Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:26:21.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply: History's Many Dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Roger E. Backhouse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Fall 1992 , pp. 277 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backhouse, Roger E. 1992. “How Should We Approach The History of Economic Thought, Fact, Fiction or Moral Tale?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14, no. 1, 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 1992b. “The Constructivist Critique of Economic Methodology,” Methodus, 4, no. 1, 65–82.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 1992. Review of Weintraub 1991a, Economic Journal, 102, no. 413, p. 583–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maki, Uskali. 1992. “Two Philosophies of the Rhetoric of Economics,” in Henderson, W., Backhouse, R. and Dudley-Evans, T., eds., Economics and Language, Routledge, London, forthcoming.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1986. The Rhetoric of Economics, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Brighton.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1988. “Thick and Thin Methodologies in the History of Economic Thought,” in Marchi, N. de, ed., The Popperian Legacy in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Schabas, Margaret. 1992. “Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science,” History of Political Economy, 24, no. 1, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1985. General Equilibrium Analysis: Studies in Appraisal, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1989. “Methodology Doesn't Matter, but the History of Thought Might,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, reprinted in Honkapohja, S., ed., The State of Macroeconomics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics: Constructing Economic Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991. “Allais, Stability and Liapunov Theory,” History of Political Economy, 23, no. 3, 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1992. “Comment: Thicker Is Better,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14, Fall 1992, 271–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar