Skip to main content Accessibility help

Two Ways to Particularize a Property



Trope theory is an increasingly prominent contender in contemporary debates about the existence and nature of properties. But it suffers from ambiguity concerning the nature of a trope. Disambiguation reveals two fundamentally different concepts of a trope: modifier tropes and module tropes. These types of tropes are unequally suited for metaphysical work. Modifier tropes have advantages concerning powers, relations, and fundamental determinables, whereas module tropes have advantages concerning perception, causation, character-grounding, and the ontology of substance. Thus, the choice between modifier tropes and module tropes is significant and divides the advantages of trope theory simpliciter. In addition, each resulting trope theory is unstable: modifier trope theory threatens to collapse into realism, and module trope theory threatens to collapse into austere nominalism. This invites reflection on the stability of trope theory in general.



Hide All
Armstrong, D. (1980a) Nominalism and Realism: Universals and Scientific Realism. Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. (1980b) Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals. Vol 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. (1989) Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Armstrong, D. (1997) A World of States of Affairs. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, K. (1976) Metaphysics: An Introduction. Encino, CA: Dickenson.
Campbell, K. (1990) Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Campbell, K. (1981) ‘The Metaphysic of Abstract Particulars’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 6, 477–88.
Carroll, J., and Markosian, N.. (2010) An Introduction to Metaphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, D. (2014) Properties. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Ehring, D. (1996) ‘Mental Causation, Determinables and Property Instances’. Nous, 30, 461–80.
Ehring, D. (1997) Causation and Persistence: A Theory of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ehring, D. (2011) Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Forrest, P. (1993) ‘Just like Quarks’. In Bacon, J., Campbell, K., and Reinhardt, L. (eds.), Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays in Honor of D. M. Armstrong (New York: Cambridge University Press), 4565.
Garcia, R. K. (2014) ‘Bare Particulars and Constituent Ontology’. Acta Analytica, 29, 149–59.
Garcia, R. K. (2015a) ‘Is Trope Theory a Divided House?’ In Galluzzo, G. and Loux, M. (eds.), The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press), 133–55.
Garcia, R. K. (2015b) ‘Tropes as Divine Acts: The Nature of Creaturely Properties in a World Sustained by God’. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 7, 105130.
Garcia, R. K. (Forthcoming) ‘Tropes as Character-Grounders’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Goodman, N. (1966) The Structure of Appearance. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Gracia, J. J. E. (1988) Individuality: An Essay on the Foundations of Metaphysics. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Grossmann, R. (1992) The Existence of the World: An Introduction to Ontology. New York: Routledge.
Heil, J. (2012) The Universe as We Find It. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johansson, I. (2014) ‘All Relations are Internal: The New Version’. In Reboul, A. (ed.), Mind, Values, and Metaphysics: Philosophical Essays in Honor of Kevin Mulligan (New York: Springer), 225–40
Koons, R. C., and Pickavance, T. H.. (2015) Metaphysics: The Fundamentals. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
LaBossiere, M. (1994) ‘Substances and Substrata’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 360–70.
Lewis, D. (1983) ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–77.
Lewis, D. (2001) On the Plurality of Worlds. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Loux, M. J. (2006) Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.
Loux, M. J. (2015) ‘An Exercise in Constituent Ontology’. In Galluzzo, G. and Loux, M. (eds.), The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press), 945.
Lowe, E. J. (1998) The Possibility of Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2006) The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2010) ‘On the Individuation of Powers’. In Marmodoro, A. (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and their Manifestations (New York: Routledge), 826.
Manley, D. (2002) ‘Properties and Resemblance Classes’. Noûs, 36, 7596.
Marmodoro, A. (2010) The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and their Manifestations. New York: Routledge.
Martin, C. (1980) ‘Substance Substantiated’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58, 310.
Martin, C., and Heil, J.. (1999) ‘The Ontological Turn’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, 3460.
Maurin, A.-S. (2002) If Tropes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Maurin, A.-S. (2014) ‘Tropes’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Available at:
Molnar, G. (2003) Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moreland, J. P. (1989) ‘Keith Campbell and the Trope View of Predication’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67, 379–93.
Moreland, J. P. (1997) ‘A Critique of Campbell's Refurbished Nominalism’. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 35, 225–46.
Moreland, J. P. (2001) Universals. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.
Moreland, J. P. (2013) ‘Exemplification and Constituent Realism: A Clarification and Modest Defense’. Axiomathes, 23, 247–59.
O’Leary-Hawthorne, J., and Cover, J. A.. (1998) ‘A World of Universals’. Philosophical Studies, 91, 205–19.
Oliver, A. (1996) ‘The Metaphysics of Properties’. Mind, 105, 180.
Pickavance, T. (2014) ‘Bare Particulars and Exemplification’. American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, 95108.
Robb, D. (2005) ‘Qualitative Unity and the Bundle Theory’. The Monist, 88, 466–92.
Rosenkrantz, G. S. (1993) Haecceity: An Ontological Essay. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Schaffer, J. (2001) ‘The Individuation of Tropes’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 247–57.
Schaffer, J. (2003) ‘The Problem of Free Mass: Must Properties Cluster?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66, 125–38.
Swoyer, C. (1999) ‘How Ontology Might be Possible: Explanation and Inference in Metaphysics’. In French, P. A. and Wettstein, H. K. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 23 (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press), 100–31.
van Cleve, J. (1985).‘Three Versions of the Bundle Theory’. Philosophical Studies, 47, 95107.
van Inwagen, P. (2004) ‘A Theory of Properties’. In Zimmerman, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 1 (New York: Oxford University Press), 107–38.
Williams, D. C. (1953) ‘On the Elements of Being: I’. The Review of Metaphysics, 7, 318.
Wilson, J. M. (2012) ‘Fundamental Determinables’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 12, 117.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed