Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-fdz9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-26T19:55:25.933Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Kant as Both Conceptualist and Nonconceptualist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2016

Sacha Golob*
King’s College London


This article advances a new account of Kant’s views on conceptualism. On the one hand, I argue that Kant was a nonconceptualist. On the other hand, my approach accommodates many motivations underlying the conceptualist reading of his work: for example, it is fully compatible with the success of the Transcendental Deduction. I motivate my view by providing a new analysis of both Kant’s theory of perception and of the role of categorical synthesis: I look in particular at the categories of quantity. Locating my interpretation in relation to recent research by Allais, Ginsborg, Tolley and others, I argue that it offers an attractive compromise on this important theoretical and exegetical issue.

© Kantian Review 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Allais, L. (2009) ‘Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47, 383413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, L. (2011) ‘Transcendental Idealism and the Transcendental Deduction’. In D. Schulting and J. Verburgt (eds), Kant’s Idealism (London: Springer), pp. 91108.Google Scholar
Beck, L. W. (1978) Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bowman, B. (2011) ‘A Conceptualist Reply to Hanna’s Kantian Non-Conceptualism’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19, 417446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, L. (1995) Kant’s Intuitionism. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. (2008) ‘Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?’. Philosophical Studies, 137, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, A. (2010) ‘Perception and the Categories’. European Journal of Philosophy, 20, 193222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüne, S. (2011) ‘Is there a Gap in Kant’s B Deduction?’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19, 465490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. (2005) ‘Kant and Nonconceptual Content’. European Journal of Philosophy, 13, 247290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. (2011) ‘Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and the Gap in the B Deduction’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 19, 399415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. 2nd edn, text revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1902–) Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1991–) The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, ed. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McLear, C. (2011) ‘Kant on Animal Consciousness’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 11, 116.Google Scholar
Posy, C. (2000) ‘Immediacy and the Birth of Reference in Kant’. In G. Sher and R. L. Tieszen (eds), Between Logic and Intuition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 155185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaks, J. (2005) ‘Is there a Problem about Nonconceptual Content?’. Philosophical Review, 114, 359398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, D. (2004) ‘The Role of Magnitude in Kant’s Critical Philosophy’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 34, 411442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolley, C. (2013) ‘The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions’. Kantian Review, 18, 107136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdine, A., et al. (2013) ‘Deconstructing Building Blocks: Preschoolers’ Spatial Assembly Performance Relates to Early Mathematical Skills’. Child Development, 40, 114.Google Scholar
Waxman, W. (2013) Kant’s Anatomy of the Intelligent Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar