Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

What Is Democracy (and What Is Its Raison D’Etre)?

  • ALVIN I. GOLDMAN (a1)

Abstract:

This article aims to say what democracy is or what the predicate ‘democratic’ means, as opposed to saying what is good, right, or desirable about it. The basic idea—by no means a novel one—is that a democratic system is one that features substantial equality of political power. More distinctively it is argued that ‘democratic’ is a relative gradable adjective, the use of which permits different, contextually determined thresholds of democraticness. Thus, a system can be correctly called ‘democratic’ even if it does not feature perfect equality of power. The article's central undertaking is to give greater precision to the operative notion(s) of power. No complete or fully unified measure of power is offered, but several conceptual tools are introduced that help give suitable content to power measurement. These tools include distinctions between conditional versus unconditional power and direct versus indirect power. Using such tools, a variety of prima facie problems for the power equality approach are addressed and defused. Finally, the theory is compared to epistemic and deliberative approaches to democracy; and reasons are offered for the attractiveness of democracy that flows from the power equality theme.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      What Is Democracy (and What Is Its Raison D’Etre)?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      What Is Democracy (and What Is Its Raison D’Etre)?
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      What Is Democracy (and What Is Its Raison D’Etre)?
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Ackerman, Bruce, and Fishkin, James. (2004) Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Beddor, Robert. (Unpublished manuscript) ‘Certainty First’. Rutgers University, Department of Philosophy.
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William, eds. (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reasons and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christiano, Thomas. (1996) The Rule of the Many. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Christiano, Thomas. (2008) The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. (2010) 558 U.S. 310.
Cohen, Joshua. (1997) ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’. In Bohman, J. and Rehg, W., eds., Deliberative Democracy ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 6791.
Cohen, Joshua. (1998) ‘Democracy and Liberty’. In Elster, J. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 185231.
Condorcet, M. de. (1785) Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse a la Probabilité des Decisions Rendue a la Pluralité des Vois. Paris: De l’Imprimerie Royale.
Cross, Troy. (2012) ‘Recent Work on Dispositions’. Analysis, 72, 115–24.
Dworkin, Ronald. (2000) Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Economist Intelligence Unit's index of democracy. Available at: www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_INDEX_2007_v3.pdf, retrieved 9 March 2015.
Estlund, David. (2008) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Freeman, Samuel. (2000) ‘Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29, 371418.
Goldman, Alvin. (1972) ‘Toward a Theory of Social Power’. Philosophical Studies, 23, 221–68. Reprinted in Goldman, A., Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).
Goldman, Alvin. (1974) ‘On the Measurement of Power’. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 232–52.
Goldman, Alvin. (1976) ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’. Journal of Philosophy, 73, 771–91.
Goldman, Alvin. (1999a) ‘Why Citizens Should Vote: A Causal Responsibility Approach’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 16, 201–17.
Goldman, Alvin. (1999b) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guerrero, Alexander. (Forthcoming) ‘Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative’. Philosophy and Public Affairs.
Guinier, Lani. (1994) The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by Rehg, W.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1962). ‘Measurement of Social Power, Opportunity Costs, and the Theory of Two-Person Bargaining Games’. Behavioral Science, 7, 6780.
Hong, Lu, and Page, Scott. (2001) ‘Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents’. Journal of Economic Theory, 97, 123–63.
Johnston, Mark. (1992) ‘How to Speak about the Colors’. Philosophical Studies, 68, 221–63.
Kekic, Laza. (2007) ‘Economist Intelligence Unit's Democracy Index’. The World in 2007. Available at: http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_INDEX_2007_v3.pdf.
Kolodny, Niko. (2014a) ‘The Rule of None: What Justifies Democracy?Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42, 195229.
Kolodny, Niko. (2014b) ‘The Rule of None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 42, 287336.
Landemore, Helene. (2013) Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. (2011) Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macedo, Stephen (ed.). (1999) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press.
Maier, John. (2014) ‘Abilities’. In Edward, N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/abilities/.
Martin, C. B. (1994) ‘Dispositions and Conditionals’. Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 18.
McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission. (2014) 572 U.S.
Mills, C. Wright. (1959) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
New York Times. (2014) ‘Reaction to the Supreme Court's Campaign Finance Decision’. April 2. Available at: http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/02/reaction-to-supreme-court-decision/?_r=0.
Page, Scott. (2007) The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pettit, Philip. (2012) On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. (1999) ‘Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense’. In Shapiro, I. and Hacker-Cordon, C. (eds.), Democracy's Value (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 23–55.
Rawls, John. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.
Shapley, L. S., and Shubik, M.. (1954) ‘A Method of Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System’. American Political Science Review, 48, 787–92.
Smith, A. D. (1977) ‘Dispositional Properties’. Mind, 86, 439–45.
Weber, Max. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed