Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:36:23.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Deduction: Some Suggestions for Future Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2018

Andrew Brook
Andrew Brook*
Affiliation:
Carleton University
*
Email: andrewbrook@carleton.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since I agree with Schulting’s conclusions, my comments consist mostly of suggestions for further work that he could do, for example further issues that he might want to look into and passages that might give him trouble. One such issue is what is now sometimes called the Localization Problem: if the mind supplies temporal and (where present) spatial organization and most (at least most) conceptual structure to the manifold of intuition, what could be used to place bits of the manifold at one place rather than another, to determine that this concept rather than that applies, and the like? I urge that this in fact a very serious problem for Kant. Among passages that might create a problem for Schulting’s reading, I focus on the Refutation of Idealism, which Kant added to the second (B-)edition.

Keywords

temporalspatial and conceptual structurethe Localization Problemthe Refutation of Idealism
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 89 - 97
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brook, A. (1992) ‘Kant’s A Priori Methods for Recognizing Necessary Truths’. In Philip Hanson and Bruce Hunter (eds), The A Priori Revisited. Canadian Journal of Philosophy supplementary volume 18, 215–252.Google Scholar
Brook, A. (2011) ‘Representation and Reality: Kant’s Two Views’. In Oliver Thorndike (ed.), Rethinking Kant, vol. 3 (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), pp. 219–248.Google Scholar
Brook, A. (forthcoming) ‘Obscure Representations’. In J. Wuerth (ed.), The Cambridge Kant Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, L. (1995) Kant’s Intuitionism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. (1987) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1929 [1781/1787]) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith as Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason . London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., 1929.Google Scholar