Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T03:43:24.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A blending analysis of metaphors and metonymies used to depict the deal of the century by Jordanian cartoonists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2023

Aseel Zibin Open the ORCID record for Aseel Zibin [Opens in a new window]  and
Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh Open the ORCID record for Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh [Opens in a new window]
Aseel Zibin
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh*
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: a.altakhaineh@ju.edu.jo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzes 30 cartoons depicting the Deal of the Century as envisaged by two Jordanian cartoonists. Conceptual Blending Theory (Fauconnier and Turner [2008, Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press, 53–66]) and Multimodal Metaphor Theory (Forceville, 2008) are adopted as theoretical frameworks. The results reveal that the target domain the Deal of the Century was conceptualized mainly through layered metaphors that have metonymic basis and event metaphors/allegories. Five groups were identified: object or a situation involving objects, situations involving humans/hybrids of humans and objects, an animal or situation involving animal, hybrids of weapons and humans, and event metaphors used to build a story/allegory. The results demonstrate that the most widely used configuration to construe the metaphors was cross-modal of the type pictorial source–verbal target in line with Lan and Zuo (2016, Metaphor and the Social World 6, 20–51). This was probably due to the greater conceptual density and concreteness of visual representation as the target is better captured verbally because of its abstractness. In contrast, the source domains were mainly concrete and thus perceivable pictorially rather than verbally. The study mainly demonstrates the effect that metaphor and metonymy found in political cartoons can have on the perception of the target domain by the audience and by extension their attitude toward it.

Keywords

Cognitive semanticsvisual metaphormetonymypolitical cartoons
Type
Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 377 - 404
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Raheem, A. (2019). Pictorial framing in moral politics: A corpus-based experimental study. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429435089Google Scholar
Abdel-Raheem, A. (2020). Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics, 30 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1777641Google Scholar
Abdullah, S., & Zibin, A. (2021). Monomodal and multimodal metaphors and metonymies depicting the Syrian conflict: Evidence from pro-opposition cartoons. The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies, 19(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7882/CGP/v19i02/61-79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu Nimah, H. (2020). The ‘Deal of the Century’: Revealed and reviled. https://www.jordantimes.com/opinion/hasan-abu-nimah/‘deal-century’-revealed-and-reviledGoogle Scholar
Alazazmeh, H., & Zibin, A. (n.d.). The conceptualization of anger through metaphors, metonymies and metaphtonymies in Jordanian Arabic and English: A contrastive study. Cognitive Semantics [in press].Google Scholar
Al-Momani, K., Badarneh, M. A., & Migdadi, F. (2017). A semiotic analysis of political cartoons in Jordan in light of the Arab Spring. Humor, 30(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AlRubaian, H. (2014). Cross-cultural examination of the use of multimodal metaphor in English and Arabic cartoons of the ‘Arab Spring’ in Egypt. Universidad Complutense De Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/38490/Google Scholar
Baek, J. (2016). Visual metaphorical conceptualization of the Syrian refugees crisis in political cartoons. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Barcelona, A. (2003). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update. In Dirven, R. & Pörings, R. (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 207–278). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bobrova, L. (2015). A procedure for identifying multimodal metaphors in TV commercials. Multimodal Communication, 4(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J. (2020). Trump’s Middle East peace plan: ‘Deal of the century’ is huge gamble. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-51263815Google Scholar
Cao, S., Wang, H., & Zou, X. (2018). The effect of visual structure of pictorial metaphors on advertisement attitudes. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(4), 1–60. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijmsjn/v10y2020i4p60.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. (2016). Figurativeness, conceptual metaphor, and blending. In Semino, E. & Demjén, Z. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 28–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315672953-12/figurativeness-conceptual-metaphor-blending-barbara-dancygierGoogle Scholar
Danjoux, I. (2007). Reconsidering the decline of the editorial cartoon. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(2), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507070370Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, G. T., & Forceville, C. (2009). Multimodal expressions of the human victim is animal metaphor in horror films. In Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 197–212). Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366Google Scholar
El Refaie, E. (2009). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8(2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ersan, M. (2020). Israeli promises to annex Jordan Valley threaten peace deal with Amman. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israeli-leaders-promises-annex-jordan-valley-threaten-peace-treaty-ammanGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In Gibbs, R. (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 53–66). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Kristiansen, G., Achard, M., Dirven, R., & de Mendoza Ibáñez, R. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. (2007). Multimodal metaphor in ten Dutch TV commercials. Public Journal of Semiotics, 1(1), 19–51. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/731348/67355_270204.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in Pictures and multimodal representations. In Gibbs, R (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (462–482). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C. (2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In Klug, N. & Stöckl, H. (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im Multimodalen Kontext (pp. 241–260). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.) (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2014). Embodied metaphor. In Littlemore, J. & Taylor, J. (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 167–184). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Goossens, L. (1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. (2002). Framing and Temporality in Political cartoons: A critical analysis of visual news discourse. Canadian Review of Sociology, 39(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, S. (2018). Political cartoons as critical commentaries of the past. Maynooth University. https://www.academia.edu/38071058/_2018_Political_Cartoons_as_Critical_Commentaries_of_the_Past._New_Perspectives_Postgraduate_Symposium_on_the_Humanities_Unseen_Voices_Representations_Interpretations_and_Reconstructions_Maynooth_University_Ireland_12-13_October_2018Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The mind in the body: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago\London: The University of Chicago press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2021). Standard and extended conceptual theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic issues. In Xu, W. & Taylor, J. R. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 191–204). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, C., & Zuo, D. (2016). Pictorial–verbal metaphors in Chinese editorial cartoons on food safety. Metaphor and the Social World, 6(1), 20–51. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.02lanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2001). Processing pictorial metaphor in advertising: a cross-cultural view. Academic Research, 1, 19–42. https://www.linguistlist.org/pubs/papers/browse-papers-action.cfm?PaperID=682Google Scholar
Mazid, B. E. M. (2008). Cowboy and misanthrope: A critical (discourse) analysis of Bush and bin Laden cartoons. Discourse & Communication, 2(4), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481308095939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negro-Alousque, I. (2014). Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 57, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. (2018). Metaphors, stories, and media framing of crime: Response to Lithwick. In Hanne, M. & Weisberg, R. (Eds.), Narrative and metaphor in the Law (pp. 269–288). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381734.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowson, M. (2015). Satire, sewers, and statesmen: Why James Gillray was king of the cartoon. The Guardian, 16.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. R. (2020). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 71, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilperoord, J. (2013). Raising the issue: A mental-space approach to Iwo Jima-inspired editorial cartoons. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.768513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A. (2009). Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 213–240). Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation, and language. In Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., & Bernárdez, E. (Eds.), Body, language, and mind (vol. 2): Sociocultural Situatedness (pp. 109–136). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199116Google Scholar
Silaski, N., & Durovic, T. (2017). Saving the euro – A multimodal analysis of metaphors depicting the Eurozone crisis. Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 33, 125–146. http://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/160Google Scholar
Walker, R. (2003). Political cartoons: Now you see them! Canadian Parliamentary Review, 26(1), 16–21.Google Scholar
Whittock, T. (1990). Metaphor and Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Younes, A. S., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. (2022). Metaphors and metonymies used in memes to depict COVID-19 in Jordanian social media websites. Ampersand, 9, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100087CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zibin, A. (2022). Monomodal and multimodal metaphors in editorial cartoons on the coronavirus by Jordanian cartoonists. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(1), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zibin, A., & Abdullah, A. D. (2019). The conceptualization of tolerance in the UAE press media: A case study of ‘The Year of Tolerance’. Open Linguistics, 5(1), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zibin, A., & Altakhaineh, A. R. M. S. (2018). An analysis of Arabic metaphorical and/or metonymical compounds: A cognitive linguistic approach. Metaphor and the Social World, 8(1), 100–133. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.16023.zibCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Zibin and Altakhaineh supplementary material

Appendix

Download Zibin and Altakhaineh supplementary material(File)
File 2.4 MB