Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Interfering ACE on comprehending embodied meaning in action-related Chinese counterfactual sentences

  • HUILI WANG (a1), XIAOLI YAN (a1), SHUO CAO (a1), LINXI LI (a1) and ADA KRITIKOS (a2)...

Abstract

The present study explores whether embodied meaning is activated in comprehension of action-related Mandarin counterfactual sentences. Participants listened to action-related Mandarin factual or counterfactual sentences describing transfer events (actions towards or away from the participant), and then performed verb-compatible or -incompatible motor action after a transfer verb (action towards or away from the participant) onset. The results demonstrated that motor simulation, specifically the interfering action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE), was obtained in both factual and counterfactual sentences. Additionally, the temporal course of motor resonance was slightly different between factual and counterfactual sentences. We concluded that embodied meaning was activated in action-related Chinese counterfactual sentences. The results supported a neural network model of Chersi, Thill, Ziemke, and Borghi (2010), proposed within the embodiment approach, which explains the interaction between processing action-related sentences and motor performance. Moreover, we speculated that the neural network model of Chersi et al. was also applicable to action-related Mandarin counterfactual comprehension.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Xiaoli Yan: e-mail: xiaoliy@aliyun.com

Footnotes

Hide All
1

The research was supported by the Research Funds for the School of International Education at Dalian University of Technology (Grant No. SIE18RZD1) and the Key Project of the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China (Grant No. DUT18RW212).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Azizzadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G. & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology 16(18), 18181823.
Au, T. K. (1983). Chinese and English counterfactuals: the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis revisited. Cognition 15(1): 155187.
Barbey, A. K., Krueger, F. & Grafman, J. (2009). Structured event complexes in the medial prefrontal cortex support counterfactual representations for future planning. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 364(1521), 12911300.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1), 617645.
Barsalou, L. W., Kyle, W. S., Barbey, A. K. & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2), 8491.
Binder, J. R. & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(11), 527536.
Bloom, A. H. (1981). The linguistic shaping of thought: a study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the west. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bonini, L., Rozzi, S., Serventi, F. U., Simone, L., Ferrari, P. F. & Fogassi, L. (2010). Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. Cerebral Cortex 20(6), 13721385.
Borreggine, K. L. & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action-sentence compatibility effect: it’s all in the timing. Cognitive Science 30(6), 10971112.
Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M. & Nazir, T. A. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(10), 16071615.
Brass, M., Bekkering, H. & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica 106(1/2), 322.
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined tms and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research 24(3), 355363.
Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(10), 426431.
Byrne, R. M. (2007). Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 30(5/6), 439453.
Chen, G. H. (1988). A comparison between English and Chinese hypothetical conditionals. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 1, 1018.
Chersi, F., Thill, S., Ziemke, T. & Borghi, A. M. (2010). Sentence processing: linking language to motor chains. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 4, 19.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: a systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33(1/2), 2562.
de Vega, M., Moreno, V. & Castillo, D. (2011). The comprehension of action-related sentences may cause interference rather than facilitation on matching actions. Psychological Research 77(1), 2030.
de Vega, M. & Urrutia, M. (2011). Counterfactual sentences activate embodied meaning: an action–sentence compatibility effect study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23(8), 962973.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, H. J. & Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: an eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory & Language 58(3), 609626.
Fischer, M. H. & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6), 825850.
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F. & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308(5722), 662667.
Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: the neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience 3(3/4), 317333.
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language 21(3), 434458.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3), 558565.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41(2), 301307.
Kaschak, M. P. & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 883895.
Jiang, Y. (2000). Counterfactual interpretations of Chinese conditionals. Studies and Explorations on Syntax (Chinese) 10, 257279.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. (2002). Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review 109(4), 646678.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Liu, L. G. (1985). Reasoning counterfactually in Chinese: Are there any obstacles? Cognition 21(3), 239270.
Markman, K., Suhr, J. A. & Klein, W. M. P. (2012). Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. Innovation in Language Learning & Teaching 23(3), 256261.
Papesh, M. H. (2015). Just out of reach: on the reliability of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 144(6), e116e141.
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7), 576582.
Qian, Y. A. (2016) Corpus-based study of counterfactuals in Mandarin. Language and Linguistics 17(6), 891915.
Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin 121(1), 133148.
Santamaría, C., Espino, O. & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31(5), 11491154.
Santana, E. & de Vega, M. (2011). Metaphors are embodied, and so are their literal counterparts. Frontiers in Psychology 2(4), 112. doi=10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00090
Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V. & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain & Language 105(2), 8390.
Schuil, K. D. I., Smits, M. & Zwaan, R. A. (2013). Sentential context modulates the involvement of the motor cortex in action language processing: an fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7(1), 113.
Shao, J. (1988). Linguistic diversity and ideational diversity: a review of the study of Chinese and English counterfactuals. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 1, 29.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P. & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(2), 273281.
Thompson, V. A. & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Reasoning counterfactually: making inferences about things that didn’t happen. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28(6), 11541170.
Wang, C. H. (2016). The accessible factors of counterfactual meaning of Chinese conditionals: a composite system. Chinese Language Learning 1, 1220.
Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Yuan, Y. L. (2015). Conterfactual expressions in Chinese and the distinctive thinking they reflect. Chinese Journal of Social Science 8, 126144.
Zhuo, J. S. (2017). What are they good for? A constructionist account of counterfactuals in ordinary Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 113, 3052.
Zwaan, R. A. & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology 135(1), 111.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed