Skip to main content Accessibility help

Kant on God’s Intuitive Understanding: Interpreting CJ §76’s Modal Claims

  • Reed Winegar (a1)


In §76 of the third Critique, Kant claims that an intuitive understanding would represent no distinction between possible and actual things. Prior interpretations of §76 take Kant to claim that an intuitive understanding would produce things merely in virtue of thinking about them and, thus, could not think of merely possible things. In contrast, I argue that §76’s modal claims hinge on Kant’s suggestion that God represents things in their thoroughgoing determination, including in their connection to God’s actual will. I conclude by using my interpretation to argue that §76’s modal claims do not entail Spinozism.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Baumgarten, A.G. (2013) Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials. Ed. Courtney D. Fugate and John Hymers. London: Bloomsbury.
Boehm, Omri (2014) Kant’s Critique of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Düsing, Klaus (1968) Die Teleologie in Kants Weltbegriff. Bonn: H. Bouvier.
Förster, Eckart (2011) Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Kant, Immanuel (1900ff.) Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, and Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kant, Immanuel (1992ff.) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Ed. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohl, Markus (2015) ‘Kant on the Inapplicability of the Categories to Things in Themselves’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23, 90114.
Kreimendahl, Lothar (1988) ‘Kants Kolleg über Rationaltheologie. Fragmente einer bislang unbekannten Vorlesungsnachschrift’. Kant-Studien, 79, 318328.
Leech, Jessica (2014) ‘Making Modal Distinctions: Kant on the Possible, the Actual, and the Intuitive Understanding’. Kantian Review, 19, 339365.
Leibniz, G.W. (1989) Philosophical Essays. Ed. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Leibniz, G.W. (1999) Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, vol. 4, part A. Ed. Leibniz-Forschungstelle der Universität Münster. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Lord, Beth (2011) Kant and Spinozism: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence from Jacobi to Deleuze. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
McLaughlin, Peter (2014) ‘Mechanical Explanation in the “Critique of the Teleological Power of Judgment”’. In Ina Goy and Eric Watkins (eds), Kant’s Theory of Biology (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 149166.
Meier, G. F. (1755–9) Metaphysik. Halle: J. J. Gebauer.
Proops, Ian (2014) ‘Kant on the Cosmological Argument’. Philosopher’s Imprint, 14, 121.
Pimpinella, Pietro (2001) ‘“ Cognitio intuitiva” bei Wolff und Baumgarten’. In Michael Oberhausen et al. (eds), Vernunftkritik und Aufklärung. Studien zur Philosophie Kants und seines Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog), pp. 265294.
Schwaiger, Clemens (2001) ‘Symbolische und intuitive Erkenntnis bei Leibniz, Wolff und Baumgarten’. In Hans Poser et al. (eds), VII. Internationaler Leibniz Kongress Berlin, 10.–14. September 2001. Nihil sine ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G.W. Leibniz. Vorträge 3. Teil (Hanover: Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft), pp. 11781184.
Wolff, Christian (1983) Vernünfftigen Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt . Ed. Charles A. Corr. Hildesheim: Olms.
Zammito, John H. (1992) The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Kant on God’s Intuitive Understanding: Interpreting CJ §76’s Modal Claims

  • Reed Winegar (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.