Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Intuition and Its Place in Ethics

  • ROBERT AUDI (a1)

Abstract:

This paper provides a multifaceted account of intuition. The paper integrates apparently disparate conceptions of intuition, shows how the notion has figured in epistemology as well as in intuitionistic ethics, and clarifies the relation between the intuitive and the self-evident. Ethical intuitionism is characterized in ways that, in phenomenology, epistemology, and ontology, represent an advance over the position of W. D. Ross while preserving its commonsense normative core and intuitionist character. This requires clarifying the sense in which intuitions are non-inferential and explaining how self-evident principles may be maintained without dogmatism, how intuition is significantly analogous to perception, and how rational disagreements can extend even to the self-evident. The paper distinguishes between two orders of normative disagreement, shows how intuition can contribute to resolving normative disagreements, and represents ethical intuitionism as capable of modified forms that depart from its traditional claims in being neutral with respect to both ethical naturalism and metaphysical realism.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aquinas, Thomas. (1944) Summa theologiae. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers.
Aristotle. (2000) Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Crisp, Roger. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Audi, Robert. (2004) The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Audi, Robert. (2006) ‘Ethical Generality and Moral Judgment’. In Dreier, James (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Ethical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell), 285304.
Audi, Robert. (2011) ‘The Ethics of Belief and the Morality of Action: Intellectual Responsibility and Rational Disagreement’. Philosophy, 86, 329.
Bealer, George. (1998) ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy’. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 201–39.
Brandt, R. B. (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christensen, David, and Lackey, Jennifer, eds. (2013) The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Copp, David, ed. (2006) The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DePaul, Michael R., and Ramsey, William, eds. (1998) Rethinking Intuition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Doris, John M. et al., eds. (2010) The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dreier, James, ed. (2006) Contemporary Debates in Ethical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gibbard, Allan. (1990) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldman, Alvin I., and Pust, Joel. (1998) ‘Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence’. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 179–97.
Gopnik, Allison, and Schwitzgebel, Eric. (1998) ‘Whose Intuitions are They, Anyway? The Role of Intuition in Empirical Psychology’. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 7591.
Hare, R. M. (1952) The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hernandez, Jill Graper, ed. (2011) The New Intuitionism. London: Continuum.
Huemer, Michael. (2005) Ethical Intuitionism. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kaspar, David. (2012) Intuitionism. London: Bloomsbury.
Kant, Immanuel. ([1785] 1948) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Paton, H. J.. London: Hutchinson.
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1998) Sources of Normativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Maddy, Penelope. (1980) ‘Perception and Mathematical Intuition’. Philosophical Review, 84 (2), 163–96.
Mill, J. S. ([1861] 1979) Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Prichard, H. A. (1912) ‘Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?’. Mind, 21 (81), 2137.
Rawls, John. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. (2001) Justice as Fairness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roeser, Sabine. (2010) Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Ross, W.D. (1930) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sidgwick, Henry. (1907) The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed.London: Macmillan.
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Young, Liane, and Cushman, Fiery. (2010) ‘Moral Intuition’. In Doris, John M. et al. (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 246–72.
Stevenson, Charles L. (1944) Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sturgeon, Nicholas. (2006) ‘Ethical Naturalism’. In Copp, David (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 91121.
Stratton-Lake, Philip, ed. (2002) Intuitionism: Re-evaluations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tropman, Elizabeth. (2014) ‘Varieties of Moral Intuitionism’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 48, 177–94.
Tucker, Chris, ed. (2013) Seemings and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, Timothy. (2007) The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed