 547582.
Elman, J. L. (2011). Lexical knowledge without a lexicon? The Mental Lexicon, 6 (1), 133.
Evans, V. (2009). How words mean lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, V. (forthcoming). The language myth: uncovering the true nature of language, mind and being human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gauthier, I., James, T. W., Curby, K. M., & Tarr, M. J. (2003). The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20 (3-6), 507523.
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109 (1), 5465.
Jackendoff, R. S. (2002). Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 434446.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Holt.
Johnson, M. A., & Goldberg, A. E. (2013). Evidence for automatic accessing of constructional meaning: Jabberwocky sentences prime associated verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28 (10), 14391452.
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound‐symbolism facilitates word learning in English‐speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35 (3), 575586.
Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology: an introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114 (1), 1928.
Kunkler-Peck, A. J., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Hearing shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 26 (1), 279294.
Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50 (4), 315353.
Ludwig, V. U., Adachi, I., & Matsuzawa, T. (2011). Visuoauditory mappings between high luminance and high pitch are shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (51), 2066120665.
Lupyan, G. (2008). From chair to ‘chair’: a representational shift account of object labeling effects on memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137 (2), 348369.
Lupyan, G. (2012). What do words do? Towards a theory of language-augmented thought. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 57, pp. 255297). Academic Press. Online: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123942937000078>.
Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2007). Language is not just for talking: labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychological Science, 18 (12), 10771082.
Lupyan, G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2012). The evocative power of words: activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means. Journal of Experimental Psychology—General, 141 (1), 170186.
Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: sound−shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9 (3), 316322.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M. H., & Fitneva, S. A. (2011). The arbitrariness of the sign: learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 140 (3), 325347.
Monaghan, P., Mattock, K., & Walker, P. (2012). The role of sound symbolism in language learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38 (5), 11521164.
Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 225252.
Nuckolls, J. B. (2010). The sound-symbolic expression of animacy in Amazonian Ecuador. Diversity, 2 (3), 353369.
Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112 (1), 181186.
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound−shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114 (2), 173186.
Parise, C., & Spence, C. (2012). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research, 220 (3), 319333.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00227.
Perry, L. K., & Lupyan, G. (in press). The role of language in multi-dimensional categorization: evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation and exposure to verbal labels. Brain and Language.
Pullum, G. K. (1989). The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 7 (2), 275281.
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia–a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (12), 334.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: the ARC - nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 55 (4), 13391362.
Shintel, H., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2007). The sound of motion in spoken language: visual information conveyed by acoustic properties of speech. Cognition, 105 (3), 681690.
Snedeker, J., & Gleitman, L. (2004). Why is it hard to label our concepts? In Hall, D. G. & Waxman, S. R. (Eds.), Weaving a lexicon (illustrated edition., pp. 257294). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73 (4), 971995.
Taylor, J. R. (2012). The mental corpus: how language is represented in the mind. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, P. D., & Estes, Z. (2011). Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64 (12), 23922404.
Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language, 93 (1), 1019.
Winter, B. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv:1308.5499 [cs]. Online:<http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5499>.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed