Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Juan Ramón Rallo (a1)


The discussions of the Bullionist Controversy were closely related to the effects of inconvertibility on prices and exchange rates. However, during their discussions, economists had a need to address other important questions such as the convenience of free banking. In this paper, we will study the perspective of the different schools involved in the debate on this issue: we will show that their positions were wholly coherent with their underlying assumptions on the nature of monetary assets. The economists who viewed gold and banknotes as perfect substitutes, such as the radical bullionists, tended to favor a ban on free banking. On the contrary, the economists who viewed banknotes and gold as imperfect substitutes, such as the moderate bullionists and antibullionists, were inclined to favor free banking.



Hide All
Arnon, Arie. 1987. “Banking Between the Invisible and Visible Hands: A Reinterpretation of Ricardo’s Place within the Classical School.” Oxford Economic Papers 39 (2): 268281.
Arnon, Arie. 2009. “Re-examination of Thornton’s Innovative Monetary Analysis: The Bullion Debate during the Restriction Once Again.” History of Political Economy 41 (3): 545574.
Arnon, Arie. 2011. Monetary Theory and Policy from Hume and Smith to Wicksell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boase, Henry. 1804. A letter to the Right Hon. Lord King, in defence of the conduct of the directors of the banks of England and Ireland. London: W. Bulmer for G. and W. Nicol.
Boase, Henry. 1811. Remarks on the New Doctrine Concerning the Supposed Depreciation of Our Currency. London: Bulmer and Co. Cleveland-Row.
Brown, Richard 1991. Society and Economy in Modern Britain 1700–1850. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bosanquet, Charles. 1810. Practical Observations on the Report of the Bullion Committee. London: J. M. Richardson.
Boyd, Walter. 1801. A letter to the Right Honourable William Pitt: on the influence of the stoppage of issues in specie at the Bank of England. London: T. Gillet.
Bullion Committee. 1810. Report, Together with, Minutes of Evidence, and Accounts, from the Select Committee on the High Price of Bullion. London: J. Johnson and Co.
Chadha, Jagjit, and Newby, Elisa. 2013. “Midas, Transmuting All, into Paper: The Bank of England and the Banque de France During the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.” Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 20/2013.
Eliot, Francis Perceval. 1811. Observations on the Fallacy of the Supposed Depreciation of the Paper Currency of the Kingdom with Reasons for Dissenting from the Report of the Bullion Committee. London: J. J. Stockdale.
Friedman, Milton. 1956. “The Quantity Theory of Money—A Restatement.” In Friedman, Milton, ed., Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 321.
Glasner, David. 1992. “The Real-Bills Doctrine in the Light of the Law of Reflux.” History of Political Economy 24 (2): 867894.
Glasner, David. 2015. “Monetary Disequilibrium and the Demand for Money in Ricardo and Thornton.” In Sato, Yuji and Takenaga, Susumu, eds., Ricardo on Money and Finance. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, pp. 1529.
Hayek, Friedrich. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35 (4): 519530.
Horner, Francis 1803. “Review of Lord King: ‘Thoughts on the Restriction of Payments in Specie at the Banks of England and Ireland.’” Edinburgh Review II (IV): 402421.
Huskisson, William. 1810. The Question Concerning the Depreciation of Our Currency Stated and Examined. London: John Murray.
Huskisson, William. 1831. The Speeches of the Right Honourable William Huskisson. Volume II. London: John Murray.
King, Peter [Lord]. 1804. Thoughts on the Effects of the Bank Restrictions. London: Cadell and Davies.
Laidler, David. 2000. Highlights of the Bullionist Controversy. Stockholm School of Economics, Research Report #13. Stockholm: Institute for Research in Economic History.
Le Maux, Laurent. 2012. “The Banking School and the Law of Reflux in General.” History of Political Economy 44 (4): 595618.
Loyd, Samuel Jones [Lord Overstone]. 1837. Further Reflections on the State of the Currency and the Action of the Bank of England. London: Pelham Richardson.
Mints, Lloyd. 1945. A History of Banking Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, Antoin, 2003, “Paper Credit and the Multi-Personae Mr. Henry Thornton.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10 (3): 429453.
Neal, Larry. 1998. “The Financial Crisis of 1825 and the Restructuring of the British Financial System.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 80 (3): 5376.
Norman, George Warde. 1838. Remarks upon Some Prevalent Errors, with Respect to Currency and Banking and Suggestion to the Legislature and the Public as to the Improvement of the Monetary System. London: Pelham Richardson.
Perlman, Morris. 1986. “The Bullionist Controversy Revisited.” Journal of Political Economy 94 (4): 745762.
Pressnell, Leslie. 1956. Country Banking in the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ricardo, David. 1810. The High Price of Bullion: A Proof of the Depreciation of Bank Notes. London: John Murray.
Ricardo, David. 1811. Reply to Mr. Bosanquet’s Practical Observations on the Report of the Bullion Committee. London: John Murray.
Ricardo, David. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray.
Ricardo, David. 1824. Plan for the Establishment of a National Bank. London: John Murray.
Rist, Charles. 1940. History of Monetary and Credit Theory: From John Law to the Present Day. London: The Macmillan Company.
Selgin, George. 1988. The Theory of Free Banking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Skaggs, Neil. 2005. “Treating Schizophrenia: A Comment on Antoin Murphy’s Diagnosis of Henry Thornton’s Theoretical Condition.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (2): 321328.
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1904. The Wealth of Nations. London: Methuen and Co.
Smith, Thomas. 1807. Essay on the Theory of Money. London: Cadell and Davies.
The Earl of Rosse. 1811. Observations on the Present State of the Currency of England. London: J. J. Stockdale.
Thornton, Henry. [1797, 1802] 1965. “The Evidence Given by Henry Thornton before the Committees of the Two Houses of Parliament on the Bank of England.” In Thornton, Henry, An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, pp. 277310.
Thornton, Henry. [1802] 1965. An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Tooke, Thomas. 1844. An Inquiry into the Currency Principle. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
Torrens, Robert. 1812. An Essay on Money and Paper Currency. London: J. Johnson.
Vansittart, Nicholas. 1811. Substance of the Two Speeches Made by the Right Honorable Nicholas Vansittart. London: J. Hatchard.
Viner, Jacob. 1937. Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
Wheatley, John. 1803. Remarks on Currency and Commerce. London: Candell and Davies.
Wheatley, John. 1807. An Essay on the Theory of Money and Principles of Commerce. London: Candell and Davies.
White, Lawrence. 1995. Free Banking in Britain. London: The Institute of Economics Affairs.
White, Lawrence. 1999. The Theory of Monetary Institutions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wilson, James. 1847. Capital, Currency, and Banking. London: Office of the Economist.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed