Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T21:49:43.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Mysticism or Critical Ethos? Intercultural Reflections on Stephen Palmquist’s Kant and Mysticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2020

Eric S. Nelson
Eric S. Nelson*
Affiliation:
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
*
eric.nelson@ust.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This contribution offers a sympathetic historical and intercultural reflection on Stephen Palmquist’s work Kant and Mysticism. It examines (1) the appropriateness of this portrayal of Kant and mysticism in relation to its historical context (which encompasses figures such as Malebranche, Spinoza and Swedenborg), suggesting that Kant is committed to an account of rationality, ethical personhood and a ‘critical ethos’ in tension with mysticism; and (2) the inadequacy of Kant’s understanding of mysticism in the context of South and East Asian philosophical and religious discourses, indicating the need for an intercultural turn in the philosophy of religion.

Keywords

intercultural philosophymysticismperspectivismrationality
Type
Author Meets Critic
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 119 - 127
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kant, Immanuel (1929) Kant’s Inaugural Dissertation and Early Writings on Space. Trans. John Handyside. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Opus Postumum. Trans. Eckart Förster and Michael Rosen, ed. Förster, Eckart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999) Correspondence. Trans. Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001) ‘The End of All Things’ and selections from Lectures on the Philosophical Doctrine of Religion, trans. Allen W. Wood, in Allen W., Wood and George, di Giovanni (eds), Religion and Rational Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 221–31, 341–451.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2003) Dreams of a Spirit-Seer Elucidated by Dreams of Metaphysics. In Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. and ed. Walford, David and Meerbote, Ralf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 301–60.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (1980) Dialogue between a Christian Philosopher and a Chinese Philosopher on the Existence and Nature of God. Trans. Dominick A. Iorio. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas (2006) The Search After Truth. Trans. Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mou, Zongsan (1971) Zhi de zhijue yu Zhongguo zhexue (Intellectual Intuition and Chinese Philosophy). Taipei: Taiwan shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. (2009) ‘Kant and China: Aesthetics, Race, and Nature’. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38, 509–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric S. (2017) Chinese and Buddhist Philosophy in Early Twentieth-Century German Thought. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (1987) ‘Knowledge and Experience: An Examination of the Four Reflective “Perspectives” in Kant’s Critical Philosophy’. Kant-Studien, 78, 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (1992) ‘Does Kant Reduce Religion to Morality?’. Kant-Studien, 83, 129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (1993) Kant’s System of Perspectives: An Architectonic Interpretation of the Critical Philosophy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2008) ‘Kant’s Moral Panentheism’. Philosophia, 36, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (ed.) (2010) Cultivating Personhood: Kant and Asian Philosophy. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2011) ‘Architectonic Reasoning and Interpretation in Kant and the Yijing ’. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38, 569–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2015) ‘Twelve Basic Philosophical Concepts in Kant and the Compound Yijing ’. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 42, 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2016) Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen R. (2019) Kant and Mysticism: Critique as the Experience of Baring All in Reason’s Light. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar