Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T08:19:05.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptualizing Inequality and Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Joseph Persky  and
Gilbert W. Bassett Jr
Joseph Persky
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago
Gilbert W. Bassett Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Finance, University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Economists and finance researchers have long recognized the “close relation between the measurement of inequality and the measurement of risk” (Breitmeyer et al., 2004). Economists today agree that a measure of income inequality must respect the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle, that is, inequality cannot increase with a transfer from a richer person to a poorer person. Finance researchers today agree that a measure of risk must respect the diversification principle, that is, risk cannot increase when portfolios are combined. Where did these convictions originate? While both principles were advocated early in their respective fields, they were not viewed as definitive until relatively recently. In both fields major empirical and theoretical efforts were mounted in support of various conceptualizations at odds with these two principles. For example, Robert Gibrat advocated the use of the variance of log income despite the fact it is inconsistent with the Pigou-Dalton principle. In finance, value at risk (VaR), although it can violate the diversification principle, was widely advocated. People supporting research programs at odds with Pigou-Dalton or the diversification principle, based those programs on ambitious empirical and theoretical claims about distributions. Such claims could have been right and are not a priori or logically false. The purpose of this paper is to review these “at odds” conceptualizations, the types of arguments advanced for their legitimacy, and the reasons they have been given up.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 81 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreou, Elena, Pittis, Nikitas and Aris, Spanos (2001) On Modelling Speculative Prices: Empirical Literature, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (2), pp. 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armatte, Michel (1998) Robert Gibrat and the Law of Proportional Effect, in: Samuels, Warren et al. (Eds) European Economists of the Early 20th Century, Vol. 1 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), pp. 94–111.Google Scholar
Artzner, Philippe, Delbaen, Freddy, Jean-Marc, Eber, Heath, David (1999) Coherent Measures of Risk, Mathematical Finance, 9 (3), pp. 203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitmeyer, Garsten, Hendrik, Hakenes, and Andreas, Pfingsten (2004) From Poverty Measurement to the Measurement of Downside Risk, Mathematical Social Sciences, 47 (3), pp. 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caws, Peter (1957) A Reappraisal of the Conceptual Scheme of Science, Philosophy of Science, 24 (3), pp. 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caws, Peter (1959) The Functions of Definition in Science, Philosophy of Science, 26 (3), pp. 201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champernowne, D. G. (1953) A Model of Income Distribution, Economic Journal, 63 (250), pp. 318–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, John (1974) The Welfare Ranking of Pareto Distributions, Journal of Economic Theory, 9 (3), pp. 275–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtault, Jean-Michel, Kabanov, Yuri, Bru, Bernard, Crépel, Pierre, Lebon, Isabelle, and Le Marchand, Arnaud (2000) Louis Bachelier: On the Centenary of? Theorie de la Speculation, Mathematical Finance, 10 (3), pp. 341–53.Google Scholar
Dalton, Hugh (1920) The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes, Economic Journal, 30 (119), pp. 348–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1924) Untried Methods of Representing Frequency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 87(4), pp. 571–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1953) Choice, Chance, and the Personal Distribution of Income, Journal of Political Economy, 61 (4), pp. 277–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallon, Francis (1879) The Geometric Mean, in Vital and Social Statistics, Proceedings, Royal Society of London, v. XXIX, pp. 365–67.Google Scholar
Gini, Corrado (1921) Measurement of Inequality of Incomes, Economic Journal, 31 (121), pp. 124–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibrat, R. (1931) Les Inegalites Economiques (Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey).Google Scholar
Gut, Christian, Limpert, Eckhard, and Hinterberger, Hans, “Modelling the Genesis of Normal and Log-Normal Distributions,” uri: http://www.inf.ethz.ch/~gut/lognormal/.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive (2001) Comparing the Methodologies Used by Statisticians and Economists for Research and Modeling, Journal of Socio-Economies, 30 (1), pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1990) The Taming of Chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Charles (1924) Readings in Risk and Risk-Bearing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. (1935) A Suggestion for Simplifying the Theory of Money, Economica, New Series, 2 (5), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Franck and LeGall, Philippe (2001) Does God Practice a Random Walk?: The “Financial Physics” of a Nineteenth-Century Forerunner, Jules Regnault, European Journal of Economic Thought, 8 (3), pp. 332–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1945) On the Gibrat Distribution, Econometrica, 13 (2), pp. 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapteyn, J. C. (1904) Skew Frequency Curves in Biology and Statistics (Groningen: Astronomical Laboratory at Groningen P. Noordhoff).Google Scholar
Kirman, Alan (1987) Pareto as an Economic Theorist, in: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (Eds) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Theory and Doctrine (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, Benoit (1960) The Pareto-Levy Law and the Distribution of Income, International Economic Review, 1 (2), pp. 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, Harry (1952) Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, 7 (1), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
Marschak, J. (1934) The Meetings of the Econometric Society in Leyden, September—October, 1933, Econometrica, 2 (2), pp. 187–203.Google Scholar
Moore, Henry (1907) The Variability of Wages, Political Science Quarterly, 22 (1), pp. 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo (1897a) Cours D'Economie Politique, Tome 2 (Lausanne: Librairie de l'Universite).Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo (1897b) The New Theories of Economies, Journal of Political Economy, 5 (4), pp. 485–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1912) Wealth and Welfare (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Persky, Joseph (1992) Retrospectives: Pareto's Law, Journal of Economie Perspectives, 6 (2), pp. 181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persons, Warren (1909) The Variability in the Distribution of Wealth and Income, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23 (3), pp. 416–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, Ser-Huang and Granger, Clive (2003) Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review, Journal of Economic Literature, 41 (2), pp. 478–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quetelet, Adolphe Jacques (1842) A Treatise on Man and the Development of his Faculties (Gainesville, FL, Scholars' Facsimiles and Reprints, facsimile 1969).Google Scholar
Rothschild, Michael and Stiglitz, Joseph (1970) Increasing Risk: I. A Definition, Journal of Economic Theory, 2 (3), pp. 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Michael and Stiglitz, Joseph (1973) Some Further Results on the Measurement of Inequality, Journal of Economic Theory, 6 (2), pp. 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Mark (2002) Markowitz's “Portfolio Selection”: A Fifty-Year Retrospective, Journal of Finance, 57 (3), pp. 1041–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorrocks, Anthony (1983) Ranking Income Distributions, Economica, New Series, 50 (197), pp. 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szego, Giorgio (2002) Measures of Risk, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7), 1253–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. B. (1938) The Theory of Investment Value (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Working, Holbrook (1934) A Random Difference Series for Use in the Analysis of Time Series, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 29 (185), pp. 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar