Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:41:50.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Malthus's Vision of the Population Problem in the Essay on Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Extract

In his Presidential address to the American Economic Association, Gary Becker alludes to Thomas Malthus's “great contribution” (1988, p. 1) in a prologue to a wider exploratory discussion of some of the implications for macroeconomics flowing from recent programs in family economics. The content of the contribution as represented here (p. 2) includes diminishing returns to increases in employment “when land and other capital are fixed;” population growth positively related to the wage, the lower population growth at low wages turning on reduced birth rates (the preventive check) and increased death rates (the positive check); and a long-run equilibrium wage at which population is constant at a level determined by the production function. Becker emphasizes the stability of the equilibrium wage in the face of disturbances. A catastrophic reduction in population size (eg. the Black Death) and consequently a wage increase will be followed by positive population growth which restores both the wage and population size to their respective equilibrium levels. In the event of increases in the amount of usuable land, population size will become permanently higher with the wage ultimately reduced to its original long-run level. Becker represents Malthus as reaching “much more pessimistic conclusions about the long-term economic prospects of the average family” than, for example, Godwin and Condorcet who had maintained that the economic position of mankind will continue to improve over time.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, G.S. 1988. “Family Economics and Macro Behavior,American Economic Review, 78, 03, 113.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1985. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 4th ed.Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dupâquier, J., ed. 1983. Malthus Past and Present, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1987. Classical Economics, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Lee, R.D. and Schofield, R.S. 1981. “British Population in the Eighteenth Century;” in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D., The Economic History of Great Britain Since 1700, vol. I, 1700–1860, 1735.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R. 1926. An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798), Facsimile edition, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R.. 1806. An Essay on the Principle of Population, 3rd edition, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R.. 1817. An Essay on the Principle of Population, 5th edition, London.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R. 1986. The Works of Thomas Robert Malthus, in 8 volumes. Pickering edition, Wrigley, E.A. and Souden, D., eds. London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.R. 1962. Abstract of British Historical Statistics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David 1951. Works and Correspondence, Straffa, P., ed., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam 1937. The Wealth of Nations, Modern Library edition. London.Google Scholar
Weyland, J. 1816. The Principles of Population and Production, no publisher.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. 1983. “The Growth of Population in Eighteenth-Century England: A Conundrum Resolved,Past and Present, no. 98, 121150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar