Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:52:34.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHARLES GANILH'S AN INQUIRY INTO THE VARIOUS SYSTEMS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY AND SUBSEQUENT WRITING: ENGLISH AND FRENCH CONTEXTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

WILLIE HENDERSON
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 511 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1812. “Review of Charles Ganilh's An Inquiry into the Various Systems of Political Economy.” American Review of History and Politics (October): 306–53.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1812. “Review of Charles Ganilh's An Inquiry into the Various Systems of Political Economy.” Monthly Magazine 33 (229): 612–34.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1813. “Review of Charles Ganilh's An Inquiry into the Various Systems of Political Economy.” Monthly Review LXX1 (May August): 419–22.Google Scholar
Béraud, Alain, Gislain, Jean-Jacque, and Steiner, Philippe. 2004 “L’économie politique néo-Smithienne en France (1803–1848).” Économies et Sociétés, Histoire de la pensée économique, série PE, Œconomia février (34): 325–420.Google Scholar
Boileau, David.” 1990. Entries at 079, 080 and 145. In Bank, David and Esposito, Antony, eds., British Biographical Index. London: K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
Boileau, David. 1810, 1814. Elisabeth ou les Exilés de Sibérie par Madame Cottin. Paris et Londres chez Colburn: Libraire.Google Scholar
Boileau, David. 1811. An Introduction to the Study of Political Economy; or, Elementary view of the manner in which the wealth of nations is produced, increased, distributed and considered. London: T. Caldwell and W. Davies.Google Scholar
Bridel, Pascal. 1987. “Ganilh, Charles.” In Eatwell, John, Millgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coquelin, Charles and Guillaumin, Gilbert-Urbain. 1873. Dictionnaire de l’économie politique contenant l'exposition des principes de la science. Paris: Guillaumin.Google Scholar
D'Hauterive, le Comte. 1817. Eléments d’économie politque suivis de quelques vues sur l'application des principes de cette science aux règles administratives. Paris: Fatin.Google Scholar
Ferrier, F. L. A. 1822. Du Gouvernement Consideré dans les Rapports Avec le Commerce, 3rd edition. Paris: Pélicier.Google Scholar
Ganilh, Charles. 1806. Essai politique sur le revenue publique des peoples de l'antiquité, du moyen âge, et des siècles modernes, et spécialement de la France et de l'Angleterre. Paris: Treuttel et Wurtz.Google Scholar
Ganilh, Charles. 1809. Des systèmes d’économie politique, de leurs inconvénients, de leurs avantages et de la doctrine la plus favorable aux progrès de la richesse des nations. Paris: Xhrouet.Google Scholar
Ganilh, Charles 1812. An Inquiry into the Various Systems of Political Economy; their advantages and disadvantages and the theory most favourable to the increase of National Wealth, translated by Boileau, D.. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
Ganilh, Charles. 1815. La théorie de l’économie politique, fondée sur les faits résultans des statistiques de la France et de l'Angleterre; sur les expériences de tous les peuples célèbres par leurs richesses; et sur les lumières de la raison. Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Ganilh, Charles. 1822. La théorie de l’économie politique, fondée sur les faits résultans des statistiques de la France et de l'Angleterre; sur les expériences de tous les peuples célèbres par leurs richesses; et sur les lumières de la raison, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Ganilh, Charles. 1826. Dictionnaire analytique d’économie politique. Brussels: Ladvocat librarie.Google Scholar
Hébert, Robert F. “Garnier, Clément Joseph.” In Eatwell, John, Millgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave A Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heckscher, Eli F. 1922. The Continental System: An Economic Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Willie. 1995. Economics as Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoffman, David. 1817. A Course of Legal Study; respectfully addressed to the Students of law in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Coale and Maxwell.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Tom. 2002. “Code Civil,” NapoleonSeries.org. Retrieved April 5, 2004.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Tom. 2004. “The Finances of France in 1799.” NapoleonSeries.org, retrieved May 27, 2004.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jeremy. 2007. “The Debate about Luxury in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century French Political Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (1): 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lacour-Gayet, Robert. 1968. “Napoléon et l’économie.” In Mistler, Jean, ed., Napoléon, Naissance d'un empire, Veanrviers: Marabout, pp. 255–81.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas Robert, 1812. Definitions of Political Economy. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas R. 1820. Principles of Political Economy Considered with a View to Their Practical Application. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, Thomas R. 1827. Definitions in Political Economy, Preceded by an Inquiry into the Rules Which Ought to Guide Political Economists in the Definition and Use of Their Terms, with Remarks. London.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. [unpublished 1857–1858.] Grundrisse, translated by Nicolaus, M.. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1976. Capital. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Maunier, René. 1911. “Les économistes protectionistes en France de 1815 à 1848.” Révue Internationale de Sociologie 19: 485–510.Google Scholar
McCulloch, John Ramsay. 1824. A Discourse on the Rise, Progress, Peculiar Objects and Importance of Political Economy. London: A. Constable.Google Scholar
McCulloch, John Ramsay. 1833. A Treatise on the Principles, Practice and History of Commerce. The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. London: Baldwin and Craddock.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Ashley, W. J.. London: Augustus M. Kelley, 1987.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin H. 2005. “The Worldwide Impact of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.” Working paper 11344, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romani, Roberto. 2002. “Political Economy and Other Idioms: French Views on English Development, 1815–48.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 9 (3): 359–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2001. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Say, Jean-Baptise. 1855. A Treatise on Political Economy, translated by Prinsep, C. R., edited by Biddle, C. C.. Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott, Grambo & Co. Retrieved February 20, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.econlib.org/library/Say/sayT0.html.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Glasgow edition of The Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, edited by Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S., textual editor Todd, W. B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Staum, Martin S. 1998. “French Lecturers in Political Economy, 1815–1848: Varieties of Liberalism.” History of Political Economy 30 (1): 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Philippe. 1995. “Quels principes pour l’économie politique? Charles Ganilh, Germain Garnier, Jean-Baptiste Say et la critique de la physiocratie.” Economies et Sociétés, Série Oeconomia, Histoire de la Pensée économique, P.E. 22–23, pp. 209–30.Google Scholar
Taussig, Frank William. 1896. Wages and Capital. New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Whatmore, Richard. 2000. Republicanism and the French Revolution: An Intellectual History of Jean-Baptiste Say's Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar